Fingerprint of Random (intuitive system)

[precogmiles]

Stick with precog. I should develop myself as well. That is the only way to win other than AP.

I had a lucky run with reading randomness and believed it is good stuff, but eventually with more testing I found out it is just not what I thought.
I believe gambling to work long term should be positive and fun and not a chore.
Any bet selection that relies on past patterns to win in the future are just nonsense created by the rational mind.

Have you been practicing regularly lately?

[Kairomancer]

Of course gizmotron would argue that RR is based on present coincidences as it happens and effectiveness states.
The problem with his method that very often it seems like a pattern is forming, but when you bet on it it fails to continue or shift into something else. It happens just enough times to balance out the winning patterns in the long run, but the house edge clearly not helps.

Also there is no such thing as universal effectiveness states, because he plays different patterns on different data streams, so it is useless.
The only thing you can track is your luck with patterns. You are either lucky and winning or losing, but because he cut his losses at only 7 units there is not enough data to be useful. There are spikes all over in the sections of the graphs, they could move anywhere at any point.

Also global effect is just common caracteristic of data streams of random and as useless as any past patterns or the Law of the third.

[Kairomancer]

Have you been practicing regularly lately?

Nope. My life is full of stress negativity and mess up at the moment.
I have to amend the sources of stress first.
That is why I experimenting with systems.
On the good side I saved up a healthy bankroll.

[precogmiles]

Nope. My life is full of stress negativity and mess up at the moment.
I have to amend the sources of stress first.
That is why I experimenting with systems.
On the good side I saved up a healthy bankroll.

Well good luck, I wish you all the best.

I definitely believe precog is the only way. I just did a practice run of my precog skills and I was more succuessful in terms of win ratio than I was wasting my time on this system. Precog is without a doubt the best approach.

[Kairomancer]

Thanks. Good luck. More success awaiting you as well.

It was not a waste of time. Sometimes it takes effort to clear the distractions, so we can refocus and secure our main course.

[gizmotron2]

Also global effect is just common caracteristic of data streams of random and as useless as any past patterns or the Law of the third.

Every Global Effect I ever saw I massacred the casino while it continued. It's like a green light comes on and the same characteristic lasts for hours.

Thanks for trying it out. That was a lot of work.

[Taotie]

I've tried to follow your instructions; have a look at the game link:[url="s://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/303055230808c56376be28a2d4da3ee0"]s://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/303055230808c56376be28a2d4da3ee0[/url] is this roughly correct?

Not correct, way off actually.

I have created an account on rsim and played an example session so anyone interested can dissect the game and see how to play what I suggested.

Only difference being that instead of pushing on with a double up, I increase the stakes by 1 unit after any lost round until back in profit with a new bankroll high.

Ignore my other game, I made a blunder so cashed out of that one.


link:s://roulette-simulator.info/en/game/5790326f367fd5038a489a11dea2372a

[precogmiles]

Not correct, way off actually.

I have created an account on rsim and played an example session so anyone interested can dissect the game and see how to play what I suggested.

Only difference being that instead of pushing on with a double up, I increase the stakes by 1 unit after any lost round until back in profit with a new bankroll high.

Ignore my other game, I made a blunder so cashed out of that one.

Interesting, Would be good to see it tested over more spins.

[Taotie]

I played another game and will try to play a few more out of curiosity, but I don't have time to do exhaustive testing on this.

Maybe I should pay ignatus to code it in RX just to see?

[Taotie]

Here's a twist, I've been doing this a long time so I'm pretty good at churning out systems to the point where I don't have to think too much into it at all. They usually turn out just as good and strong as methods created over extended time and input.

It is feasible that for me, a level of intuition is involved in blurting out these playable systems.

Out of curiosity, next time I go to the casino I might try getting in the zone (cactus juice works well for me) then blurting out a system to play for the night or a few spins with low stakes. A whole other level of precognition... could be fun.

[Joe]

I've been doing this a long time so I'm pretty good at churning out systems to the point where I don't have to think too much into it at all. They usually turn out just as good and strong as methods created over extended time and input.

Taotie, so what in your opinion and experience separates a good system from a mediocre or bad one? What advice would you give to any aspiring system designer?

[precogmiles]

Out of curiosity, next time I go to the casino I might try getting in the zone (cactus juice works well for me) then blurting out a system to play for the night or a few spins with low stakes. A whole other level of precognition... could be fun.

You never know you might have a natural talent.

[Steve]

Following intuition has a better chance to win than treating random numbers like horses in a race. One might work, the other definitely doesn't work.

[precogmiles]

Following intuition has a better chance to win than treating random numbers like horses in a race. One might work, the other definitely doesn't work.

Yes this is very true. It is that logical mind that wants to create patterns and apply logic to everything.

[Kairomancer]

I think the whole point of random is being chaotic and unpredictable by logic.
If you can apply logic to successfully predict better than random guesses then it fails to be random anymore.
Random do not adheres to any theories.