Winning system

[Steve]

All you need is random bets, progression, and good luck.

Most players mistake temporarily good luck with a "good system".

In fact every system is much the same. They're just random bets, so what do they change? Nothing.

The only difference between systems is amount wagered.

[Elite]

Unless you have data additional to mere bets, a video would need to be weeks long to have statistically significant data. I could even show you a system that won for a year, but it eventually lost too. Its a year of play enough proof? Maybe 8000 spins.. nope.

HI Steve,  my testing  strategy
Test1
10 sets of 180 spins (evolution wheel , moving one way )
if out of 10 ,8 sets win , means system should be consider for next testing.
Tes2
10 sets of 180 spins (evolution wheel , moving one way )
passing, 8 out of 10 wins(wins should have enoug amount in each set. >50 )
and total wins  and loss ratio should be >1k in 10 sets.
Test3
Test4
Test5
Test6
Test7
Test8
Test9
Test10

so in last 10 sets , balance should be 10k, and win ratio also must meet  8 /10

most importatn  what is max loss, it should not exceed -500 if playing with 1 unit.

He is charging a lot on hour basis, so this systme all claims, (500 blance,) and 99 percent hit ratio, if 12 number then  within 5 times hit and if 9 number then within 8 spin hit must need to test. So that ppl aware before buying this product.
I m little interested , because i think, it can may work

[BP12]

Why do we always end up like this? Stop posting about other systems in this thread PLEASE. If you’re not interested then move on and stop take focus from what this thread is ment for.

And for god sake the price is not $2500 that’s what I think it’s worth and what I should take. I’m open for offers but won’t go under $500. Though for some guys I probably should charge more since the information doesn’t seem to go all the way through..

[Steve]

Again the wins are short term. The long term result is still loss. How quickly you lose depends on amount bet and luck.

How long a system lasts isnt a measure of how good it is. Remember they're just random bets, with varying bet size.

This truth is unpopular and people even attack whoever says it. But it's the truth.

[BP12]

Yeah in most cases I would agree with that. Though I think you can limit the random if there is an event you know most likely will occur in every cycle.

If you play against that event then every bet won’t be that random.

Though I see what you mean.

[Anastasius]

I hope nobody here would pay for
Anything that hasn't
Beaten millions of rx or other test spins. Did we all start yesterday? Do we all play virtual pokie roulette or something?

[moonstone]

Warning My friends, not to this topic but dont trust on YouTube catchin roulette Cheater or best roulette 2020 same shit . Dont pay

[BP12]

Anastatius, please tell me. What goes through your mind when making such comment? What do you like to achieve with it? I’m just curious..

Are you hired to protect the forum members? If not, then I don’t see a reason why you would assume that people can’t think for themself and make own decisions. It’s getting stupid that I need to defend myself since all I do is offering a system for those that have money and are interested in learning a way to play that showed to be profitible. Why some people still think they have to express their warnings I will never get and it’s beyond me why people care so much what others do with THEIR money.

Oh well, maybe it’s just me that thinks different.. it’s nice to see that you cares so much about others though

[Steve]

Though I think you can limit the random if there is an event you know most likely will occur in every cycle.

If you play against that event then every bet won’t be that random.

That's fallacy. Betting against an event never, never works.

An example is betting there won't be 37 unique numbers in 37 spins. Why this theory totally misses the mark has been explained many times.

The animosity from members happens when you attempt to sell something that's no better than any other losing system, yet the system is promoted as being better.

[Steve]

Another example is saying the sequence RRRRRR is rare, so you should bet B next. Because like another R is rare.

Its a basic example thats easy to understand. Other approaches that bet against rare sequences are the same crap. Only they are more complex, so players dont recognize its the same shit repackaged.

[ignatus]

Problem with you Steve, you never give any REAL advice how to win roulette. We all have to make these zillions of mistakes before (perhaps) we find something that works? IF you are going to complain, then you could instead point to what WORKS,... i never seen you did this? 

[Steve]

Seriously? Ive done it constantly.

For example many times I've said start with basic vb. i even gave videos. Also my thread in the outside the box area if ap isnt your thing. Try anything new. Just not the same old stuff.

I am often perceived as negative. Should i be positive about obvious mistakes? Should i lie?

And the problem with most members is they don't even understand the most basic points. So they don't understand anything else.

[Serendipity]

Riddles... Riddles... Riddles...

[Steve]

Riddles, from me?

Riddles only if you havent been around to see me say the same thing in plain english hundreds of times. Rather than riddles, its being sick of repeating myself.

Start with the basics. Plain English:
:.roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy/

You dont need to like AP. Most people arent suited to it anyway. At least understand why the same crap doesnt work, then try something NEW.

[ignatus]

For example many times I've said start with basic vb.

I have coded VB. Took me over 2 weeks to make that code. The BET is same distance (pockets) away on each side as the previous spin....and? i´ve just tested that system (with different neigbours) EVEN tried Bet same distance for x number of spins..... and? IT DOESNT WORK. At all. sorry to say. :/