Project 202

[GLC]

Thanks Bayes,

Nice little tool.

I took a quick look.

I'll have to study it some to learn how to use it to it's full capacity.

Old brain isn't working so well with these new computer toys.

Cheers,

George

[F_LAT_INO]

Thanks Bayes,

Nice little tool.

I took a quick look.

I'll have to study it some to learn how to use it to it's full capacity.

Old brain isn't working so well with these new computer toys.

Cheers,

George

---Compesating you not alone George mate.....I personally don't need
those toys as am not playing on line.

[Bayes]

@ George,

You're right, it does take some exercising of the grey cells, but it's a helluva lot more efficient than testing by hand and a LOT easier than learning how to code.

@ F_LAT_INO,

It's just a way to test systems, which most of us do whether we play online or not.

[GLC]

@ George,

You're right, it does take some exercising of the grey cells, but it's a helluva lot more efficient than testing by hand and a LOT easier than learning how to code.

@ F_LAT_INO,

It's just a way to test systems, which most of us do whether we play online or not.

Bayes,

You're right about it saving a lot of time waiting for a wheel to spin while testing systems.  Even testing Project 202 isn't so hard, I just set the bet size, the number of spins and then I adjust the new bet size after 40 spins, etc...  It's not that hard if you don't try to do such a complicated system.

On my computer, there's quite a wait every time the program has to recalc in any way, but overall I like it.

George

[Tomla021]

i think it has promise? little by little!

[WannaWin]

PDF Document for Project 202 uploaded by me in the forum download section:

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;id=82

WannaWin

[vladir]

Anyone still playing with this philosophy in mind?

[GLC]

Anyone still playing with this philosophy in mind?

As far as I know this has been tested moderately by myself and others.  The final conclusion is that it is only slightly better than a flat bet.  If you go through a really bad hit rate session, it can take forever to pull out.  I think the author increases the bets too much when he starts doubling the bet sizes although if you have enough bankroll, it will recover most of the time, eventually.  I'm not saying it can't lose, just that it will take a very long time before you conclude that it can lose.

It's based on the assumption that a really bad hit rate will end within a few hundred spins and we all know that a bad hit rate can continue much longer than a few hundred spins.  So, this has the same weakness as all progressions.  It's just slower because of the 40 bets per attack.

The idea is sound in that it's trying to win more on the bets you win than you lost on the bets you lost.  It's too slow for most players.

GLC

[vladir]

As far as I know this has been tested moderately by myself and others.  The final conclusion is that it is only slightly better than a flat bet.  If you go through a really bad hit rate session, it can take forever to pull out.  I think the author increases the bets too much when he starts doubling the bet sizes although if you have enough bankroll, it will recover most of the time, eventually.  I'm not saying it can't lose, just that it will take a very long time before you conclude that it can lose.

It's based on the assumption that a really bad hit rate will end within a few hundred spins and we all know that a bad hit rate can continue much longer than a few hundred spins.  So, this has the same weakness as all progressions.  It's just slower because of the 40 bets per attack.

The idea is sound in that it's trying to win more on the bets you win than you lost on the bets you lost.  It's too slow for most players.

GLC

Thanks for the great reply.

Do you know if someone had botted somthing like this, and what results they have? I know eventually it will lose... that's inevitable I guess.   A better question is how much we can expect to win between losses?

[GLC]

To the best of my knowledge it hasn't been botted and there's no set amount you can expect to win between losses.

Sorry!

GLC