Six Splits To Win!

[weddings]

Another 6 sessions on dublinbet with this, all winners.

6 sessions, 12 games, third progression once.

6 first hit splits and six sleeping splits hit.

the hits do seem to come very easily, almost too easily.

we're betting 24 numbers here and we're always told that the wheel has no memory and nothing is due. each spin is totally independent of the last etc etc etc.
24 numbers obviously equals two columns or two dozens, but playing the numbers on the columns doesn't produce anything like the strike rate that i'm experiencing here. i've not tried the numbers on the dozens as yet.

one big thing I have noticed is that tracking for 8 unique splits and then betting those 8 straight away for just one hit, has produced an easy win every session without fail, over the 25 sessions i've played this.

more results to follow.

Just to confirm you are betting fist 6 splits and last 6 splits right? Also have you considered first 12 splits?

[ewarwoowar]

hello sakis, a hit gives 6 units profit, so in 25 sessions comprising of 50 games, the profit will be 300 units.
i'm playing for fun at dublinbet just yet, not for real money.

the hits do come easily though. many sessions after tracking only consist of 2 spins.

tracking 8 unique splits and betting for 1 win has also proved successful, so far. more testing will tell!

[ewarwoowar]

weddings, we track until 12 unique splits have hit.
then we bet the FIRST six to show and the six SLEEPERS, making a total of 12.

i'll keep on with this method for now. if you want to test the first 12 splits and report back, then great!

cheers.

[ewarwoowar]

ok, another 10 sessions, 20 games, all winners.

18 of the games won on the very first spin, 1 went to the 2nd spin and 1 went to the third.

i'm using a 1, 3, 9 progression, which if it were to go down would mean 13 units x12 numbers = 156 units.
this would take 13 sessions to recoup. so far i've played 35 winning sessions without loss.
time will tell.

as a side note, tracking 8 unique splits and then betting them is also proving unbeaten, although one game went to the 6th spin. anything between 1-3 spins is proving to be the norm.

[GLC]

Hey guys,

I know that when we start tweaking, we can tweak it into oblivion.  But, I have been thinking a lot about Albertojonas' method of betting Flatino's Promised Consistent Winning Bet.  He is betting on the furthest 2 and last 2.

He has the board divided up into 9 sectors and Droganson has this system divided up into 18 sectors.  So I thought an easier way to play may be to divide it into the 12 natural streets.  That's kind of in the middle between the two systems. 

This is much easier to track and also to place bets.  I have been testing it by starting out tracking the first 9 unique streets to hit and then I bet on the first 3 that hit and the 3 that haven't hit yet.

I continue to play betting the 3 furthest and the 3 most recent or any that haven't hit plus the most recent to make up 3 streets.  Once all 12 streets have hit, I just continue to play the 3 furthest and the 3 most recent.

Once I have my 6 streets to bet on, I bet on the same streets until I have a hit.  All the while keeping track of my 12 streets so when I do get a win, I can very easily see which 6 streets to bet on next.

This is an even chance bet, so play any bet method that you would play on an e.c. D'Alembert, double D'Alembert, fibonacci, bread winner, pluscoup, 6 point divisor, martingale, grand martingale, etc...

I have tested it a few times with the grand martingale with excellent results.  I know that with the grand martingale you always have excellent results until you have a losing run, then you find out where you really stand.  I haven't had a loss yet.  we'll see how long it takes to get one.

A very safe way to play would be the double D'Alembert: 1122334455etc... on a win move 1 step to the right and on a loss move 1 step to the left.  Since we're betting 6 additional units per step, I think a 500 unit bankroll would be adequate.  Maybe more than adequate.

I'm not recommending everyone jump over and start testing this way.  I'll continue to test it when I have a chance and report the results.

If it doesn't hold up, no harm done.  Some of the other ways seems to be doing great.

Cheers,

George

[GLC]

A quick report.

3 sessions to +102, +102 and +108

All 3 sessions under 50 spins.

Bet method was the grand martingale.

Highest bet was 7 units X 6 = 42 units.  This happened 2 times in all 150 spins.

With the 108 unit session had I been betting the +1/-1 Alembert, I would have won +48 units with a high bet of 3 X6 = 18 units.  Had I been playing the +2/-2 Alembert, I would have won +24 units with a high bet of 12 units. 6 X 2.

As you can see the safer you play, the less you win, but also the smaller bankroll needed to play.  You have to find you own balance point.

George

[Droganson]

Looks good  GLC! I never would have thought of that alternative however it is less money than the splits. Hmmmm. What if your alternative was played simultaenously with the splits? I will test it! Thanks for posting!

[ewarwoowar]

it looks very promising george. are you aiming for 100pts profit or has it just worked out that way?
keep us informed on this method please and i'll keep testing the 12 splits.
i've never seen anything that hits quite as regularly as this does. maybe just a flash in the pan, i'm waiting for the brick wall!

cheers.

[ewarwoowar]

another 10 live sessions at dublinbet. 10 sessions, playing for 2 wins each session, so therefore 20 games.

playing 12 splits made up from the first 6 to hit and the 6 sleepers, after tracking 12 unique splits.

first 4 sessions all won, 8 games with 6 wins from the first six splits and 2 from the sleepers.
the first game of the 5th sesssion lost, i.e. i stopped at the 3 progression (1,3,9). it's worth noting that the bet hit on the very next spin, but i'm monitoring this as it would be 27 units laid out.
i then upped the unit value and  the second game of the 5th session won on the first spin with a first six split hitting.
the next 5 sessions all won easily on the first spins and after increasing the unit size i finished the sessions 52 units up.
on the last 5 sessions, the hits were shared out by the first six splits and the sleepers, 5 each.
more results to follow.

cheers.

[ewarwoowar]

just to add, as with the other sessions, i tracked the first 8 unique splits and virtually bet them for 1 win. they would have all won again.
that's 45 games on the trot that the first 8 splits would have produced a win within the next few spins after appearing.
in 45 games 6 spins is the longest it's taken for a repeat of one of the first unique 8 splits.

[GLC]

The streak from hell!

103 spins

Grand Martingale 5 step busted 2 X for -776.

Ended at -38 overall.  That means that I won 426 this session and lost 776 = -350 for this session.  -350 + 312 won on three other session leaves me -38 units overall.

I'm a little discouraged, but I will keep playing because I feel like this was such a bad stretch, that it can't come up too often.  I had a stretch where I lost 16 and won 2.  When you get that kind of bad luck, nothing can hang in there.

I seemed to be the one who always came up with the really bad sequences on some of Atlantis' systems also.  Bad series seem to follow me like stink on *#@!.

Oh well, it's good to see them so we know what to expect.

Hopefully I won't see something like that for a really long time.

So, this is still not a for sure system.

I'll keep you posted on how and if I recover.

As Colin says, "Keep 'er lit".  

I don't know what " 'er " is.  A candle I'll assume. :LoL:

Cheers,

George  

P.S.  I think I'll go back over this series betting 3 furthest, 3 most recent, and 2 in the middle.
That's 24 numbers (a 2:1 bet0 instead of 18 ( a 1:1 bet).  Tha'll match Ewar's method more closely.

[chrisbis]

When you look back retrospectively George (Morning from UK by the way), is there any sense
of an indicator, (that one could learn from) that you were about to have the SFH? *

*SFH=session from hell.


I know hindsight is the most wonderful thing in the whole Universe, but I just wondered if, in looking back at your play, whether you could "SEE" the moment when things were about to go pear shaped?

It could be, that in parallel with Ken's "Event" management, the same could be true for an
event that isolates out the part of a play, that given your chance to play the same hand all over again, you would do things differently!

Any thoughts George?

(And before old smart pants Jordan/VIP
(ohh very important indeed) wanders into this
crash test dummy article I have just written,
I elude to an OBVIOUS moment/indicator,
when things took a turn for the worse- aka- SFH ?)..................
thank you for e=reading J.

[GLC]

Went back over the streak from hell but instead of betting 2 streets in the middle, I just bet 4 furthest and 4 most recent.

Won +248 units. 

Progression was 1-3-9-27

Went to 27 twice but won them both.
-320 units if you lose at 27.

Too risky for my blood.  Plus, I get nervous starting off at 8 units as a minimum bet.

Chris,

No I couldn't detect anything that would signal the Apocalypse.
Just winning as usual and then 18 bets with 16 losses and 2 wins and then it goes back to winning as usual.  Go figure.

Regards,

George

[chrisbis]

Probably U need session breaks George, and more coffee!

Maybe limit the time that Ur playing "Actual", and blend into the session more "Virtual".

Its will help U to 'see' how the wheel returns are performing, against the 'desired' outcome.

The trouble with testing, is when Ur wanting the best performance from the wheel for the system under test, the wheel just doesn't know that!!-
(or the Wheel ,  just didn't receive the memo from head-office that warned the 'Wheel'-
"When George is testing- give him good results!")

So what ya should be doing, is alternating one's attack plan, and varying the bet to suit the changing conditions, & max out the R.O.I.

Not good when Ur setting out on a full-on testing session in one particular Avenue!!

Keep at 'em George!!  

[Kingspin]

I tried this  out today playing with 10p chips , I made +240 chips , seemed to be going well this morning , first session in the evening so the lot gone due to a bad game. Went too far with the progression which  eat my profit   and lost the lot plus a little  more. Many wins were hitting on spins 1 to 5 mostly .   Still it's a 1 in 3 chance of a hit no matter how much tracking. Like all systems luck is the major decider if we win or lose.

My method was the original tracking until 6 splits un hit then bet them with progression , my progression was 2 3 4 5 7 which seemed to work pretty good until I bust using a longer progression.

One thing I noticed is the number of hits on spin 1 seemed to be better than I would expect, maybe luck or maybe a combination of good luck and good system but I got lots of hits on spin 1 . I only went for 1 win then retrack after with fresh numbers at least 12 new fresh spins no back tracking!