Six Splits To Win!

[ewarwoowar]

ok, another 10 sessions playing for two wins, so 20 games, at dublinbet live wheel.

all games won again for 120 units profit.
so far i've played 55 sessions of two games and had one losing game. yes, one losing game out of 110!!
increasing the unit size on the next few games easily re-couped the loss.
as mentioned up the thread by kingspin, it's amazing how many hits are on the first spin.

also, importantly for me, is that i've gone through my 4 day rule. i've lost count of the number of systems that have looked good at first, only to tank after 4 days of playing!

again tracking the first eight unique splits and betting them for one win would have won 10 out of 10 times, although one of the games would have gone to the seventh stage of the progression.
these eight splits also tend to hit very early on, which leads me to another idea.....
tracking eight unique splits and then betting them for 1-2 spins only. if lose, re-track and increase the unit size accordingly.
based on the 10 games tonight, the eight splits hit like this:-
1 spin x4
2 spins x3
3 spins x1
4 spins x1
and one @ 7 spins.
in the 55 games i've tracked this, 7 has been the longest without a win.

food for thought.

[ewarwoowar]

another 10 sessions played as above at dublinbet live wheel.
the very first game lost and so i upped the unit value for the next 6 games to end the session over 100 points up.
the subsequent games all won.

i tracked the first eight splits again and watched them all hit again very easily.

in 7 games the splits hit again on the very next spin, 1 game took 2 spins and 2 games went to 5 spins.
these haven't lost yet in 65 games.

[Droganson]

Have not posted in a while because I've been using ewarwoowar's alternate betting method very successfully. Generated over 5,000 units of profit so far from over 500 sessions! Amazing! I use an extremely aggressive progression of 10 25 50 100 200 now since it never goes back 5 spins without a hit for me and it's doing great! I hope everything is going well for everyone else!

[ewarwoowar]

hi drog, i've (lost) two games in my tests. both would have won on the very next spin, but i just use a 1,3,9 progression and take the hit.
maybe i should be a bit more adventurous, given the rate at which the hits come.

[Kingspin]

Hi drogansan i have a question , why was the original idea of tracking until 6 splits are un hit then bet them with progression. Was this proved a looser?.
Getting 12 splits down takes twice as long and where i play at william hill you would be struggling to get the bets down on time before they spin again..

[Kingspin]

Yes but who would be insane enough to play such an highly aggressive progresion of 10 25 50 100 200 , 0 will kill your bankroll once it shows a few times , and betting on 0 to cover the bets will surely kill the profits. Few would play this in real casino i am sure.

[Proofreaders2000]

I think Droganson plays this system on RNG.

[Kingspin]

I would personally not play this on rng , no way on earth!

I quit rng real money some time back , i only play rng to give quick tests of ideas.
For quick tests of ideas rng is ok. 

[Droganson]

It is not a loser as long as you only play it once or twice per session. Yes, I use RNG casinos only. I love the RNG because it is cruel and unforgiving!

[Kingspin]

Remember your playing against a computer with rng , the picture of the wheel it shows is basically an illusion to fool you , you can lose on real wheels too but at least the wheel is not controlled by software . I have played rng a lot in the past and it took me time to see it forces losses (cheats). How sure am i  rng is a cheat well the answer is about 99.99%.

[Ron]

But u can still predict some No#with RNGs'; in a real wheel its virtually impossible.

[reincarnation]

I've been out of touch for a while and I can see many variations now.

To summarize, it started with 6 splits, then to first hit six splits and un-hit six splits, and then to 8 splits with many progressions as well. So, as per the latest testings if any, can anybody tell me which seems to look out of of the lot and with what progression?

[ewarwoowar]

hi reincarnation, i've not posted for a while on this thread because i've been busy, but also pondering which way to go with it.
yes, at first drog was talking about playing the sleeping six splits, after tracking 12 unique splits.
then after a while, we discussed playing the 6 sleepers, along with the first six that had hit.
this went very well in testing.
as a side issue, i was monitoring the viability of betting the first 8 splits to show. this also went very very well.
i had 1 losing game and then upped the value of the units i was betting in until i recouped the loss very easily.
however, at the weekend i suffered 2 losing sessions back to back and this was a big disappointment. that said, i upped the value of the units again and at the end of play had almost recouped again.
i'm torn with this because the repeaters do come and the sleepers seem to hit when they don't, but the two back to back losses were a killer.
i might try and use the first 8 hits with the sleeping 6, or possibly 7 first hits and 7 sleepers, after 11 unique hits.
it sounds like i'm all over the place with it, but i think there's mileage in this method.
be that with the amount of splts played, or how many legs of a progression used, i'm not just sure at the moment, but i'll carry on and keep the forum informed.
work in progress.

[reincarnation]

i might try and use the first 8 hits with the sleeping 6, or possibly 7 first hits and 7 sleepers, after 11 unique hits.

But, I guess the progression will be much steeper in that case..

[ewarwoowar]

absolutely, if you were to follow a progression to the end it would be a monster!
if i played the above method, i'd look to get out after just a couple of spins.
both the losing sessions i described above, would have won using the first 8 splits with the sleeping 6.