The "Statistical Imbalance" fallacy

[Kimo Li]

Kimo could you answer this please?

Yes, that can be done, a person with a high risk tolerance, no fear approach.

[Clf7]

Yes, that can be done, a person with a high risk tolerance, no fear approach.

You mean that if you play this way it is possible to f*ck the BR and its more gambling than professional? Thanks for your fast answers

[Kimo Li]

You mean that if you play this way it is possible to f*ck the BR and its more gambling than professional? Thanks for your fast answers

Of course, it's all gambling.
The safe approach is to have a 5,000.00 to make 100.00 a day, not the opposite.

[Joe]

All I can say is there are people who do and those who don't. Which are you?

lol, I think people are more interested in you giving some evidence that you're not a scammer than what I am. I'm not the one trying to sell a roulette system which defies mathematics and promises untold riches. 

But there are always gullible buyers queuing up for snake oil.

[Kimo Li]

lol, I think people are more interested in you giving some evidence that you're not a scammer than what I am. I'm not the one trying to sell a roulette system which defies mathematics and promises untold riches. 

But there are always gullible buyers queuing up for snake oil.

You must be misinformed. I am not here to promote my lessons. I do not advertise or solicit. People who are interested contact me on their own accord. The majority are vetted and turned down. In your case, I would never allow someone like you in my circle because, one you have not read my book or care to study my work. Two, your attitude certainly disqualifies you instantly.

The reason I rarely post is because of ignorant people like you. Having said that, no reason for me to further answer any questions.

[Steve]

Kimo, so the hg is $36k, is that right?

Are any of your students in forums who are earning $500k/year, pr similarly large amounts, who can support your claims?

[Clf7]

Kimo i must say this is/was the most interesting thread in 3 months 

[Kimo Li]

Kimo, so the hg is $36k, is that right?

Are any of your students in forums who are earning $500k/year, pr similarly large amounts, who can support your claims?

Yes, 36K.

Students from years ago has been active on the forums. Once they graduated they stop posting. I will ask if they are willing to stick their heads out. Most, if not all, will probably decline for anonymity reasons. 

[Steve]

Kimo, what do you have to support your theories? i.e. is there a particular principle that people can test to prove your theories as true?

What proof do you offer to anyone before they send you money?

CLF7, what makes you so sure Kimo is telling the truth?

[Clf7]

Kimo, what do you have to support your theories? i.e. is there a particular principle that people can test to prove your theories as true?

What proof do you offer to anyone before they send you money?

CLF7, what makes you so sure Kimo is telling the truth?

Because i think that its  possible to beat the game without physics or any devices involved and his book makes good Impression to me that he is a professional and not a gambler or scammer....But i get your point 100%,  in contrast to you Kimo doesnt provide any proof that his method is a working one.

[Steve]

With roulette systems for sale, you cant rely on someone's word alone. That's being gullible. You'll inevitably be scammed, or waste your time running in circles looking for the secret that doesn't exist.

[Clf7]

That middlefinger rating was a mistake,sorry.

As i said "i believe" in it so for the time its more belief/trust than actual proof.

[Steve]

Ok no problem.
My rating wasnt a mistake.

[Kimo Li]

Kimo, what do you have to support your theories? i.e. is there a particular principle that people can test to prove your theories as true?

What proof do you offer to anyone before they send you money?

CLF7, what makes you so sure Kimo is telling the truth?

I have posted a few concepts that players could test over the years.
I have no need to provide proof for someone to take a lesson. You see the ones that pays for a lesson are the ones who have done their research on their own. They have read my book. They have read my posts on various forums. They themselves come to the conclusion that I may provide a better system than those they have read on the internet.

Like CLF7, I did not solicit him. He did his research and came to the conclusion that GPM may be an option to learn. He may not qualify based on a list of my criteria.

[Kimo Li]

With roulette systems for sale, you cant rely on someone's word alone. That's being gullible. You'll inevitably be scammed, or waste your time running in circles looking for the secret that doesn't exist.

I have never asked anyone to post their methods because I have my own method that works. However, since you called me out on my method, why don't you post something that proves you approach works? Something we all can test.