The "Statistical Imbalance" fallacy

[Steve]

However, since you called me out on my method, why don't you post something that proves you approach works? Something we all can test.

I'm not the only one who can provide valid advantage play methods for roulette. But ok start with something basic: try the basic vb technique in the free video on my website. Or the free online roulette computer anyone can test. Take it further and see an in-person demo, or recordings of public demos.

Come on, you'd have to be brain dead if you weren't already aware of all that, or the validity of my methods.

But I was asking about your methods. You claim to beat RNG and have a reasonable following. But I'm not aware of anything you've posted that validates your theories, or your claims that you have the HG and beat RNG.

[Steve]

Kimo, not having proof is one thing. But so far all material I've seen from you appears dubious.

And your claims are a bit "out there". It doesn't mean they aren't true. But for any reasonable person to believe them, you'd need to provide some tangible proof.

[Kimo Li]

I'm not the only one who can provide valid advantage play methods for roulette. But ok start with something basic: try the basic vb technique in the free video on my website. Or the free online roulette computer anyone can test. Take it further and see an in-person demo, or recordings of public demos.

Come on, you'd have to be brain dead if you weren't already aware of all that, or the validity of my methods.

But I was asking about your methods. You claim to beat RNG and have a reasonable following. But I'm not aware of anything you've posted that validates your theories, or your claims that you have the HG and beat RNG.

Have you read my book? "Come on, you'd have to be brain dead if you weren't already aware of all that, or the validity of my methods."

[Kimo Li]

Kimo, not having proof is one thing. But so far all material I've seen from you appears dubious.

And your claims are a bit "out there". It doesn't mean they aren't true. But for any reasonable person to believe them, you'd need to provide some tangible proof.

I have no need to prove to the public that it works. What matters to me is for those who are willing to find out, they will be provided the proof, leap of faith.

In 1986, I met a guy in a bar who told me that he had a Dupont product that will change the industry of detailing cars, boats, and planes. He was selling a franchise. I bought it on the spot. Next day I was in Florida finalizing the deal. I made a ton of money, leap of faith. I was on the ground floor.

Everything he said was far fetch. I had the money and means to take that leap of faith. A door opened and I stepped in, changed my life.

1982, a guy told me about commercial investments in Las Vegas, using a private group of investors. I was fortunate to be at the right place at the right time. The door opened and I stepped in. Best land deal ever.

The gods give it and then take it, divorced. Sometimes a deal goes sour, such is life.

[Steve]

Just because you took a leap of faith that paid off doesn't mean the same will happen for others that send you money.

Please give a link to material that best validates your theories. ie your "book".

[Kimo Li]

Only one way to find out.

link:s://:.amazon.com/Roulette-Formula-Predict-Exact-Number/dp/1412075947/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1473614788&sr=8-1&keywords=kimo+li

link:s://:.amazon.com/European-Roulette-Book-Innovative-Strategies/dp/1425110223/ref=pd_sbs_14_1/134-0729703-4510716?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=1425110223&pd_rd_r=66256fd0-8166-460f-ae6f-a129c4c1016e&pd_rd_w=HwgrZ&pd_rd_wg=SEGU7&pf_rd_p=7cd8f929-4345-4bf2-a554-7d7588b3dd5f&pf_rd_r=5Q4Q3GBJR7D99CM9TVGM&psc=1&refRID=5Q4Q3GBJR7D99CM9TVGM

[Steve]

The only useful reviews basically state its a whole lot of theory, with nothing actually helpful.

Where can i find something solid to test and validate your claims?

[Kimo Li]

The only useful reviews basically state its a whole lot of theory, with nothing actually helpful.

Where can i find something solid to test and validate your claims?

Hence the lessons. There are keen individuals who figured out how to apply the knowledge they have read in my books, just by reading posts from this and other forums. There is no way they will ever figure out the hg without taking a lesson. Information is a commodity. Of all people, you should know.

[Steve]

Right. So I have the $36k for your hg that beats rng and makes some players $500k/year.

I would like to see proof before i send payment. Real proof.

Exactly how do we proceed?

[Steve]

Questions:

Q. Is your system purely mechanical with no guesswork? Ie mechanical if two different players see a sequence of spins, then make exactly the same bets.

Q. Is the system the same for real wheels and rng?

[Kimo Li]

Right. So I have the $36k for your hg that beats rng amd makes some players $500k/year.

I would like to see proof before i send payment. Real proof.

Exactly how do we proceed?

Sorry, one has to be vetted. You may not qualify.

[Kimo Li]

Questions:

Q. Is your system purely mechanical with no guesswork? Ie mechanical if two different players see a sequence of spins, then make exactly the same bets.

Q. Is the system the same for real wheels and rng?

A1. Mechanical. If two players see a sequence of spins, they may have different bets because the choice of strategy may be different, but both will win.

A2. System is the same for all wheels.

[Steve]

Ok. So what makes someone qualify?

There is no way they will ever figure out the hg without taking a lesson

Do you mean the $36k lesson?

What good are your books if nobody will ever figure it out without your lesson?

There are keen individuals who figured out how to apply the knowledge they have read in my books, just by reading posts from this and other forums.

I'm confused. If nobody can figure out your system from your books, what good are they?

And why when i ask for validation of your theories do you refer me to books you sell, which dont reveal anything?

Ill ask again to be clear. Exactly how can i validate your theories as true? Ie how can someone know you're not running a scam, before someone sending you $36k?

[Kimo Li]

Ok. So what makes someone qualify?

Do you mean the $36k lesson?

What good are your books if nobody will ever figure it out without your lesson?

I'm confused. If nobody can figure out your system from your books, what good are they?

And why when i ask for validation of your theories do you refer me to books you sell, which dont reveal anything?

This is what I state on my website.

"If you are the type of person who:

- does not acknowledge emails in a timely manner
- want something for nothing
- looking for a get rich quickly scheme
- lack self-discipline, integrity, and respect
- is a compulsive gambler
- is desperate for money
- have legal troubles
- have financial issues
- is self-absorbed, egotistical
- have major leaks in your life (Alcohol, drugs, lazy, to name a few)
- is uncouth, dishonest, and lies
- makes promises and break them

GPM is not for you."

The books served as an introduction (2005 and 2006). I am not foolish enough to publish the HG. It open doors to those who want to pursue the journey.

Sorry to disappoint you.

[Steve]

If two players see a sequence of spins, they may have different bets because the choice of strategy may be different, but both will win.

Your sales material speaks of predicting the exact number. Theres only one winning number in traditional roulette. Spins are independent. So the only way multiple predictions could have an edge is if your system is based on sectors. But rng doesnt have sectors.

Im seeing some pretty big questions in your logic. But let's see where it goes.

System is the same for all wheels.

The mechanisms for different wheels and different rngs are all completely different. If you had two sequences even with the same prng, the outcomes would be completely different. Not just for the next spin, but all future spins.

Can you explain this?