The "Statistical Imbalance" fallacy

[Kimo Li]

Kimo could you say why and how the outcome is random?

Why?, the outcome is random. How?, through random number generator.

[Steve]

I do not have the need to show you proof. If you don't believe or don't care to believe, so what. It really does not matter.
Continue your search. I hope you get there.

You dont, but tried, demonstrated backwards logic you couldnt explain, had nowhere to go, so played the "only I know the secret" card.

And I understood the basics long ago.

[Steve]

Why?, the outcome is random. How?, through random number generator.

So how can you win better than random but not but do and not?

You're just speaking dribble kimo, which is what i expect when someone like you gets exposed.

[Bebediktus3]

All of the scientific, math, and logically thinkers, with all of their credentials, proof, theorems, cannot fathom the idea that something outside their way of thinking is possible.

For sure is very easy to say that is some magical stick, rule - know it and you are millionaire . And these who have logical thinking and math knowledge - simply cant that understand !

Kimo - very simple is to claim on the forums, when not need something to prove... But you do all in real-time when somebody sees that.
For example, I can demonstrate spins from my roulette through skype and you can do bets accordingly your theory. If you will guess by 3STD more than random - you will prove, that your theory works.
Let's do this deal?

[Malvador]

Hi Kimo, I have read and studied your book, I like your analogy of the eclipse btw
Could you point me in the direction of what I should focus on in the process of the combination of GPM and GSM. There are an almost infinte number of eclipses but too what end? What does the eclipse show me?

Kindest

[carvigno]

For sure is very easy to say that is some magical stick, rule - know it and you are millionaire . And these who have logical thinking and math knowledge - simply cant that understand !

Go tell Copernico this one. He would have had a lot of fun listening to your argument. He had the audacity to say that the earth was not the center of the universe. At first he resisted openly publishing his views, not wishingâ€"as he confessedâ€"to risk the scorn "to which he would expose himself on account of the novelty and incomprehensibility of his theses." 
One was right everybody else wrong.

[Bebediktus3]

He had the audacity to say that the earth was not the center of the universe.

So why you are not so brave as he  ? Why you all so try to hide himself  ?  Anyone can scream online how smart is he when nobody sees, but when the matter comes that need to show, when somebody can see you - all your abilities - disappear. I, not one time met such smart guys from the internet in real casinos, till now not saw how they win...

[carvigno]

Do you think that in an environment as collaborative as this thread, do I want to explain anything?
People are eager to make a breakthrough and demand things as if they have a right to be informed. Do you think it took an easy road to come to conclusions?
If you dont study and comprehend Kimo's teachings and  tools he offers to figure out what's going on the wheel, it's like talking different  languages, nobody understanding shit.
Come on study the right stuff, you have some good hints in this thread and forum in general, and dont sit down on a couch shaking the head all the time. People pass but things dont change.
Have a nice day.

[gizmotron2]

Having said that I agree with gizmotron on that sometimes synchronistic patterns do occur and sometimes they are happen to be in a working state.
I buy into the idea that random patterns can trick you to believe there are linguistic patterns occuring that you can speak for a short window of opportunity based on the current history as it happens with you as a player in mind.

Yep, patterns and trends are just formations that you can see in your mind. In the field of psychology it is known as pareidolia. But more important there is timing. This timing stands alone from the patterns. It's seeing that a thing is in a phase of working at a specific time.  I use visual dexterity and pareidolia to see strips of data in a working phase.  The human brain can be programmed to see these associations far easier than a computer can. Proving that it can work and that timing is all important would be a daunting task for me to program as an algorithmic example of proof. I have chosen the human programming approach. It takes longer and is dependent on others doing the work for themselves. So we get different opinions regarding it. Still, it's all out there for anyone to try it out. It's free.

[Bebediktus3]

Do you think that in an environment as collaborative as this thread, do I want to explain anything?

Nobody interests in your explanations. The question was simple - you claim, that you are HG holder. If that is true, then you can easily predict the coming numbers with more than 3STD. I offer you to demonstrate your abilities on my wheel, or on some video translation from some online casino - you do that and all questions are closed. Nobody will ask how you that do, believe that it is not interesting till nobody saw that you, or Kimo can win at all !!
Till now all what you - all system players do are talks about how smarts are you !! Nothing more...

We all can talk that we all are super winners and all know what not know others, but what is benefit from these empty talks ?

[Winner]

Grown men  debating and arguing  about a little wheel .Just  bet red / black
This is what happen with religions ,My god is better then yours bla bla bla .
You either bet with the odds against you / probability or find technology to help you it’s that simple .

[Kimo Li]

For sure is very easy to say that is some magical stick, rule - know it and you are millionaire . And these who have logical thinking and math knowledge - simply cant that understand !

Kimo - very simple is to claim on the forums, when not need something to prove... But you do all in real-time when somebody sees that.
For example, I can demonstrate spins from my roulette through skype and you can do bets accordingly your theory. If you will guess by 3STD more than random - you will prove, that your theory works.
Let's do this deal?

What do you mean 3STD?

[Herby]

We observe the following colors:
Red - Green - Red

How many marbles are green and how many are red in the bag?

Hint : The bag may contain:

Red - Red - Green - Green
Or
Red - Red - Red - Green
Or
Green - Green - Green - Red

I'll give it a try:

if the bag contains: Red - Red - Green - Green
p(Red - Green - Red) = 0.5*0.5*0.5 = 0.125 = 12.5 %

if the bag contains: Red - Red - Red- Green
p(Red - Green - Red) = 3*0.25*0.25*3*0.25 = 0.140625 = 14.06 %

if the bag contains: Green - Green - Green - Red
p(Red - Green - Red) = 0.25*3*0.25*0.25 = 0.046875 = 4.9 %

So its most probable the the bag contains Red - Red - Red- Green

[Kimo Li]

So how can you win better than random but not but do and not?

You're just speaking dribble kimo, which is what i expect when someone like you gets exposed.

It is not I that is being exposed. Why don't you elaborate on your "HG"? There are many players here who want to see how you play on a daily basis and why your approach is superior.

You want everybody else to show proof. Why don't you give us your proof?

[Bebediktus3]

What do you mean 3STD?

Standart deviation...