The "Statistical Imbalance" fallacy

[gizmotron2]

Gizmo, don't be sad; look what happens to those who choose the wrong Grail.

That's right! Let the NAZI bitch choose for you.

[Kimo Li]

Gizmo, don't be sad; look what happens to those who choose the wrong Grail.
He chose... poorly.   lol

The difference between the guy who chose the wrong grail and yourselves is he had the balls to make a decision. Joe you have nothing to offer. Gizmo, you give an idea for free. Yet, you have no clear process for your method. You leave your followers guessing what to do. The HG has clear and decisive process, no ambiguities.

"Not to decide is to decide."

[Joe]

Even if you were to try and deceive me and pose as someone else, you would not make it through the vetting process.

Actually Kimo, you're wrong. Some time ago I was curious and emailed you about your system. I was duly 'vetted' and passed. You then asked me if I wanted to proceed with purchasing the system, but I declined.

[gizmotron2]

The difference between the guy who chose the wrong grail and yourselves is he had the balls to make a decision. Joe you have nothing to offer. Gizmo, you give an idea for free. Yet, you have no clear process for your method. You leave your followers guessing what to do. The HG has clear and decisive process, no ambiguities.

"Not to decide is to decide."

I sure do leave them guessing what to do. If they gain the skill then they will know exactly what to do when they guess. Unless anyone has detected a method to see where the ball is going to land, I mean in the exact slot, then all you have is a guess.  That's all you can offer your honored elites. But that leaves out the most honorable tactic yet, you can lie to them.

[Kimo Li]

Actually Kimo, you're wrong. Some time ago I was curious and emailed you about your system. I was duly 'vetted' and passed. You then asked me if I wanted to proceed with purchasing the system, but I declined.

I get a lot inquires. Many are vetted the way you were. If you have met the requirements, you were offered a lesson. The fact that you declined shows that you had an apprehension. It all sorts itself out. I did not solicit you. You came to me. Your lost.

[gizmotron2]

Actually Kimo, you're wrong. Some time ago I was curious and emailed you about your system. I was duly 'vetted' and passed. You then asked me if I wanted to proceed with purchasing the system, but I declined.

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=sf0OFZexRGs

[Kimo Li]

I sure do leave them guessing what to do. If they gain the skill then they will know exactly what to do when they guess. Unless anyone has detected a method to see where the ball is going to land, I mean in the exact slot, then all you have is a guess.  That's all you can offer your honored elites. But that leaves out the most honorable tactic yet, you can lie to them.

You have no HG. You lie to people. Saying it's free, relieves you from taking accountability.

[gizmotron2]

You have no HG. You lie to people. Saying it's free, relieves you from taking accountability.

I'm tempted. I can prove it with an algorithm that would be very difficult to write. Right now it's based on programming people. Some people have it working for them. I'm in this for the long hall. You are like a bug on the windshield that gets smacked to smithereens at 80 miles per hour. People will wonder why you sold yourself short for just $46,000 or $48,000. I forget what the going rate for the official HG is.  Talk to the hand. This is pointless.

[Kimo Li]

I'm tempted. I can prove it with an algorithm that would be very difficult to write. Right now it's based on programming people. Some people have it working for them. I'm in this for the long hall. You are like a bug on the windshield that gets smacked to smithereens at 80 miles per hour. People will wonder why you sold yourself short for just $46,000 or $48,000. I forget what the going rate for the official HG is.  Talk to the hand. This is pointless.

Excuses, excuses, write the damm thing and prove it. Shut your critics up. Very difficult translates to not happening.

[gizmotron2]

Excuses, excuses, write the damm thing and prove it. Shut your critics up. Very difficult translates to not happening.

I'm not that altruistic. I want the money. I just want to earn it. Novel choice, don't you think?

[Joe]

The difference between the guy who chose the wrong grail and yourselves is he had the balls to make a decision. Joe you have nothing to offer.

So now you're trying to make the indecisive people feel bad? well I guess you need to appeal to a wide membership, lol.
The important thing is to make the right (or at least a wise) decision, not just any decision. Given that you offer no proof of your claims, those who make the decision to buy your lessons could fairly be classed as compulsive gamblers or the desperate, which ironically is a class of person you don't want in your circle.

As for me having 'nothing to offer', well no, I don't 'offer' a holy grail without proof or any kind of evidence that it works as claimed but only riddles and contradictions. But is my presence on this forum appreciated? It would seem so. Let's try to quantify it : currently I have a rating of +78 for 682 posts, or 11.4%. You have a rating of +24 for 272 posts or 8.8%. You do the maths.

[Mister Eko]

Excuses, excuses, write the damm thing and prove it. Shut your critics up. Very difficult translates to not happening.

You want proof but you forgot to proof your claims komoli !

[carvigno]

But is my presence on this forum appreciated? It would seem so. Let's try to quantify it : currently I have a rating of +78 for 682 posts, or 11.4%. You have a rating of +24 for 272 posts or 8.8%. You do the maths.

And the winner for best member of the forum issss foorrr JOEEEE!!!!. 

[Kimo Li]

So now you're trying to make the indecisive people feel bad? well I guess you need to appeal to a wide membership, lol.
The important thing is to make the right (or at least a wise) decision, not just any decision. Given that you offer no proof of your claims, those who make the decision to buy your lessons could fairly be classed as compulsive gamblers or the desperate, which ironically is a class of person you don't want in your circle.

As for me having 'nothing to offer', well no, I don't 'offer' a holy grail without proof or any kind of evidence that it works as claimed but only riddles and contradictions. But is my presence on this forum appreciated? It would seem so. Let's try to quantify it : currently I have a rating of +78 for 682 posts, or 11.4%. You have a rating of +24 for 272 posts or 8.8%. You do the maths.

I am happy that you are well liked here. The bottom line is "if anyone snooze, they lose."

[Kimo Li]

You want proof but you forgot to proof your claims komoli !

I am not looking for proof. I am looking to see Gizmo succeed. In order to do that, he needs to program his idea. When he does that, it's no longer free.