IQ Levels

[swanson]

But how would you know when there are infinite possibilities?

When I said, ""actually I don't "know" this,"" I meant that I do not know this for sure. I am open to the possibility that a HG exists. It is just that I doubt it does, at least not without psychic-type abilities being used.

[gizmotron2]

Instead of valuating intelligence why don't you make a simple test.

1. Do you have the capacity to see if Black or Red has strong moments of domination on it's way to being the individual spins that make up 200 spins in a row?

2. If you can see moments of domination on either side can you take action that will favor you?

3. Does math or arithmetic prevent you from seeing moments of domination?

4. Does math or arithmetic prevent you from taking action that will favor you?

These questions are to identify if you have magical beliefs about math or arithmetic.

This is a very rudimentary IQ test.

[Moxy]

Do you need a high IQ to know that roulette can not be beaten using systems, which do not increase the accuracy of the prediction?

I can understand playing roulette for fun. I also think some people are desperate for money so are willing to try anything, which I can still have empathy for.

But I fail to comprehend those that are convinced that spins are not independent of each other. And the forum is full of them. Even as a hobby, it has to be one of the strangest hobbies. They are literally trying to make 1+ 1 = 3.

Clearly all these people can't be wrong, can they? Why waste your life doing the impossible.

I mean no disrespect, I am just confused at what I see on this forum.

Well...  You haven't met me yet.

[precogmiles]

I can see it has got worse around here.

[pepper]

I respectfully disagree. It has gone from nothing to nothing. Nothing gained; nothing lost.

[pepper]

There was a whole lot more that was lost than gained, because you can't make any progress when you have a lot of pressure on you, e.g., people thinking they "need" to find a way to beat roulette for money due to financial hardship. These people may just be stacking the deck against themselves, unless you do better under pressure.

[FreeRoulette]

Do you need a high IQ to know that roulette can not be beaten using systems, which do not increase the accuracy of the prediction?

I can understand playing roulette for fun. I also think some people are desperate for money so are willing to try anything, which I can still have empathy for.

But I fail to comprehend those that are convinced that spins are not independent of each other. And the forum is full of them. Even as a hobby, it has to be one of the strangest hobbies. They are literally trying to make 1+ 1 = 3.

Clearly all these people can't be wrong, can they? Why waste your life doing the impossible.

I mean no disrespect, I am just confused at what I see on this forum.

I think it is more about what system comes closest to the win. The odds do not change, but do you think the systems produce the same results? Flat bet $2 on black for 100 spins and $2 martingale on black for the same 100 spins. Do they both make the same profit? 

[pepper]

I think it is more about what system comes closest to the win. The odds do not change, but do you think the systems produce the same results? Flat bet $2 on black for 100 spins and $2 martingale on black for the same 100 spins. Do they both make the same profit? 

Both these methods are stupid. The martingale is stupid because you will end up risking a large amount of money for a few dollars. The flat bet is safer, but you are still a sucker due to the house edge.

[pepper]

I'm sorry to say that this and that is stupid, but it's hard not to when people are falling for the oldest tricks in the book.

[FreeRoulette]

Both these methods are stupid. The martingale is stupid because you will end up risking a large amount of money for a few dollars. The flat bet is safer, but you are still a sucker due to the house edge.

But do you agree that one method is better than the other? What you are saying is that even the best method loses to the house, but what is the best method? That is the game of systems.

[Steve]

But do you agree that one method is better than the other?

Basically, one "system" is no better than another. This is what most people don't understand.

I explained it in my videos: every losing system is just a mess of random bets with random bet sizes, following logic that only makes sense to the player.

So while you think your system is awesome, it has the same win rate as random and changes nothing. And if the win rate is random, betting progression is just random bet size on random spins.

This is all OLD NEWS.

For fuck sake, I mean not you specifically... I have been saying the same thing for years. Not just me though. I mean anyone with understanding of basic information.

Why on gambling forums are basic facts so unknown? Especially when they are shoved in faces and undeniably true? If you talk about this stuff to any professional in this industry, they laugh at system players and gamblers. Wake up.

But we have bigger problems. Ignorance and stupidity is far more harmful with global issues at the moment.

[FreeRoulette]

Basically, one "system" is no better than another. This is what most people don't understand.

I explained it in my videos: every losing system is just a mess of random bets with random bet sizes, following logic that only makes sense to the player.

So while you think your system is awesome, it has the same win rate as random and changes nothing. And if the win rate is random, betting progression is just random bet size on random spins.

This is all OLD NEWS.

For fuck sake, I mean not you specifically... I have been saying the same thing for years. Not just me though. I mean anyone with understanding of basic information.

Why on gambling forums are basic facts so unknown? Especially when they are shoved in faces and undeniably true? If you talk about this stuff to any professional in this industry, they laugh at system players and gamblers. Wake up.

But we have bigger problems. Ignorance and stupidity is far more harmful with global issues at the moment.

Even though all systems lose, it is still fun to try. Even math professionals with PHDs claim the solution to the Monty hall problem was wrong, until it was proved correct with computers. Plus wheel bias is a thing.

[Steve]

Even though all systems lose, it is still fun to try

Bending over for casino operators and being ignorant about what they're doing to your ASS is not what I'd consider fun.

Understand they laugh at the ignorance of gamblers.

Even math professionals with PHDs claim the solution to the Monty hall problem was wrong, until it was proved correct with computers.

It's an interesting illusion but the math isn't complicated. Just like roulette.

Plus wheel bias is a thing.

I know all about it. But there are better ways.

I'm not against systems. i'm against repeating the same old bullshit, and calling it "fun".

[gizmotron2]

I'm not against systems. i'm against repeating the same old bullshit, and calling it "fun".

Hahaha, LOL, I gamble for entertainment. It's fun to maybe hit a jackpot. It's even more fun to give it all back. I actually like losing.

[precogmiles]

It's even more fun to give it all back. I actually like losing.

Interesting.