Roulette has no memory but statistics have different opinion!

[swanson]

Every system loses in the long-run

[Steeefan2014]

Every system loses in the long-run

Define long run!

[swanson]

Define long run!

I cannot define this. For a flat bet, I can't imagine being in profit after 5,000 spins. Of coarse, people do win the lottery, so I suppose someone can even get lucky and always win.

[RayManZ]

What the heck (****) is MPR?

link:://:.rouletteplayers.org/register

[swanson]

Is MPR really random?

[gizmotron2]

There was another player there but I never saw his bets. So how does this prove anything?

[ati]

It doesn't prove anything, because you have only played 40 spins. link:://:.rouletteplayers.org/leaderboard

If you maintain the same win rate for 400 spins, people are going to say: Okay...carry on...

After 4000 spins and a positive win rate people might get interested in what you say. But still it won't be enough. It can easily be luck.
These simulations will not prove anything. I have had quite a few system tests in excel that had a positive win rate after thousands of spins, but most of them were a result of simple luck.
If you could maintain an extraordinary win rate, say 2.0 or above over thousands of spins, then I guess people would be very interested in what you do.

[gizmotron2]

How do you know I only played 40 spins?

So I went back to see if I could find information about my play and I made another $100.

[ati]

How do you know I only played 40 spins?

Click on this link link:://:.rouletteplayers.org/leaderboard
hit control+F and search for your name

[gizmotron2]

Click on this link link:://:.rouletteplayers.org/leaderboard
hit control+F and search for your name

Cool, I just did another session and made it to $300+

[gizmotron2]

No proof of anything here but I'm already in  the top 20% This is fun. I was so bored with all the stay at home stuff.

[precogmiles]

No proof of anything here but I'm already in  the top 20% This is fun. I was so bored with all the stay at home stuff.

Good start. Come back on there I want to see you play. I'll be on there for the next few hours.

[gizmotron2]

Good start. Come back on there I want to see you play. I'll be on there for the next few hours.

"What the fvck, over."  How can you see me play? I want to see you play too?

[gizmotron2]

Sort of fun. I moved up in my win rate even though I descended at one point in the session. Gads, a plus $700 increase when I was only going after $100 in the fourth session. I'm up over a $1000, 20% increase in bankroll on the first day. And I hit it twice in one session.

[cht]

Yes cht, your graph of 37 bets has convinced me. I've been wrong about gambler's fallacy and independent spins all these years and feel such a fool now you've proved that gambler's fallacy is itself a fallacy. 

This post is not for you Joe.

This post is for those(especially my chat buddies, this one is for you) who look for a basis why it works. The underlying principle.

The 2nd Law of thermodynamics states that,

"the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time, and is constant if and only if all processes are reversible. Isolated systems spontaneously evolve towards thermodynamic equilibrium, the state with maximum entropy."

Degree in Mechanical Engineering.

I made the connection between this law of thermodynamics and the process of numbers generation by prng or the real dealer and wheel. Designed the bet selection in line with this law. Timed the bet when this law is most effective.

It don't win all the time. As can be seen in the 2 graphs. But it naturally ends the same way in maximum entropy state.

Look up this principle of thermodynamics and educate yourself about entropy. Match the game played with this principle. There's much more than the game I revealed. This much I have given.

Cheers
CHT