System that passed 400 000 Random spins.

[precogmiles]

Negative progression is a no no.
Flatbet, then some people might be interested.

You know Flatbet for 400000 spins is impossible.

Why ask him for the impossible.

Progression only makes sense when you know you have an edge.

If his repeater system does have a genuine edge then he needs to demonstrate that.

[cht]

You know Flatbet for 400000 spins is impossible.

Why ask him for the impossible.

Progression only makes sense when you know you have an edge.

If his repeater system does have a genuine edge then he needs to demonstrate that.

You showed your ignorance with your post.
Impossible and edge in the same post.

If the bet has no edge flatbetted in your words impossible, can you explain how to derive edge played with a negative progression ?

[ignatus]

Well? I BE DAMNED! haha This is first test FLATBET. (Although the betselection little changed, in the code, still same system/principle)... (played with 5u bets)

[nichedelico]

Ok flatbet is impressive. You took ideas from last posts on repeaters or totally different way?

[ignatus]

Ok flatbet is impressive. You took ideas from last posts on repeaters or totally different way?

it´s not much modified, (same system) as i said, i cannot tell much more:S

[cht]

Well? I BE DAMNED! haha This is first test FLATBET. (Although the betselection little changed, in the code, still same system/principle)... (played with 5u bets)

Well done Ignatius. 👍

You hv proven that your Flatbet strategy "might" return an edge for these 10000 spins.

It's definitely not the same as random bets.
It's definitely not impossible.
It can't be brushed off as due to LUCK.
It's not due to programming mistake.

These are bullshit rubbish spewed on forum by u know who.

Chew your heart out it can be done.

[ignatus]

your Flatbet strategy "might" return an edge

we´ll see, yes i do more testings and post results...

[Steeefan2014]

it´s not much modified, (same system) as i said, i cannot tell much more:S

Hmmm, might be my post? 

[ignatus]

I think i got close to the "Final Version" Here (FLATBET).... About the sellingprice, now, (not sure) but i´d say a minimum of 300-500$..now. hm

[Mister Eko]

You ended break even after 75 000 spins, and you wanna sell it for 500?? Rather share the idea, then maybe we can imorove it to make it ultimate hg. Then maybe you will get some donations.

[cht]

You ended break even after 75 000 spins, and you wanna sell it for 500?? Rather share the idea, then maybe we can imorove it to make it ultimate hg. Then maybe you will get some donations.

This proposal makes sense.

It's very difficult to devise a systems betting strategy that has a positive edge.
We all hv tried and failed.
Based on the content on forum there's nothing here that grants a positive edge. Nothing.
So, good proposal to pool your brains as one work together.
As a group you might get lucky.

[Steeefan2014]

You ended break even after 75 000 spins, and you wanna sell it for 500?? Rather share the idea, then maybe we can imorove it to make it ultimate hg. Then maybe you will get some donations.

Nobody is forcing you to play 75k spins. Not even 30k spins. You can stop whenever you want. It's his product, it's his effort, he sells it with whatever he wants.

[Steeefan2014]

This proposal makes sense.

It's very difficult to devise a systems betting strategy that has a positive edge.
We all hv tried and failed.
Based on the content on forum there's nothing there that grants a positive edge. Nothing.
So, good proposal to pool your brains as one work together.

In a perfect world, it would be a great idea. But tell that to the ones that say that they have the perfect betting method and progression but they will not share it. Just... because...

[cht]

In a perfect world, it would be a great idea. But tell that to the ones that say that they have the perfect betting method and progression but they will not share it. Just... because...

This negative progression thing, get rid of it.
It's an addiction to gambling.

For negative progression to return positive edge it requires a pre-known fixed max variance. There's no such thing with roulette spins. Reality check.

[Steeefan2014]

This negative progression thing, get rid of it.
It's an addiction to gambling.

For negative progression to return positive edge it requires a pre-known fixed max variance. There's no such thing with roulette spins. Reality check.

Where did I say something about negative progression???