System passed 1 MILLION Random spins.

[Mister Eko]

so far...hmm

What hm. 267 000 SPINS  and win 900 units? 267 000 spins around with a every day 200 spins/8hour is 3 and half year continuosly playing every day 8 hours. Rather work...

Ignatus, I said many times, that all your systems will crash. Why you searchin all your systems with cyrcle? Why u use tese progressions like 1 2 5 15 25 45 105? Rather build up a strategy. I did these codings around 2 years ago for 2 motnhs, then I admitted, that all will crash. Do yu wanna do this in your whole life? Wha is your goal ? Every new day you post new losing HG with horrible pictures. I dont wanna to make you fold up this, I respect you for your work, I jsut wanna help you, that in thsi way you will neevr get the winning method, if you wull not sticck to your best method, and make it winner with STRATEGY, WINGOALS, PLANS etcc etc etc. Finding a winning way is hard, but if yo uwill circle your methods roundly the same again and again, it will move you absolutely nowhere.

Jus an advice..and yes I know the answer. ..(yes? well? ..)

regards
ekko

[ignatus]

What hm. 267 000 SPINS 

Well. mr. Eko, pls show me a FLATBET system that pass 250 000 random spins (with a positive outcome) -__-

[Mister Eko]

Well. mr. Eko, pls show me a FLATBET system that pass 250 000 random spins (with a positive outcome) -__-

And what? You drop it down, and bring tomorrow another HG.

[ignatus]

And what? You drop it down, and bring tomorrow another HG.

if you got nothing better to say, then pls stop talking or create your own thread/system thank you.

[Mister Eko]

if you got nothing better to say, then pls stop talking or create your own thread/system thank you.

Ok. Hope once you will realize that I am right, and then maybe you will be close to the real milking method. And of course not with 1 5 25 65 100 300 500 1300. Until then this will lead you nowhere.

Peace.

[ignatus]

Ok. Hope once you will realize that I am right, and then maybe you will be close to the real milking method. And of course not with 1 5 25 65 100 300 500 1300. Until then this will lead you nowhere.

Peace.

I am FLATBETTING now. pls......just give up now.

[ati]

ignatus, people don't want to attack you, but it's pretty obvious that you have an addiction. Don't take that in a negative way, most people have addictions or bad habits that they can't stop. Just look at how many years you have been posting systems, but yo will never find a winner.

I'm sure deep down you know that an actual winning system chart is not a sine wave that happens to be in the positive when you stop the simulation. And no one, not even you would play the same system for real money for tens of thousands of spins just to break even, because you 'know' that after 100 thousand spins you will be in the positive. And as I said long time ago, a human cannot play the same way as a simulation does. The RX doesn't care if you lost 2 months salary in the past 10 thousand spins, when the progression gets out of hand, it can bet your month's salary without hesitation.

[ignatus]

human cannot play the same way as a simulation does.

That´s correct. This system is meant to play with a RX-BOT since tracking time takes too long.

[huskerdu]

IGNATUS, i'm watching you for a long time as you are trying to find a winning system.
I respect your efforts and your contribution to this forum.
But i think you are making 2 major mistakes:
1. Most of your systems have extremely offensive progressions which nobody is willing to bet.
2. You base your systems exclusively on the long run of hundrends of thousands of spins without watching the short run chops.
What I mean is this:
I don't care if a system in 400.000 spins will be a winning system, even though if the line is going continuslyy up,  because if untill we reach the 400.000 spins there are too many chops of let's say 100 spins where we lose all our bankroll, and if those chops are many times continuous, this system is useless.
Nobody can play 400.000 spins if in the meantime he will lose hundreds of times all his bankroll, even if he knows that in the end he will win.
But if he knows that e.g. in 10 sessions of let's say 50 - 100 spins the winning sessions will be more than the losing sessions, and the money he will earn from the winning sessions will be more than the money he will lose from the losing sessions, he will play it.
What I'm trying to say is that not only you, but everybody who tests systems on RX  are doing this mistake:
They care for the line to go up for hundrends of thousands of spins without observing the chops of e.g. 100 spins.
A human being, if plays every day  systematically  roulette in order to win, he can play only for some hours per day, some dozens of sessions of 30 or 50 or 100 spins.  No more.
So what matters is not observing a huge line of 400.000 spins, but observing  hundreds of lines of e.g. one or two dozens of  sessions of 50-100 spins each. No more.
So, I think maybe all of you RX guru with your priceless  contribution to this forum , should review your kind of test.
Try to focus testing the systems on how many spins a systematic player can play per day. For example hundreds of continuous sessions of e.g. 100 spins until reach 500 - 1000 spins. End of test. Test again another 500 - 1.000 spins. And so on.....
Just my humble opinion.
Thanks again IGNATUS for your efforts so many years , I'll keep watching you with great interest as i do so many years so far.

[winforus]

IGNATUS you are a programmer right? In theory, you should be be very good at math and have solid fundamentals under your belt.

It doesn't make sense to me, that you don't seem to understand the basics of roulette - odds and payouts. Maybe Ati is right and you have an addiction - which is blinding you from seeing some basic things.

Where you are going is a dead-end, unfortunately. My advise is to hit a reset button, and be honest with yourself -and go back to learning the basics/fundamentals. The time that you are wasting on creating these systems (that all fail and will fail in practice), could be put for better use. You need to sit down and really re-evaluate some things.

[Roulettebeater]

Ok. Hope once you will realize that I am right, and then maybe you will be close to the real milking method. And of course not with 1 5 25 65 100 300 500 1300. Until then this will lead you nowhere.

Peace.

It would be great if you tell us more about your so-called “real milking methods”

[Steeefan2014]

It would be great if you tell us more about your so-called “real milking methods”

[Steve]

Please don't post self-love instructions.

[Steeefan2014]

Please don't post self-love instructions.

Not even selfie-love instructions

[precogmiles]

IGNATUS you are a programmer right? In theory, you should be be very good at math and have solid fundamentals under your belt.

It doesn't make sense to me, that you don't seem to understand the basics of roulette - odds and payouts. Maybe Ati is right and you have an addiction - which is blinding you from seeing some basic things.

Where you are going is a dead-end, unfortunately. My advise is to hit a reset button, and be honest with yourself -and go back to learning the basics/fundamentals. The time that you are wasting on creating these systems (that all fail and will fail in practice), could be put for better use. You need to sit down and really re-evaluate some things.

From what I have read he doesn't seem to care. His passion in life is to make roulette system, regardless if they win or not.

Fir a normal person, It is hard to get in the mind if someone who believes 1+1=3.