System passed 1 MILLION Random spins.

[Ross]

"IGNATUS, i'm watching you for a long time as you are trying to find a winning system.
I respect your efforts and your contribution to this forum.
But i think you are making 2 major mistakes:"

I agree with this comment but keep trying Ignatus.

[Moxy]

And what? You drop it down, and bring tomorrow another HG.

You must be in the petty and entitled faction I just described.

[Moxy]

...

[Elite]

I can do program any logic and then test that on bulk of data.Means all spins in a file and just upload in system .I will do this free if someone has really a better logic .

[ignatus]

I can do program any logic and then test that on bulk of data.Means all spins in a file and just upload in system .I will do this free if someone has really a better logic .

I don´t understand what you mean by this? I clearly explained the rules. You wait for X number for ("Repeats") After X Numbers of Repeats (in this case best results was (14-15 Repeats) 15 that is) THEN you will bet ALL numbers that have Been noted down (ALL numbers Hit by the 15 REPEATS from the Last 10 spins)

[Steve]

Ignatus if you focused on new approaches, you'd have a better chance of finding the hg.

You're still trying approaches that are guaranteed to lose, because you don't understand why.

All your time is being wasted. You're beating off a dead horse.

[Bigbroben]

Steve , do you know if there are any spin database that tell other variables than the landing nr, such as the nr where the ball was released or spinning time?

[Steve]

I have lots of that from players, 100k+ but i cant use that data for a few reasons. You are on the right track. You never know what variables are actually predictable enough and which count. It isnt always obvious.

[Mister Eko]

Ignatus if you focused on new approaches, you'd have a better chance of finding the hg.

You're still trying approaches that are guaranteed to lose, because you don't understand why.

All your time is being wasted. You're beating off a dead horse.

Yes. He has to understand, that winrate means nothing, useless to write 80-90% winrate, while the 10-20% take all winnings back. 6-7 years, and doing the same, just does not want to learn, or accept the fact, what we are saying here.

[Joe]

He has to understand, that winrate means nothing

I keep telling him that, but he believes it's the most important thing about a system. I think he just likes creating and testing systems, and nothing wrong with that I suppose. Maybe we're being too hard on him? Everyone should have a hobby. 

[Steve]

95% of people here are in no position to criticize his methods. Theirs make the same mistakes.

[Proofreaders2000]

Ok, lemme see.  Ignatus uses a bot to get a high hit-rate. 
Steve sells a computer.  Not much difference I'd say.

[Joe]

Not much difference I'd say.

There's a world of difference. The fact that both use computers is a red-herring, because either approach could be applied without one. Steve uses proven principles of physics to predict the next spin whereas Ignatus uses - what? past spins and progressions based on fallacies. It's chalk and cheese.

[Steve]

Ok, lemme see.  Ignatus uses a bot to get a high hit-rate. 
Steve sells a computer.  Not much difference I'd say.

Wow ok. If you want a high hit rate, just bet every number.

If you want random bet accuracy, use almost every system, including yours and ingatus'.

If you want to change the odds and win consistently, consider cause and effect, as AP does.

Big difference. Learn the basics.

And my computers be purchased, but any serious player can get them free and split winnings.

[Proofreaders2000]

If you want random bet accuracy, use almost every system, including yours and Ignatus'.-Steve

I do ok.  Haven't lost a dime of my own money in years.