System passed 1 MILLION Random spins.

[cht]

Steve uses proven principles of physics to predict the next spin

Can you be specific tell us what proven physics you talk about?
Physics and equations, not bs.

[Joe]

Sure. There is plenty of detailed technical stuff here :

link:://:.roulette.gmxhome.de/index.html

Download the PDF which covers the relevant differential equations etc from the bottom of this page (roulettephysics) :

link:://:.roulette.gmxhome.de/theory.htm

[Joe]

More here :

link:s://:.newscientist.com/article/mg21428644-500-roulette-beater-spills-physics-behind-victory/

And here is the paper by Small & Tse, who are mentioned in the above article :

link:://cktse.eie.polyu.edu.hk/pdf-paper/Chaos-1209.pdf

[Steve]

Physics and equations, not bs.

You dont need to understand the equations. Just observe things like dominant diamonds. But you don't need to have dominant diamonds for an edge, although other calculations must be done, and other requirements met.

[Steve]

 i think most players here should focus on the basics of roulette for now. They still aren't being understood by about 80% of people here.

[cht]

Sure. There is plenty of detailed technical stuff here :

link:://:.roulette.gmxhome.de/index.html

Download the PDF which covers the relevant differential equations etc from the bottom of this page (roulettephysics) :

link:://:.roulette.gmxhome.de/theory.htm

You somehow believe rc algos for sale run such physics differential equations.
I believe not.
And you know i'm right.

[Steve]

Cht, those documents explain the physics. The algorithms are quite different. Most computers have very basic algorithms. Besides, just look at things like dominant diamonds and vb. its not rocket science ya know.

[Joe]

You somehow believe rc algos for sale run such physics differential equations.
I believe not.
And you know i'm right.

Nice bait and switch. You asked for equations, I gave you equations. Stop trolling.

Equations often make even simple ideas look complex, and any formulas can be implemented as algorithms.

You claim to have a winning system so why are you determined to trash AP? Why not just be happy that you're winning? And if you want recognition for your achievement you know what to do.

[cht]

You claim to have a winning system so why are you determined to trash AP? Why not just be happy that you're winning? And if you want recognition for your achievement you know what to do.

My purpose is not to trash AP.
AP at the level that's discussed on forums is rubbish.
RC for sale without physics differential equations.

Now people reading this know the truth.

I revealed the spin for spin watered down game version to one member on this forum. I believe he's challenged how I played the session. Remember, wins flatbet.
(Note - you hv my permission to discuss with your private group)

The solution is beyond ordinary folks.

No desire to gain recognition on forum boards.
Profits is my validation.

[cht]

Delete

[Steve]

Cht, what experience do you have with roulette computers?

None at all, right?

[cht]

My purpose is not to trash AP.
AP at the level that's discussed on forums is rubbish.
RC for sale without physics differential equations.

Now people reading this know the truth.

I revealed the spin for spin watered down game version to one member on this forum. I believe he's challenged how I played the session. Remember, wins flatbet.
(Note - you hv my permission to discuss with your private group)

The solution is beyond ordinary folks.

No desire to gain recognition on forum boards.
Profits is my validation.

Revealed to a 2nd member, I'm in generous mood.
Let's see if they can build upon it.

[Steve]

Cht, what experience do you have with roulette computers?

None at all, right?

Cht you avoided the question.