Repeaters don't exist, stop chasing shadows

[precogmiles]

I've gone through the last decade of forum posts and it is sad that most have been chasing shadows.

To solve any problem you must define your ontology correctly.

The problem we are trying to solve in roulette is to guess the next number accurately.

Roulette is a random game.

'Repeater' is a label given to a pattern within a session.

Patterns do not exist, they are descriptions.

For example, in physics speed does not exist, it is a description. It's formula is distance / time.

Unless you understand what is causing speed to increase or decrease you will be chasing shadows in your physics.

Now if we apply the same logic to roulette we have to find what causes repeaters and sleepers.

So what is the tree ( which exists ) that is causing the shadow (Repeaters and sleepers)?

The answer is Regression to the mean. RTM is an actual force of nature. We see it very clearly in random games like roulette.

Now we can being to solve the problem of roulette. How do we interact with RTM so that we can predict the outcomes more accurately?

I believe that forms of meditation can allow us to access the force and feel the force of RTM. Through synchronisation with this force we are able to make RTM more comprehensible.

RTM is not just a statistical idea, it is a force of nature similar to gravity. All of these forces are part of a deeper reality. These forces are the way that deeper reality manifests itself.

So stop chasing shadows look at what really exists.

[gizmotron2]

Roulette is a random game.
'Repeater' is a label given to a pattern within a session.
Patterns do not exist, they are descriptions.

It is one thing to flog your psychic abilities. It is another to bury yourself in the part. Patterns do exist. Where do you get off proclaiming that they don't exist. It's comical. This is a pattern of attention whoring. That does not exist either.

[precogmiles]

It is one thing to flog your psychic abilities. It is another to bury yourself in the part. Patterns do exist. Where do you get off proclaiming that they don't exist. It's comical. This is a pattern of attention whoring. That does not exist either.

Go to the dictionary and find the definition of pattern.

Patterns are not things.

This is simple stuff.

[Steeefan2014]

Precog, I respect your way of play, I got nothing against it, if it works for you - go go!

But to say that repeaters don't exist... my friend, that's stupid! Really stupid! And you know this! Mathematically speaking, in 38 spins of a single zero roulette, do you have repeaters or not?

Before you answer... I rest my case!

[precogmiles]

Precog, I respect your way of play, I got nothing against it, if it works for you - go go!

But to say that repeaters don't exist... my friend, that's stupid! Really stupid! And you know this! Mathematically speaking, in 38 spins of a single zero roulette, do you have repeaters or not?

Before you answer... I rest my case!

You misunderstood what I mean.

Let me be clearer.

In extremely hot and sunny environments it sometimes makes sense to use an umbrella to create a shadow so that we can get some shade from the sun.

Here a shadow is an attribute of the umbrella. A shadow can not exist in and of itself.

The same for repeaters these are attributes of RTM.

The wheel exists, the ball exists, but repeaters do not exist.

If repeaters exist so do half repeaters or half sleepers. I guess orange repeaters also exist too then? Patterns are not things.

[gizmotron2]

Go to the dictionary and find the definition of pattern.

Patterns are not things.

This is simple stuff.

My gut feeling is that you are trying to hard. It's like a young man that tries too hard to fall in love. You can be the "Amazing Kreskin" if you just relax and enjoy your special gift.

Don't see this it will wreck your impression:

What are the odds of getting 7 heads in a row?
1 in 128
I know if you flip a coin 7 times, the odds of getting 7 heads in a row is 1 in 27 or 1 in 128. 

.5 x .5 x .5 x .5 x .5 x .5 x.5 = 0.007813

[winforus]

Precogmiles - You couldn't have said it any better - I have also noticed that 90% of the posts for the last 10+ years are all beating a dead horse , it's a complete dead end.

By seeing this, you understand why casinos make millions. 99% of the gamblers have a similar mindset, but in the casinos it's even a level lower for an average gambler.

It's either plain stupidity or stubbornness - unwilling to let go of the old ways and to try something new.

[precogmiles]

My gut feeling is that you are trying to hard. It's like a young man that tries too hard to fall in love. You can be the "Amazing Kreskin" if you just relax and enjoy your special gift.

Don't see this it will wreck your impression:

What are the odds of getting 7 heads in a row?
1 in 128
I know if you flip a coin 7 times, the odds of getting 7 heads in a row is 1 in 27 or 1 in 128. 

.5 x .5 x .5 x .5 x .5 x .5 x.5 = 0.007813

Gizmo, good for you. Keep reading randomness.

I don't know where the hostility is coming from.

It seems you are over sensitive when it comes to anyone talking about 'patterns'. Get over it.

[precogmiles]

Precogmiles - You couldn't have said it any better - I have also noticed that 90% of the posts for the last 10+ years are all beating a dead horse , it's a complete dead end.

By seeing this, you understand why casinos make millions. 99% of the gamblers have a similar mindset, but in the casinos it's even a level lower for an average gambler.

It's either plain stupidity or stubbornness - unwilling to let go of the old ways and to try something new.

I agree 100%, it is extremely strange. It doesn't take a genius to see 1+1=3 is wrong, this is basic stuff.

[gizmotron2]

It seems you are over sensitive when it comes to anyone talking about 'patterns'. Get over it.

No, this my command post. I'm the one to tell when to lighten up.  And BTW, patterns exist in nature too.

[gizmotron2]

Here a few examples: "In biology, natural selection can cause the development of patterns in living things for several reasons, including camouflage, sexual selection, and different kinds of signalling, including mimicry and cleaning symbiosis."

and: "In nature, equiangular spirals occur simply because the forces that create the spiral are in equilibrium, and are often seen in non-living examples such as spiral arms of galaxies and the spirals of hurricanes. Fibonacci spirals, Golden spirals and golden ratio-based spirals often appear in living organisms."

[precogmiles]

No, this my command post. I'm the one to tell when to lighten up.  And BTW, patterns exist in nature too.

Sad. Just go back to reading random.

Patterns are not things, they don't exist as tangible entities. Patterns are descriptions of how things are orangized.

[gizmotron2]

Sad. Just go back to reading random.

Patterns are not things, they don't exist as tangible entities. Patterns are descriptions of how things are orangized.

Bwahaha! boy am I glad that was all cleared up.

[precogmiles]

Bwahaha! boy am I glad that was all cleared up.

Yes we have greeded that "Patterns do not exist, they are descriptions."

Thanks for wasting my time.

[gizmotron2]

Thanks for wasting my time.

I'm glad I have the power to keep you here.