Repeaters don't exist, stop chasing shadows

[huskerdu]

Physics is another illusion. Casinos have already taken care of this with those diamonds across the wheel.

[cht]

Betting with the belief that random has limits is too superficial to exploit.

Simple example, 20 consecutive reds bet black.

This type of random has limits bet give no edge.

That's why bets relying on x steps negative progression is a sure fail.

Ignatius and the progression junkies, you're wasting your time and life.

[cht]

 Betting based on statistical count yields no edge.

Trend following statistical count bet example,
5reds bet red

Or, trend reversal statistical count bet example,
5reds bet black.

Both statistical count bet won't work.

[cht]

Stochastical calculus won't work.

[gizmotron2]

Betting for or against spin "patterns" won't work.

Once again I must completely agree with you. But using patterns and trends as an excuse or method to make a bet selections can be a useful tool to get to the only situational awareness that can help you win. You must discover when your bet selections are working and when they are not. So when your selections are working in a swarm or in a condition of dominating then they are also looking like the trend or pattern is working. So all this is coincidental and a best guess. It's far better than expecting a probability to kick in when you want it to. You can't know how long a win streak will last. It's just a guess. But you can be sure that a win streak will not end during a losing streak. With math you don't get a guess or a prediction.

[cht]

Physics is another illusion. Casinos have already taken care of this with those diamonds across the wheel.

When anyone claim physics,

Ask him for the physics content.

More often than not "physics" roulette players quote the word physics with zero physics content.

If it was that easy, physicists collaborate with mech engineers to beat this game. An obvious threat to the casino business.

[gizmotron2]

Betting based on statistical count yields no edge.

Trend following statistical count bet example,
5reds bet red

Or, trend reversal statistical count bet example,
5reds bet black.

Both statistical count bet won't work.

Yep, once it becomes rule based it will run right into a sequence that kills it dead.

[cht]

AP is a crude form of  physics plus mech eng.
Another bs.

[gizmotron2]

Let me make this as simple as possible. It's just a guess. Just in case you don't know this yet a consistent bet selection like betting only on red will cause up and down waves in the results graph if you are flat betting each spin.  Now all you need to do is to figure out a way to exploit that. Make up your own way. I did.

[cht]

 I've covered everything.

About precognition, as a non-believer, I have no intent to ridicule followers. No comment.

Are we all wrong?

Yes.

Accept this yes answer,

Or,

Bang your head on the wall.

It's your choice.

[cht]

The problem we are trying to solve in roulette is to guess the next number accurately.

This is incorrect.
It does not necessarily be the next spin.

Next spin applies only to EC bets.

You have doz, col, lines, streets and so on with different number of spins.

[Kattila]

You have been chasing your tail for 10 years.

After 10 years do you have a solution in how to beat roulette?

No?

You are a clown. Enjoy chasing shadows.

Clown? Chassing shadows, what movie is that....
Must be that movie where the clown saw the next roulette number in his dream.
Mister high(chiken) IQ level, i like to play (when RNG/ airball) pattern based systems, and
i have my Solution and it s based  on dealer signature not on  *i see the future* games,
not shadows,  not pregointuguessitions.

You started all this sh*t  when named( in other thread ) all system players junkies and
low IQ people.   From that my attitude toward you ....i don  t really care if you win or lose with your stuff.
Happy winnings but not virtual ones.

[gizmotron2]

The problem we are trying to solve in roulette is to guess the next number accurately.

So says the brain. I don't think so. I beat Roulette because I win the number of bets out of 100 to 200 spins that I should and I lose the larger number of those bets that I should lose. For an example I win 40 bets out of 100. I lose 60 bets out of the same 100. I just don't fund half of those lost bets. The next number is pointless. What matters are the obvious win streaks and the obvious losing streaks. If you really have psychic capabilities how come you can't see losing streaks? Does your skill only look forward the length of the next spin? I'll bet in a real peer reviewed psychological research study you are a fake. That all this is a confirmed delusion.

[cht]

The only way to have an edge and to win in the long run, is to increase the accuracy of your predictions.

Lets say our imaginary method predicts 0 accurately better than odds.

0 hit 10 times in the last 500 spins.

This means that you have to place bet when some of those 0 hit that in the eventual count your bets hit better than odds.

Point is even if you have an accurate method to predict 0, 0 may hit lower than odds during our betting session.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This brings to question about the underlying premise of most systems design, that is, some unique spin sequence happens more often than odds.

Does this exist in roulette spins ?
Repeaters, sleepers, Vaddi pairs, unique voodoo patterns
Do any of these hit above odds ?

At the very least you understand the underlying "assumption" or "hypothesis" that might hv hitrate exceeding odds.

That's why it's very important to figure out the reason why your systems bet may hit at higher rate than odds.

Else you're chasing the rainbow.

And if you do hv it figured out,
Steve says "Go make your millions."

[precogmiles]

Clown? Chassing shadows, what movie is that....
Must be that movie where the clown saw the next roulette number in his dream.
Mister high(chiken) IQ level, i like to play (when RNG/ airball) pattern based systems, and
i have my Solution and it s based  on dealer signature not on  *i see the future* games,
not shadows,  not pregointuguessitions.

You started all this sh*t  when named( in other thread ) all system players junkies and
low IQ people.   From that my attitude toward you ....i don  t really care if you win or lose with your stuff.
Happy winnings but not virtual ones.

Why do you have a losing chart as your avatar?