If we want to find a HG, maybe we should think as we were the Casino bank

[winforus]

Thank you sweet for showing us the thinking process for majority of system junkies. Very poor education, ignorance, close mindedness, and stubbornness  - are some of the factors which contribute to casinos taking millions from them every year.

This is why when you tell them - "the only way to win is to increase the accuracy of your predictions" - to them it's like a foreign language.

[cht]

TBF to Steve and the math Boyz they are right.

If you don't find a way to know A happening more than B, or
A happening more than odds

It's a sure loser.

Repeaters, sleepers together with the rest I wrote on the other thread are sure losers.

[huskerdu]

the only way to win is to increase the accuracy of your predictions

If you think you can do it, you'd  have already done it. But you cannot. Nobody can.
In my opinion, physics,. visual balistics and similar staff is another gambler's fallacy.

[gizmotron2]

I have three graphics all generated from 200 bets on Red in a row for each graphic. It, on its own, is a pathetic method of bet selection. It produces what I wanted to show you anyway. It shows ups and downs. You don't need to increase a capacity to predict the future in order to take advantage of it. In one case all you need to do is switch sides and bet on black. Other graphs show that upward streaks have very limited duration. It's a matter of learning how to ride the waves. You can tell the difference between strong direction and moderate or lackluster direction. That is information. You can even tell when a characteristic ends and the graph takes on a different character, like comparing all three graphs as 600 spins all bet flat on red.

[Kattila]

Hi Gizmotron,
What we see here ? I see  the M  and W  patterns, always there in any chart, no doubt.
Not always help in play, but many times can save from long(or short)  Ls  streaks.
Start to bet when tend to win , stop or reduce bets when tend to go down.
See the file ( inside two charts, one your). After open zoom if necesary.

[Steve]

Casino win and rakes in most gambler's br, because of "extreme variance".

It has nothing to do with variance. Variance doesnt make you lose.

What makes you lose is the difference between payout and odds, ie the house edge.

If you want to minimize variance, just bet more numbers. But again variance isn't your problem.

[gizmotron2]

Hi Gizmotron,
What we see here ? I see  the M  and W  patterns, always there in any chart, no doubt.
Not always help in play, but many times can save from long(or short)  Ls  streaks.
Start to bet when tend to win , stop or reduce bets when tend to go down.
See the file ( inside two charts, one your). After open zoom if necesary.

Brilliant. Just like  a stock trader with a plan.

[winforus]

GIZMOTRON2 - What do you mean when you say "riding the waves"? I suppose that you are using intuition/feeling, to help you make a decision weather you should be "riding" or not. I personally had moments in the past, when all reds or blacks were constantly coming out - and I had a feeling that it would continue with that trend for a good period of the time. The feeling was there and it turned out to be true - but this is a combination of intuition/precognition. Do I understand you correctly or do you mean something else when you say this?

[gizmotron2]

KATTILA

GIZMOTRON2 - What do you mean when you say "riding the waves"? I suppose that you are using intuition/feeling, to help you make a decision weather you should be "riding" or not. I personally had moments in the past, when all reds or blacks were constantly coming out - and I had a feeling that it would continue with that trend for a good period of the time. The feeling was there and it turned out to be true - but this is a combination of intuition/precognition. Do I understand you correctly or do you mean something else when you say this?

I mean if you can relate to what KATTILA showed in the charts drawn with start and stop points then you will get an idea. It's not feeling and it's not pure mechanical. It's mechanical with conditional checking added to it. I'll dig up the background from stock trading to show you how all this got started. It might have been from this very forum that the idea got into my head more than two years ago when this video was posted. The guy misses one thing that I know matters. He thinks that casinos win because of math. But the truth is casinos win much more than the math allows for by the odds alone.

Here is that video. It will help to understand the start and stop points in the graphs:
link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=bRCtBRsLPmk

[Kattila]

In the same way,
Example L W play, trying to catch the Ws  and avoid Ls.

[cht]

If you think you can do it, you'd  have already done it. But you cannot. Nobody can.
In my opinion, physics,. visual balistics and similar staff is another gambler's fallacy.

The problem with VB and RC is that they ought to rely on physics principles  and equations. Whereas we all know VB on forum is primitively crude and RC on sale does not run physics differential equations algo. These are facts meaning zero physics content except convenient usage of the word.

And we also know never discuss physics with a salesman

[Steve]

So your answer is you have no experience, at all?

I'm a player before selling anything. any serious player can get my best computers free and split winnings 

Even a salesman would have more experience than your no experience. I'm not sure you'd even understand the most basic algorithm.

Btw, the physics published covers about half of what happens, and some of it is incorrect.

[Steve]

Also in those documents they used video processing for timings. I did this about 10 years ago for ball and green detection.

This video was made about 10 years ago

That was part of the earliest version of my automated computers. 10 years ago. You're clueless.

[Steve]

If you think you can do it, you'd  have already done it.

I have. And I'm not the only one. The proof isnt hard to find.

In my opinion, physics,. visual balistics and similar staff is another gambler's fallacy.

Again, you'd just need to do a bit of research. Really, it's not rocket science.

[jay]

Thank you sweet for showing us the thinking process for majority of system junkies. Very poor education, ignorance, close mindedness, and stubbornness  - are some of the factors which contribute to casinos taking millions from them every year.

This is why when you tell them - "the only way to win is to increase the accuracy of your predictions" - to them it's like a foreign language.

Ok, you talk about the HE but imagine I play 100 spins of R/B and I was only betting on Black and black came out 70 times and I won, where is the HE now?
It is the variance isn’t, that kills a system?
What I increased the accuracy of my bet by choosing black?
Ok, zero came out 3 times, I still won 67 hands and lost 33.
Variance killed the cat