10 years on. What are the conclusion? What wins?

[precogmiles]

So after 10 years of posts on this forum. What is the general consensus of what works.

Which of the following works best?

1. Repeaters

2. Random vs random

3. Martingale and other progressions

4. Sectors

5. Physics

6. Precognition

[Steve]

1. Repeaters

Obviously.

[Steeefan2014]

Obviously.

Are you being sarcastic or you really believe that?

[Steve]

Actually i changed my mind. Using random bets to beat random totally makes sense too. Hard to decide.

My logic is when I played pin the tail on the donkey, i got spun around a bit, and accuracy was random. But when I got spun around even more, I hit the tail, spot on. Makes perfect sense.  Just like math beats a math game.

[Elite]

Not  understand...this  logic,,,  explain in simple words,,,  please

[winforus]

i agree with Steve, it's hard to decide weather repeaters or random vs random is the best one, they are both very solid.

As long as we use proper bankroll management, and  ride the wave - we will only lose because of variance. Ignatus also proved it with his latest system - he achieved an 85% win rate.

[RayManZ]

Steve is trolling...

[huskerdu]

After 13 years of playing roulette, I have come to those conclusions;
1. The only thing that WE KNOW FOR SURE that will happen is that we will have at average  about 12 repeaters in an 38 cyrcle (of course i have seen 15 but also i have seen . If we can take advantage of this with a clever MM we can have a positive outcome. 
2. We cannot know when a trend will appear.
3. We cannot bredict sectors, as we cannot predict colors, dozens, columns, and anything else.
4. Physics and pregognition is a myth. Whatever positive outcome may have come out some times, is due to luck and randomness of the session.
5. Random vs random is the only way not to have a big series of loses and not to fall into gambler's fallacy. 
So after all:
Bet selection: repeaters or random vs random with a soft progresion.

[Joe]

Just like math beats a math game.

And don't forget - random has limits! 

[charly]

5. Random vs random is the only way not to have a big series of loses and not to fall into gambler's fallacy. 

I have tested a lot random vs random. Coin flip versus RED,BLACK.....a Large random system of 500 coins versus RED, BLACK and so on...
and the truth is 

random vs random is not better or worse than other betting systems. In long term, the results of betting random or betting with some system, are the same. And random vs random as all other systems can give a big series of loses too.
In my opinion there is only one advantage by using random - no need to waste time trying to create a system with logic rules as in long term results will be the same.

[charly]

So after 10 years of posts on this forum. What is the general consensus of what works.

Which of the following works best?

1. Repeaters

2. Random vs random

3. Martingale and other progressions

4. Sectors

5. Physics

6. Precognition

Smart progression systems is an only way how to beat house. No way to earn with fixed stake amount.

[Richard Meisel]

My personal choice is Betting on the Even/Odd. I took Martin Silverthorne's Super Neural Strategy and I tweaked his Stops and his Targets and his Bet Selection and his Progression and am Winning 80% of the games, Winning 4 games to every Loss. The losing streak happens more with Red/Black and High/Low because of certain inconsistencies on the Wheel.

[Taotie]

Which of the following works best?

1. Repeaters

2. Random vs random

3. Martingale and other progressions

4. Sectors

5. Physics

6. Precognition

7. Luck


Luck works best. It can also kill methods 1 through 6 if you ignore it.

[travis]

1. Repeaters

NI SE DISCUTE,

NEITHER DISCUSSED

[Taotie]

Which of the following works best?

1. Repeaters

2. Random vs random

3. Martingale and other progressions

4. Sectors

5. Physics

6. Precognition

7. Luck

I suppose 7. Luck, could be mistaken for 2. Random v random. No doubt Luck could very easily incorporate 1. Repeaters, and if used accurately would benefit from a bit of 3. Martingale and other progressions. Inadvertently and on occasion 4. Sectors would be unavoidable, same goes for 5. Physics.

And 6. Precognition. Well that's just a fancy word for luck anyway. It's the way some folk try to attune their luck. There are other ways to be lucky.

So luck is the winner!