I have achieved a consistent system!

[publa]

these are my results!

OK, results may be yours, but why the screenshot it says "System: IGNATUS KING 14"?
In addition, to tell the trend in 130 or so spins is not sufficient.


It looks like you are using derived work at best - not nice.

[Roulettebeater]

OK, results may be yours, but why the screenshot it says "System: IGNATUS KING 14"?
In addition, to tell the trend in 130 or so spins is not sufficient.


It looks like you are using derived work at best - not nice.

Awful !

is he manipulating Also the results ?
Well, it seems so !
Scammers sometimes make fatal mistakes 

[Clf7]

OK, results may be yours, but why the screenshot it says "System: IGNATUS KING 14"?
In addition, to tell the trend in 130 or so spins is not sufficient.


It looks like you are using derived work at best - not nice.

Haha yes you are right

[Héctor]

the results are my way of playing.
When I downloaded the rx that system came out, but it is not activated.

[Cristal2000]

Can you post the permanence  you played?

I asked you to permanence

[Bigbroben]

Sergio-Passion-Astrid-Hector: you are pathetic.

The way you write betrays you.  The presentation you use betrays you.

Let go roulette and try something new in life while you are still young.

[Roulettebeater]

Let go roulette and try something new in life while you are still young.

Blackjack?

[Bigbroben]

Blackjack?

Lettebea, you know what I meant: something other than gambling. 
Developing a Wonka-style nonmelting ice cream or learning esperanto.  Or hitch-hiking to Kazakhstan.
Anything constructive long term.

[vladir]

WTF is this ? 130 spins ?

I am no computer scientist and I made tests myself on several systems with hundreds of thousands of spins, in excel and RX.

For me, anything less then 10 sessions with 10K spins/session is nothing. Even 10K is very few, several systems can pass that mark with profit.

If you are a computer scientist, but you don't understand why we need a big sample size or if you can't do this kind of test in RX or excel or any programming language, I advise you to return to school. You probably missed some important classes.

[Steve]

Funny you'd use those numbers, because those are the numbers I used in my next video.

It's almost ready. I had fun with this one. 

And you're absolutely right. But you still get players saying crap like "I'll never play 100k spins so I don't need to test that many." These same people might say in the next sentence that they think the key to beating roulette is repeaters, or some crap like that.

[gianfrancopierino]

if i had the holly grail i will sell it only for a large ammount, but no one will pay you a large ammount.
my strategy is, I play to win,  I train friends and get percentage.

[stranger90]

I train friends and get percentage.

If you'd need to train friends for a percentage then it's not a holy grail.
A holy grail would work with compounding growth and you would be a billionaire in no time.
If a holy grail was possible and you found it, you would do your best to keep it secret.
The gambling industry would be aware of it the very next day and they would do anything to keep it from spreading: change the game, rig it against you, remove the game if loss is too big or even eliminate you.

[gianfrancopierino]

friend 1 in training for 40%, 2 are allready in line. I will keep it secret with people i trust.

[stranger90]

So you have the holy grail but start new threads asking help with strategies for a hobby...mkay.
You are so far you don't yet realize how far you are )))

[gianfrancopierino]

I don't have the holy grail, never wrote it.The actual system is very strong, that does not stop me to continue the search for the ultimate system.No shit reverse psychology will work with me so stop trying.