My holy grail...

[Austria]

I play NO SYSTEM longer than 72 spins.
This fulfills the two-thirds law for a small profit.

[Mister Eko]

I sell my premium HG too. 19 euro.

[Steeefan2014]

Btw will you finally post in your thread a long term test with 500K spins of your systems?

Who the f*ck is gonna play a system for 500k  or 1-2mil spins??? This rule is a nonsense!

And why do you care about my system?? Watch your trolling job. That's one thing you're good at!
May I ask which is your support on this forum? Except trolling and blaming others?

[Steeefan2014]

 

I sell my premium HG too. 19 euro.

I'll give you 20 if it passes 5mil spins (clf7 rule)

[Mister Eko]

I'll give you 20 if it passes 5mil spins (clf7 rule)

Ok but cant be coded I use my brain

[Steeefan2014]

Ok but cant be coded I use my brain

Even better! Do you accept 25EUR?? 

[Mister Eko]

Who the f*ck is gonna play a system for 500k  or 1-2mil spins??? This rule is a nonsense!

And why do you care about my system?? Watch your trolling job. That's one thing you're good at!
May I ask which is your support on this forum? Except trolling and blaming others?

Look, clf7 is very negative befause he disappointed in lot of systems which he tried, and he doesnt trust in systems anymore, except if it show profit after some 500k or million spins. It is for his the proof, thats all.

[Mister Eko]

Even better! Do you accept 25EUR?? 

Very good, but plasse take it seriously

[Steeefan2014]

Look, clf7 is very negative befause he disappointed in lot of systems which he tried, and he doesnt trust in systems anymore, except if it show profit after some 500k or million spins. It is for his the proof, thats all.

I can understand that! But - as steve said - he doesn't have to act like a c*nt! That's all!

Fair-play? Does this sounds familliar?

[Mister Eko]

I can understand that! But - as steve said - he doesn't have to act like a c*nt! That's all!

Fair-play? Does this sounds familliar?

Fair-play in what?

[Clf7]

I am simply done with scammers in this forum.Steve must set some rules here, based on them will every member  have the right to post about any so called winning system.For example: 1.Proof that it passed thousands of spins on RX (500K at least) , 2.On what it is based on  etc etc.Only facts! This bla bla bla and talking without facts every time must stop!

[swanson]

I am simply done with scammers in this forum.

That's probably about 99.9% of this forum buddy.

Clf is going the safe route. It's safer and smarter to test over many spins than be lucky by short-term results. BTW, all are fools who think that a reason is more important than testing over tons of spins, because everyone's so called reason or reasons are mostly delusions, except for genuine ones, like having the ability to use telekinesis to move the roulette ball. I believe all progression is utterly stupid (it is like trying to beat math with math), but I could be wrong. If a system uses progression, then obviously you need tons and tons and tons of more testing.

To determine how many spins you must test, you have to calculate the probability of being ahead (and by how much) depending on how many numbers you are betting on and if you are using progression to see if you have a winning system. Or you can use some other math based on standard deviations. People can easily pass tens of thousands of spins by just flat-betting and getting lucky. I was wrong in an earlier post where I said that 5,000 spins flat-betting would be a valid test. This is not nearly enough. Maybe it is if you are significantly ahead in profit. Again, you would have to look at the standard deviation.

[Steeefan2014]

That's probably about 99.9% of this forum buddy.

Clf is going the safe route. It's safer and smarter to test over many spins than be lucky by short-term results. BTW, all are fools who think that a reason is more important than testing over tons of spins, because everyone's so called reason or reasons are mostly delusions, except for genuine ones, like having the ability to use telekinesis to move the roulette ball. I believe all progression is utterly stupid (it is like trying to beat math with math), but I could be wrong. If a system uses progression, then obviously you need tons and tons and tons of more testing.

To determine how many spins you must test, you have to calculate the probability of being ahead (and by how much) depending on how many numbers you are betting on and if you are using progression to see if you have a winning system. Or you can use some other math based on standard deviations. People can easily pass tens of thousands of spins by just flat-betting and getting lucky. I was wrong in an earlier post where I said that 5,000 spins flat-betting would be a valid test. This is not nearly enough. Maybe it is if you are significantly ahead in profit. Again, you would have to look at the standard deviation.

As I previously said, I can understand that Clf is going on the safe route. I have no problem with that. But between that and acting like he is, considering the fact that a lot of the guys here shared something (doesn't matter if good or bad) it's a difference. You can't act like that, being so arrogant when you showed... almost nothing! But you have requirements! Based on what??? What did you bring on the table???

[winforus]

CLF7, some people here are complete morons, just accept this fact.

500k spins is not even enough, 2M + would be far more reasonable. Steve will tell you the same thing.

What is the difference between an ignorant person and a complete moron? Morons are stubborn and will continue to argue and defend their idiotic positions.

[Steeefan2014]

I am simply done with scammers in this forum.Steve must set some rules here, based on them will every member  have the right to post about any so called winning system.For example: 1.Proof that it passed thousands of spins on RX (500K at least) , 2.On what it is based on  etc etc.Only facts! This bla bla bla and talking without facts every time must stop!

I think you bla, bla more than half of the members here!