Why don't we just all help each other to create a killer strategy and make money

[gizmotron2]

Yes.  Or no.

No, 500 spins is BS. Anyway. I don't give a rat's ass if you learn Reading Randomness or not.  It's out there to run a head trip on the mathgZombies. Nobody would give away a working HG. Ha ha, I did. You are scratching your head and trying to trip me up. But I don't care. You should try to get someone else to validate the universe and to influence those that control it for you. I'm just sitting back and enjoying the view.

[winforus]

I already did that. I won every session until I just blind guessed into oblivion. I was board with it and I began to suspect that the sim lets you win. So I took up real. I have been gambling online at a sight that I suspect throws extra losing streaks into the mix on each session. It doesn't wreck me because I sit out losing streaks. But that is not scientifically validated. I heard there are sights that offer spin result confirmation. So I'm looking for one that actually pays you if you win. Steve has a suggested one. I just need to learn about processing hash algorithms. I've done it before in my own software for validation purposes. But I need to use the same hash function that the casino uses.  This fake stuff surprises me because there sure are a lot of really good gamblers on the winners list. With all that Roulette should be shut down by now.

MPR is legit as far as I know - Steve created it and he can prove it to you, so this doesn’t make any sense.  A person who claimed precogniton worked also demonstrated it on there without any problems - he didn’t blame the software.

Winning some sessions and then losing due to guessing, is not winning. The same can be done with random bets. If “reading randomness” works, you should be able to demonstrate yourself winning over a decent sample size on there.

[gizmotron2]

Winning some sessions and then losing due to guessing, is not winning. The same can be done with random bets. If “reading randomness” works, you should be able to demonstrate yourself winning over a decent sample size on there.

I have a plan for validation. I show people what the skill is, demonstrate the skill, answer questions about the skill, and just wait until the casinos see it.  More and more people will develop the skill. It's a very simple plan.  I did not say losing because of guessing. I said blind guessing. That means without concern for what will happen. It went right into free fall, just as I suspected that it would. There are far more winners on Steve's MPR than there are in real casinos.  I just see it as amazing if looking for a better way to describe it. That alone makes me wonder why so much arguing goes on around here.  All those people are winners but they still argue about what works and what does not work. I can build a game like that that cheats to make you win.  I would think it's a kind of amusing flypaper.  It's practice and it starts out with a very good bankroll.  I started winning my 3 net wins and done stuff. It's just too easy. After 50 or 60 sessions you start to suspect something. And one guy got to a trillion in only 2 to 4 hundred spins. How did that work?

[INTERCEPTOR]

Hey guys

We're all here to find a strategy to make some money... so dont we just all come together and make a strategy that we can all make money with?

Everyone please share what strategy they are using now.

Thanks
Scott

No way to give for free.

[winforus]

I have a plan for validation. I show people what the skill is, demonstrate the skill, answer questions about the skill, and just wait until the casinos see it.  More and more people will develop the skill. It's a very simple plan.  I did not say losing because of guessing. I said blind guessing. That means without concern for what will happen.

This still doesn't explain why you couldn't demonstrate yourself winning over a decent sample size. All you need to do, is play for a good number of spins and "read randomness", and then show this.

There are far more winners on Steve's MPR than there are in real casinos. 

This is not true, here is a screenshot of current leaderboard: link:s://prnt.sc/sqodj7

If you look at players who have played 200+ spins, majority have a win rate of below 1.0. And those that are above 1.0, are just slightly breaking even. The players with very low number of spins are not to be taken in account, as anyone can create many accounts - hit on them and leave that win rate.

And one guy got to a trillion in only 2 to 4 hundred spins. How did that work?

The trillion doesn't matter -anyone can do it with some luck and by using very aggressive progression. The bankroll on there does not matter, what matters is the win rate. The win rate determines how accurate their bets care.

if reading randomness really works - you can demonstrate it on MPR or on link:s://roulette-simulator.info/  over a decent sample size. If you will start blaming the software (which as I explained there is no reason to), it will only discredit your case.

[Nimo]

Check out Nisa's strategy on Roulette Simulator.  Simple, effective and profitable on RNG, Live, Air and Auto.

[winforus]

And gizmontron, the same thing happens in real casinos. Most of players lose in the long run - but those that win short term, are convinced that their systems work and continue to play, until it hits them. This even happened to Steve in his first years of playing Roulette - until he eventually lost (before he realized the fundamental mistakes that system players make, as he was also a system player).

The same applies to all games of chance - not just to Roulette.

[Clf7]

Check out Nisa's strategy on Roulette Simulator.  Simple, effective and profitable on RNG, Live, Air and Auto.

On wich simulator? RX? could you post a link of the strategy? Thanks

[Nimo]

On wich simulator? RX? could you post a link of the strategy? Thanks

link:s://roulette-simulator.info/en/user/2ccc2826b445aebac6f6b3f8013e7931


She (my daughter) is placing a bet on a line (double street) and incrementally increasing the bet to match spins until in profit.  Spin 1, bet i Unit, spin 2 bet 2 units etc.  On a win, if she is in profit she stops, if not she continues the count until in profit.

[Clf7]

link:s://roulette-simulator.info/en/user/2ccc2826b445aebac6f6b3f8013e7931


She (my daughter) is placing a bet on a line (double street) and incrementally increasing the bet to match spins until in profit.  Spin 1, bet i Unit, spin 2 bet 2 units etc.  On a win, if she is in profit she stops, if not she continues the count until in profit.

Basically a simply martinagle nothing new buddy.

[gizmotron2]

if reading randomness really works - you can demonstrate it on MPR or on link:s://roulette-simulator.info/  over a decent sample size. If you will start blaming the software (which as I explained there is no reason to), it will only discredit your case.

Just signed up at roulette-simulator. I'll try this once again. I just need to get used to placing bets there and filling in my charts. I hope this does not have a timer on bets placed.

[winforus]

Just signed up at roulette-simulator. I'll try this once again. I just need to get used to placing bets there and filling in my charts. I hope this does not have a timer on bets placed.

Very good, yes there is no timer on roulette-simulator. Make sure to pick a "rated game", that way it can be saved, and later the rest of us would be able to see.

[gizmotron2]

Very good, yes there is no timer on roulette-simulator. Make sure to pick a "rated game", that way it can be saved, and later the rest of us would be able to see.

OK, so I got it running. I took two pictures. I won my 54. I'm playing RR basic strategy 3 net wins at real bets of 18 per bet on an EC, be it inside or outside. and -126 for any lost session. My virtual bets will be 1 unit on any outside EC bet.

[gizmotron2]

It acts just like an RNG at an online casino. This is going to be massively boring.

[Moxy]

MPR is legit as far as I know - Steve created it and he can prove it to you, so this doesn’t make any sense.  A person who claimed precogniton worked also demonstrated it on there without any problems - he didn’t blame the software.

Winning some sessions and then losing due to guessing, is not winning. The same can be done with random bets. If “reading randomness” works, you should be able to demonstrate yourself winning over a decent sample size on there.

He may be paranoid or hiding some deficiency.  One or the other.