Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[winforus]

You fell for it hook line an sinker.  Thank you.  You got treated exactly to what you hoped you would see. I shouldn't complain really. I created a Spandex boy. Let's see if you can figure out why I would have done that. Duhhh!

You are my trained Pit Yorkie. Sit, stay, stop licking your butt.

I am not the one who creates imaginary students, then loses on RS, and then claim that I lost on purpose to save the embarrassment. I am not the one who's past students call you scammer, and say that your method is BS.

Facts are still there, which you can't hide from. At this point, I am enjoying your train crash and the truth finally coming out!

[gizmotron2]

Anyone can win 50 "sessions" in a row, if in a session, you play play 3 spins on average. It is meaningless

Thank you for confirming that you never checked my bets.  It must be a kind of special gift to know what you know.

"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble; it's what you know for sure that just ain't so."

[winforus]

This is actually funny. Do you really think that after spending 15 years on randomness, coincidence, and win streaks that I secretly actually use the Martingale? 

I've got a bridge to sell you over prime swamp land in Florida.

Did I say that you were using martingale? I have not seen a single session where when you lost, you didn't increase the bet size.

It is very sad, that after 15 years, you can't win on RS and need to lie about your imaginary students.

[winforus]

Gizmo, you have losing record on RS, with over 10 resets and a losing record on MPR. You got former students calling you a scammer and former students saying that RR doesn't work. You got caught lying many times.

There is 0 proof that whatever you do works.

You have dug your own grave.

[gizmotron2]

I am not the one who creates imaginary students, then loses on RS, and then claim that I lost on purpose to save the embarrassment. I am not the one who's past students call you scammer, and say that your method is BS.

No you are not. You are the one that creates imaginary students. I didn't lose on save myself from embarrassment. I lost on purpose because people like you already know what you know and don't need to read what really happened. You people said play at the practice site where all my telemetry could not lie. And then all I got for all that work was crickets. Denzie is not the consensus of the almost 40 students over the past 8 years. Where is the throng of students that claim that I scammed them?  One guy that failed at TurboGenius does not make a quorum. Why are you so ticked off? It wasn't even you. You already know everything. What a creation. Thank you for cooperating and flipping out. Save the world.

[gizmotron2]

Gizmo, you have losing record on RS, with over 10 resets and a losing record on MPR. You got former students calling you a scammer and former students saying that RR doesn't work. You got caught lying many times.

That's just proof that you can be manipulated. You are in fact daring me to go ahead and prove it.  Why should I bother if someone like you already knows the answers?  Did it ever occur to you that I wanted to openly share my bet selections?  When it all fell on deaf ears I decided to play chumps like you. Now you are the savior of the gambling world, my creation. Thank you for proving it.

[gizmotron2]

This is best of all. You actually believe that I use the Martingale.

[winforus]

I didn't lose on save myself from embarrassment. I lost on purpose because people like you already know what you know and don't need to read what really happened.

So you lost on purpose more than 9 times on RS (you got 10 resets) and also on MPR? Do you expect anyone to believe this?

Denzie is not the consensus of the almost 40 students over the past 8 years. Where is the throng of students that claim that I scammed them?  One guy that failed at TurboGenius does not make a quorum.

You claimed that you turned ALL of your students into winning players. Yet, yesterday Kairo came out and said that he lost. Denzie also paid for your coaching and lost. So that was a LIE and so far we have 2 former people claiming that they lost.

Where are the other 38 people? And why not a single one has came in to vouch for you? Answer: They are imaginary.

[gizmotron2]

Did I say that you were using martingale? I have not seen a single session where when you lost, you didn't increase the bet size.

It is very sad, that after 15 years, you can't win on RS and need to lie about your imaginary students.

Once again you have proved that you already know everything without having to read it.  Do you know what "Up & Pull" is, who suggested it, and what (2, 1, 2) means?  You just didn't look into it.

[gizmotron2]

You claimed that you turned ALL of your students into winning players.

No I did not fiction boy.  I never talked about any of my students from the past other than the last one that worked extensively one on one and reached 4.66 to 1 that equates to 2 to 1.  None of the people at the teaching thread are my students. These are people trying it on their own and getting an occasional answer.  You look very bad at this point.

[gizmotron2]

o you lost on purpose more than 9 times on RS (you got 10 resets) and also on MPR? Do you expect anyone to believe this?

It worked on you. I figured that I needed to do that to get a rise out of people like you. It worked perfectly. Go ahead, grab all the facts that you need to arrive at your conclusions. I played at RS just to share my real bets. That went nowhere real fast. So I started to play a better game. I started playing pull the idiots chain. There is nothing stopping you from finding out if it works for you. I'm hoping that you are so smart that you don't need to.

[gizmotron2]

Where are the other 38 people? And why not a single one has came in to vouch for you? Answer: They are imaginary.

I don't think you will listen but I'll tell you anyway. All of them were trained to go after the double dozens, 24 to 26 numbers at a time for each funded bet.  I found out that it did not work well with the suggestions made by the Adam Khoo. Everything changed after that. All the previous students were all taught to wait for the huge win streak and to attack it vigorously. They were taught to let themselves descend deep into their bankrolls while waiting for it. That is what I showed Denzie. I had practice software for them with double dozens sets.  There is only one student of the new EC stuff and in combination with Adam Khoo's suggestions. All this new stuff has taken up the last three years.

[Kairomancer]

I never talked about any of my students from the past other than the last one that worked extensively one on one and reached 4.66 to 1 that equates to 2 to 1.  None of the people at the teaching thread are my students. These are people trying it on their own and getting an occasional answer.

That is correct.

I did exstensive test of over 200 sessions with every possible variations playing flat bet and concluded that it is not safe to play this with 21 units of total bankroll as suggested.
Bad streaks of first losses do happen and it can last for months.

I think this method still has merit enhanced with precognition to gauge the working conditions for a promising pattern or possible coincidences.
I think playing ECs with la partage rules is superior to single number guessing with precognition. The reasons are the lower house edge and easier to avoid suspicion/detection.

[Kairomancer]

To be clear I have not tested RR with precog, so it is just mere speculation.

[gizmotron2]

I did exstensive test of over 200 sessions with every possible variations playing flat bet

I have failed at flat bet. I tried to explain what I do now after you left. I use a fragmented part of John Patrick's up & pull. I start with 2 times my base big bet value and if I win I use half that on the next try. If that wins I'm done with my three net wins and out.

If I lose that bet at 2 times the base value then I stay at 2 times until I recover around half way. I then go between 1 time and 2 times the value. This is why I do that. It is stupid to not press when you are in a win streak, specially a good win streak. I tried to flat bet only at RS and got killed because I was  trying to recover a slow grind downward with single valued flat bets. It's stupid to play for six or seven wins from a win streak to try and get ahead. I play micro streaks and only take one net win off of them at a time. There are more first try net wins than there are two in a row wins. I'm sorry you tried this with just flat betting.  I can't do it either. But I killed it at RS with all of those tests of 50 sessions using (2, 1) or (1, 2, 2, 2, 2,)  John Patrick Up & Pull. I really expected to get trashed for appearing to double my bets on that. But nobody wanted any explanation of the Up & Pull and attacking strong win streaks.

In fact the word "attacking" is a trigger word for Spandex boys.