Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[gizmotron2]

Bad streaks of first losses do happen and it can last for months.

That is very interesting.  My one on one student lost three sessions in a row, 21 net losses once. I have lost three sessions in a row only once. I encouraged people to try this in hopes of finding out these answers about who can do what. I got more from your try than anyone. You really did try 200 sessions. You posted them all so that you could read the results and the bets placed. One other guy did really well and has now gone on to other ways to gamble. He has no way to try it out in a casino, too far to go. But I don't know why he moved on. Not talking about it and I won't bother people that are not saying on their own. But I was and still am glad that you did the best job of putting all the examples of your sessions in plain view.

[gizmotron2]

I think this method still has merit enhanced with precognition to gauge the working conditions for a promising pattern or possible coincidences.

I would not ask you to go back and try a restricted attack against excellent win streaks at the ( 2, ) value.  You do have win streak recognition skills.  You are going along at flat betting but you add the double value when it really is looking good. It's that simple. You back off to the ( 1, ) value after you have stayed long enough at the higher value and automatically take a one net win for doing it. Anyway thanks for giving it a try. It might work with Precognition. But I have always had premonitions that equate to a single number. It just starts working when I first get there and then fades after a few spins.  Sometimes it happens in the middle of a session but only lasts for one time and then goes away.  I can't depend on it. But I guess someone could have precognition for sets  and groups like Black & Red.

[winforus]

No I did not fiction boy.  I never talked about any of my students from the past other than the last one that worked extensively one on one and reached 4.66 to 1 that equates to 2 to 1.  None of the people at the teaching thread are my students. These are people trying it on their own and getting an occasional answer.  You look very bad at this point.

Yes you did say that, here is the quote:

Everyone there has succeeded except you. You showed your telemetry of your progress. I watched you break the basic strategy. I wanted you to feel free to work it out or not on your own. I stayed silent when you gave up. I have my own opinion on how you failed. But I'm not going there. You came to it with your precognition interests more concerning to you. You went back to your primary interests. Your progress is there to see. You can't take it down.

If I get validated then they will be able to see if they can tell why you failed at something that works. Nobody else there has failed. All their work on it confirms that it works. I did the arithmetic. Almost all of them reached 4.66 won sessions at 3 net wins to each lost session at 7 net losses. That equates to a 2 to 1 win to loss ratio.

At this point, you have lied so much, that you don't even remember?

[winforus]

I have failed at flat bet.

I tried to flat bet only at RS and got killed because I was  trying to recover a slow grind downward with single valued flat bets. It's stupid to play for six or seven wins from a win streak to try and get ahead. I play micro streaks and only take one net win off of them at a time. There are more first try net wins than there are two in a row wins. I'm sorry you tried this with just flat betting.  I can't do it either. But I killed it at RS with all of those tests of 50 sessions using (2, 1) or (1, 2, 2, 2, 2,)  John Patrick Up & Pull. I really expected to get trashed for appearing to double my bets on that. But nobody wanted any explanation of the Up & Pull and attacking strong win streaks.

In fact the word "attacking" is a trigger word for Spandex boys.

Thank you for admitting that you have a losing method. If you can't win by flat betting, it means that it's a losing method, no matter which method it is.If you can only win with progression, it means that it can only win short term, as you don't have an edge, and playing with a big interest rate. This explains why you lost on RS.

Steve and any player who has their basic fundamentals down, will agree.

[gizmotron2]

Thank you for admitting that you have a losing method.

And I have a loser on a chain too.

[winforus]

And I have a loser on a chain too.

Your tactics - Deny, deflect, lie, and when backed into a corner, ignore or write some nonsense.

GG, you admitted that "Reading Randomness" is not a winning long term method.

[gizmotron2]

GG, you admitted that "Reading Randomness" is not a winning long term method.

I know. That was the direct fuck with your head approach. Glad it worked.

[winforus]

I know. That was the direct fuck with your head approach. Glad it worked.

What you said, was not even directed at me. Should have left this thread at the right time - now you got totally exposed.

[gizmotron2]

What you said, was not even directed at me. Should have left this thread at the right time - now you got totally exposed.

It's actually interesting how you are like a Chatty Cathy Doll. You pull the string and you begin harping like your Spandex is dragging on the ground. You really are beginning to sound like a nagging old lady.

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=f-sYQ8_2v_Q

[winforus]

Gizmo, the facts remain the same:

1) You lost on both RS and MPR - on RS you lost over 9 times. You claimed it was done on purpose, and later said because you were bored.

2) You lied and made up imaginary students. You claimed you turned ALL students into winning players, when in fact all the people that have we heard from, said that your method doesn't work and that you are a scammer.

3) You admitted that got "killed" while flat betting and that you failed with winning at flat bet. Essentially, this means that your method/system is a losing one.

You talk the talk, but you don't walk the walk. You make up lies on the go, and then pretend like you didn't say them. Sorry, but there is no escaping this. What you said, cannot be undone.

[gizmotron2]

I know what it is about you. It's like I have my very own toy Adam Schiff with is bag of Russians to get Trump.

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=a8oVefM21qw

Can you prove it in a court of law?

[Moxy]

Gizmo, the facts remain the same:

1) You lost on both RS and MPR - on RS you lost over 9 times. You claimed it was done on purpose, and later said because you were bored.

2) You lied and made up imaginary students. You claimed you turned ALL students into winning players, when in fact all the people that have we heard from, said that your method doesn't work and that you are a scammer.

3) You admitted that got "killed" while flat betting and that you failed with winning at flat bet. Essentially, this means that your method/system is a losing one.

You talk the talk, but you don't walk the walk. You make up lies on the go, and then pretend like you didn't say them. Sorry, but there is no escaping this. What you said, cannot be undone.

Let's do lunch.  Where are you in the States?

[gizmotron2]

So you want it on like Donkey Kong?

Let's see if you are smart enough. This requires a third grade education or better and the ability to add and subtract.

1.) Can you see the strong side in each grouping in this chart pictured below by looking down each column one at a time?

2.) Can you tell from the spin numbers on the right for each spin how many connected spins each strong side had?

3.) Can you do the same 1 and 2 questions above for the weak side?

[precogmiles]

So you want it on like Donkey Kong?

Let's see if you are smart enough. This requires a third grade education or better and the ability to add and subtract.

1.) Can you see the strong side in each grouping in this chart pictured below by looking down each column one at a time?

2.) Can you tell from the spin numbers on the right for each spin how many connected spins each strong side had?

3.) Can you do the same 1 and 2 questions above for the weak side?

I thought you were going to shut up?

[gizmotron2]

I thought you were going to shut up?

I was but I got to thinking that it can't be true that first try attempts can go on a losing streak for 3 months at a time.

So here is a question for you.  Would you like to see me wreck Baccarat, Craps, Roulette, and Blackjack just by taking people here on a very simplified one on one instruction of Reading Randomness? If I do it I mean these games would all be done. It would spread like wild fire. Could you stand watching this happen like a virus? It just means that I could not use it anymore.  I guess you could try ESP on slots.