Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[gizmotron2]

Just getting started. I just thought I would let you weasel farts have a go at me from the beginning. It's so fun to watch you all flip out and save the world of probability.  Like it needs saving, really?

[winforus]

I'm not trying to get first place. I'm just validating 4.66 to 1 which will equate to 2 to 1 win to loss ratio in a game that can't be beaten or even tied at 1 to 1.

You have already tried to get 1st place and failed miserably. It is documented in this thread, where I have already posted the graphs.

I just wonder what the excuses for dismissing this will be.

What will the excuses for failure be this time? That you were bored? That you lost on purpose? That you were too lazy? You have a history of always creating excuses for losing.

After say two months and three sessions per day go by I will have a consistent track record

You have been talking a lot of BS, with a lot of empty promises. All talk, and no action.

That will be the equivalence of the first student that proved it to me before I ever shared RR.

There is not a single documentation of any people that you taught, that turned out to be winning players. There is also not a single student of yours that came in to vouch for you in this thread.

So what will it take to validate that at least I did it? I'm flat betting at 350 to 450 depending on the number of bet locations I try with an average of 20 units per number selected. 18 numbers = 360. I often cover the zero for 10 units and add an extra 10 units on any outside bets if they apply.  This is almost dead on flat betting.  I'm not supposed to be able to do that, right? Like nobody is. 

You would need to keep the same unit bet size for inside bets, and the same for outside bets. If you will change them, that means you are using progression (even if only for a few spins).

Just think. You know for sure that I'm going to fail. You can't wait. But you sure want to make sure what you think will happen is documented. So it is.

You have reset your RS account 13 times, it is well documented and losing graphs can be found throughout this thread.

[gizmotron2]

You have already tried to get 1st place and failed miserably. It is documented in this thread, where I have already posted the graphs.

I moved on because you made me see the light. You are so effective.

[gizmotron2]

What will the excuses for failure be this time?

Eat the shit sandwich. I won't fail. You had better be right or you are going to look real stupid. Imagine you being outfoxed by me.

So how many cycles will it take to validate 4.66 to 1, or a 2 to 1 win to loss ratio?

[gizmotron2]

There is not a single documentation of any people that you taught,

I have all the emails and all the session results. Just because I did not publish them does not mean that they are not in existence. I'm not dumb enough to drop off my laptop and forget where I dropped it off. Vote for the Biden Crime Family if you really want to be fucked.

[winforus]

Eat the shit sandwich. I won't fail. You had better be right or you are going to look real stupid. Imagine you being outfoxed by me.

So how many cycles will it take to validate 4.66 to 1, or a 2 to 1 win to loss ratio?

You have 13 resets on your RS account. So you will need to show a LOT more evidence for winning than usual, given your 13 resets and history of losing.

Nobody is asking you to validate "2 to 1 win to loss ratio". People want to see you win by only flat betting.

When you lose though, don't create another excuse.

[gizmotron2]

You would need to keep the same unit bet size for inside bets, and the same for outside bets. If you will change them, that means you are using progression (even if only for a few spins).

I am. It's not a perfect range. Some of my sets have 19 numbers instead of 18, (outside bets). Sometimes I also cover the single zero. Some times, very few I target the sleeping dozen of the swarm of singles in double dozens. But each chip value is 20 unless I'm also backing a bet with a few at 10 as insurance bets.

Your only hope is to convince everyone that this is not flat betting. But you wont see 700 to 900 used. That would be doubling the base rate between 350 and 450. I'm not doubling down. I'm not self destructing.

[gizmotron2]

Nobody is asking you to validate "2 to 1 win to loss ratio". People want to see you win by only flat betting.

Yes, somebody did. They insisted that nobody ever reached 4.66 to 1 in session stop win /stop losses points. You would not believe it if it was not done at RS. So I'm doing it.

[gizmotron2]

When you lose though, don't create another excuse.

When I succeed you do the same.

[Mean]

Gizmotron, enough it enough. Stop deluding people with the same old typical gambler's fallacies. You can't beat roulette with math.

[Mean]

Like it needs saving, really?

You need saving, you old fart

[Mean]

I moved on because you made me see the light.

I moved on because you get brewing darkness. You should do the same.

[Mean]

You had better be right or you are going to look real stupid.

Gizmotron, stop trying to win the lottery to look good for one day on a stupid gambling forum nobody even cares about.

[Mean]

I have all the emails and all the session results.

Stop making things up; it doesn't make you look smart.

[Mean]

Vote for the Biden Crime Family if you really want to be fucked.

So says the master scammer