Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[winforus]

I get to decide what things mean to me when I read them, control freak bitch. I have been taking damaged conceptions and inferences off the mathBoyz and the mathNazi's for decades. I'm not projecting anything here.  It's you with your subjective compulsion to pigeonhole the process of communication over a need for semantics. It ain't semantics. It's specific. It's in your head as some kind of rhetorical manifestation. It's not that important to communicate if all you want to do is lecture me on how your words are sufficient, especially since in your mind I misunderstood them. Screw you and your position on increasing an ability to predict things.  Did that pass the semantics test? I know what I'm doing. You have clearly made it known that you don't think I know what I'm doing. Thanks a heap Sigmund F.

I now understand why Moxy is trolling you - good work Moxy.

Somehow you twisted my words, became very offended, and now once again your defensive/impulsive attitude came out. 

You are claiming you are not projecting - but you clearly are. And that's a huge red flag for me. In fact, it is beyond hilarious.

[gizmotron2]

I now understand why Moxy is trolling you - good work Moxy.

Somehow you twisted my words, became very offended, and now once again your defensive/impulsive attitude came out. 

You are claiming you are not projecting - but you clearly are. And that's a huge red flag for me. In fact, it is beyond hilarious.

Good, you are insulted. Course this could just be semantics. Why not drop the pretense and posturing and actually make your point. Stop with the BS of how you are misunderstood and communicate what exactly you think I got wrong. You do the work, the heavy lifting, of being understood.

[Moxy]

I get to decide what things mean to me when I read them, control freak bitch. I have been taking damaged conceptions and inferences off the mathBoyz and the mathNazi's for decades. I'm not projecting anything here.  It's you with your subjective compulsion to pigeonhole the process of communication over a need for semantics. It ain't semantics. It's specific. It's in your head as some kind of rhetorical manifestation. It's not that important to communicate if all you want to do is lecture me on how your words are sufficient, especially since in your mind I misunderstood them. Screw you and your position on increasing an ability to predict things.  Did that pass the semantics test? I know what I'm doing. You have clearly made it known that you don't think I know what I'm doing. Thanks a heap Sigmund F.

Come on, bruh.  What are you really doing here?

[gizmotron2]

Come on, bruh.  What are you really doing here?

taking a sh*t wherever you are, fly.

[Moxy]

taking a sh*t wherever you are, fly.

Sadomasochist?  Or something else?

[winforus]

Good, you are insulted. Course this could just be semantics. Why not drop the pretense and posturing and actually make your point. Stop with the BS of how you are misunderstood and communicate what exactly you think I got wrong. You do the work, the heavy lifting, of being understood.

You need to cultivate next-generation eyeballs and enhance end-to-end swarms

[Moxy]

You need to cultivate next-generation eyeballs and enhance end-to-end swarms

G-Mo gets insulted when conventional language is used to try to grasp his abstract speak.

[gizmotron2]

Sadomasochist?  Or something else?

Are you really that stupid?

[gizmotron2]

G-Mo gets insulted when conventional language is used to try to grasp his abstract speak.

Recruiting for the big breakfast?

[winforus]

G-Mo gets insulted when conventional language is used to try to grasp his abstract speak.

Yup, I now understood the brilliance of your posts

[gizmotron2]

Yup, I now understood the brilliance of your posts

great minds think alike.

[Moxy]

great minds think alike.

I have to speak in code for smart folks like you to grasp. 

I digress; smart folks like you tend to get a tad over-zealous with their "verbage" and it's a tad cringe-y.

[Moxy]

Are you really that stupid?

Maybe trying to fulfill a certain c-plex?

[gizmotron2]

I have to speak in code for smart folks like you to grasp. 

I digress; smart folks like you tend to get a tad over-zealous with their "verbage" and it's a tad cringe-y. [sic] it's "cringey."

You have never left the main subject. You are a troll. Your contribution on this forum is mostly a buzzing pest. You are still a buzzing pest.

[gizmotron2]

Maybe trying to fulfill a certain c-plex?

Oh, are you really?