Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[Kairomancer]

No way. You can't win every session playing flat bet RR, if you play every day long enough.
I have already proved that.
Though doubling your baset bet after 2 lost days seems to work well short term.

[gizmotron2]

No way. You can't win every session playing flat bet RR, if you play every day long enough.
I have already proved that.
Though doubling your baset bet after 2 lost days seems to work well short term.

I think I can do it. I'm sticking to 10 unit chips, @ 180 to 200 bets, as the flat bet against 18 to 20 numbers and 1 as the virtual bet on any of the EC outside bets if I use them. We will see. I'm sure I will obliterate the expectation of statistical math. I'm going to go much slower, fewer sessions per day. This will eliminate fatigue and laziness. I already have 3 sessions at 540 or thereabouts.

[precogmiles]

Just rest and start again. So we can see what a flat bet reading randomness game is.

[gizmotron2]

No way. You can't win every session playing flat bet RR, if you play every day long enough.
I have already proved that.
Though doubling your baset bet after 2 lost days seems to work well short term.

You are right. I can't win without the attacking bet.  I had three easy sessions and then just an outright war that had tons of doubling down bets that I did not make. I guess I have to stick to my style. Interesting though.  Each session has its own features.  Other sessions don't matter. You fight the one you are in. I just want to beat the math.

[winforus]

Just rest and start again. So we can see what a flat bet reading randomness game is.

He said at first that he was going to flat bet it and then when I asked him, why he didn't stick to it, he said "I set the rules and do what I want", was very angry at me with his response.

Now that after using progression, variance evened out, he crashed and is actually down.

Here is the graph so far:

link:s://prnt.sc/t56okl

He can say that he got bored, lazy, etc, but those are excuses that any player can make imo. Let the graph and stats speak for themselves.

If he can't beat it with flat betting, then he will never win in the long run with progression. Eventually the debt will have to be repaid.

[precogmiles]

He said at first that he was going to flat bet it and then when I asked him, why he didn't stick to it, he said "I set the rules and do what I want", was very angry at me with his response.

Now that after using progression, variance evened out, he crashed and is actually down.

Here is the graph so far:

link:s://prnt.sc/t56okl

He can say that he got bored, lazy, etc, but those are excuses that any player can make imo. Let the graph and stats speak for themselves.

If he can't beat it with flat betting, then he will never win in the long run with progression. Eventually the debt will have to be repaid.

I agree completely. He said the same thing about MPR too. He always gets bored and losses. Why can't he get bored and win?   and using progression does not help.

Making excuses does not help your cause gizmo. It's great of you can demonstrate a working idea, just don't claim random excuses when you lose.

[gizmotron2]

He can say that he got bored, lazy, etc, but those are excuses that any player can make imo. Let the graph and stats speak for themselves.

I don't use a progression. I move up at a higher bet level when I attack. That's how I really play.  The mini streaks come in mini size. I take one win off of them. I just tend to use higher bets when I recover. But only on the mini win streaks. This past week I went of a progression festival just to mask my first 50 wins. I want people to see fault with it and to pass it up. You have to be smart enough to know why I would do that.  I also went on a mad dash for the top and reached 14th place before blowing that up.  I'm glad you are out there trashing it. I show how to do it, demonstrate it working and then mask it in failure. It brings out the skeptics. It hides the lessons. The best part is all you see are progressions. Mission Accomplished.

[gizmotron2]

I agree completely. He said the same thing about MPR too. He always gets bored and losses. Why can't he get bored and win?   and using progression does not help.

Making excuses does not help your cause gizmo. It's great of you can demonstrate a working idea, just don't claim random excuses when you lose.

Where the heck were you when I won the first 50 in a row? I got bored winning. It all shows my doubling down at times to recover. Was 50 in a row luck?  Hey, I hope you pass it up. You need to find that hot repeater and chase Turbo's banana on a stick. OOPs, you aren't one of the Turbo freaks. Sorry. I can mask my work if I want to. Masking works best if it is not believed.

[winforus]

I agree completely. He said the same thing about MPR too. He always gets bored and losses. Why can't he get bored and win?   and using progression does not help.

Making excuses does not help your cause gizmo. It's great of you can demonstrate a working idea, just don't claim random excuses when you lose.

Good point, forgot about the MPR.

And don't forget, that he claims to have already been using this method to win for 10+ years, without a losing session (if my memory is correct).

If that would be true, he should have no problem with "boredom or laziness", to demonstrate it on MPR or RR.

[winforus]

I don't use a progression.

Yes you do, do you not understand what progression means? You are not sticking to the same bet, you increase your bet size.

I move up at a higher bet level when I attack.

That's called using progression.

I just tend to use higher bets when I recover.

That's called using progression.

This past week I went of a progression festival just to mask my first 50 wins

So you admit to using progression.You are contradicting yourself in every sentence. You claim to not use progression and then say that you use progressions.

I show how to do it, demonstrate it working and then mask it in failure. It hides the lessons.Mission Accomplished.

So now you claim that you lost on purpose? Before you claimed that you got bored because you were bored and lazy. At this point, you have lost all the credibility that you had and had buried yourself completely.

[gizmotron2]

Good point, forgot about the MPR.

And don't forget, that he claims to have already been using this method to win for 10+ years, without a losing session (if my memory is correct).

If that would be true, he should have no problem with "boredom or laziness", to demonstrate it on MPR or RR.

Just look at the first 50. I did the same thing at MPR. I didn't start winning until I stopped going after the double dozens and added the 7 / 3 method to the sessions. I no longer chase the monster sized win streaks that I clearly talked about for years. I also carry three bankrolls of 7 net losses. I have never lost three 7 net losses in a row. I average 5 wins at 3 net wins to each lost session at 7 net losses. That's more than 2 to 1 or 66% to 33% in net valued bets. But deliberate attempting to win all those 50 sessions with a 3,000 bankroll against 54 for each session win was not supposed to be possible. Yet you guys were as quite as a mouse fart. Now you are all fired up after I fired you up.

[gizmotron2]

Yes you do, do you not understand what progression means? You are not sticking to the same bet, you increase your bet size.

I don't care, I don't give a shit. Explain the first 50 at 54 ( 3 X's 18 ).

[gizmotron2]

So now you claim that you lost on purpose? Before you claimed that you got bored because you were bored and lazy.

At this point, you have lost all the credibility that you had and had buried yourself completely.

Have you looked at how people have taken 1's place. It's all wild ass't play.

[winforus]

Have you looked at how people have taken 1's place. It's all wild ass't play.

How is it relevant how other players have reached the #1 there? Your "Reading Randomness" is supposed to be different and better than all those players making random bets.

Your goal in the beginning was not to reach #1, but to show yourself winning consistently with this method.

I don't give a shit about your first 50. When you were winning big with progression, you didn't say that you were winning due to boredom, did you? You claimed that you were crushing it due to "Reading Randomness". Now that the variance evened out, it is very convenient for you to claim that you got "bored" or "lazy".

You are full of shit and excuses. There is beyond too many contradictions and excuses, at this point you totally buried yourself.

[winforus]

And had the luck continued to go your way, and instead of losing the 100k, you would of ended up winning 100k more, you would have continued to claim it was due to "reading randomness", "attacking at the right time", and long paragraphs swimming in your glory.

I can now see why multiple people told me that you use con man tactics.