Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[winforus]

Everyone there has succeeded except you

Nobody else there has failed. All their work on it confirms that it works. I did the arithmetic. Almost all of them reached 4.66 won sessions at 3 net wins to each lost session at 7 net losses.

So it turns out Gizmotron lied again? Here he is saying that everyone succeeded except precogmiles, but now we have another former student of his coming out and saying that he (Kairomancer) and Denzie also failed.

Gizmotron - all of your students so far have came out and said that your method has failed. Something doesn't add up here.

[winforus]

You did not pay for this version of RR based on Even Chance play. You paid for Double Dozens. Back then I taught going for the super win streak and descending deep into the bankroll. Someone suggested watching a video on trading stocks like a casino. Everything changed after that. Denzie and I worked at length on attempting to crack TurboGenius' hot number theories too. Did you learn visual dexterity?  I think that it's very important that you failed. I need lots of proof that it does not work.

So back then whatever you were teaching was a losing method? And your "new version" is a winning one?

Enough with excuses and bs, as of now, we got a proof that 4 people (including yourself), have lost with RR.

How about you show us ONE of many of your successful students that you turned into a winning player.

Why has not a single person came in here to vouch for you?

[winforus]

After doing a little digging, here is what Denzie had to say about Gizmotron:
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=20411.msg209101#msg209101

At least Dynzie isnt a loser for 20 years and still bankrupt,  scamming others with some fancy mumbo jumbo. SCAMMER !!!!!! 

Tell the world you're a broke scammer. But hey......lil Gizmo......prove me wrong on MPR ..... shut me up and show what you got. Action speak louder than words...... 

No , they have not. He's a scammer who's good with words but cant win this game.

Of course he can prove me wrong by beating the game provided here. No words but Actions 

[precogmiles]

I believe Gizmo mistakenly thinks that I am precogmiles based on his replies.

Thanks for clarifying, kairo.

No wonder he is full of shit. I have never been his student.

Gizmo get some help! Take a break from this online world and roulette. Go make your music and enjoy your life. Stop wasting your time on Reading randomness it is a failed idea.

[gizmotron2]

OK, so it was you. I know it was someone trying precognition. Did you shit can that too?

[gizmotron2]

I've been reading some comments on what I should do. Basically it's prove it or shut up.

That's sounds like good advice. So I'll shut up here. I will probably only answer questions over there if asked.

After 15 years of fighting with people I can see that it has gotten nowhere.

I just can't decide how to prove it. I started gambling online because of this Covid-19 stuff. At first I thought they were using targeting algorithms perhaps. But what I discovered is that the RNG output goes through ups and downs just like a fair randomness. Since I fooled around with Roulette Simulator and its basic 3,000 unit start point I discovered that I like 30 times my base value bet instead of 7 net losses and out.  So I've shifted that to real online gambling.  My goal is to never lose a full 30 units, by basically sticking with a session until I win it.

I don't know how to prove it with that though. But  we will have a vaccine soon enough and I will take that being prime in the target for getting killed by the virus. I plan on going Pro, according to IRS requirements here in the States. I suppose my gambling taxes might serve as proof. That would get rejected somehow by Photoshop I suspect. I have a nephew that graduated from MIT with undergraduate and graduate degrees. I could arrange a meeting with some of the professors there through him. That would be a shocker for you guys.

But one of you suggested that perhaps only I can do this alone and so nobody else can do it. So I'm back to not having any valuable proof.  It's too boring for me to prove it at RS. At least online gambling has real consequences.

Anyway, what I'm doing here is clearly non productive.

Let me give you one last laugh. You really should find out if my Global Effect and the Elegant Pattern are actually the greatest gambling opportunities there ever is in gambling. I know I never convinced a single person on those two things. So laugh it up.  And if you are out on your bike at night, don't forget to wear white Spandex.

I think I need to go for that million dollar brass ring just to get attention.

So I will leave you all with a song. It's been real.

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=52EeVLOeM0w

[Moxy]

I've been reading some comments on what I should do. Basically it's prove it or shut up.

That's sounds like good advice. So I'll shut up here. I will probably only answer questions over there if asked.

After 15 years of fighting with people I can see that it has gotten nowhere.

I just can't decide how to prove it. I started gambling online because of this Covid-19 stuff. At first I thought they were using targeting algorithms perhaps. But what I discovered is that the RNG output goes through ups and downs just like a fair randomness. Since I fooled around with Roulette Simulator and its basic 3,000 unit start point I discovered that I like 30 times my base value bet instead of 7 net losses and out.  So I've shifted that to real online gambling.  My goal is to never lose a full 30 units, by basically sticking with a session until I win it.

I don't know how to prove it with that though. But  we will have a vaccine soon enough and I will take that being prime in the target for getting killed by the virus. I plan on going Pro, according to IRS requirements here in the States. I suppose my gambling taxes might serve as proof. That would get rejected somehow by Photoshop I suspect. I have a nephew that graduated from MIT with undergraduate and graduate degrees. I could arrange a meeting with some of the professors there through him. That would be a shocker for you guys.

But one of you suggested that perhaps only I can do this alone and so nobody else can do it. So I'm back to not having any valuable proof.  It's too boring for me to prove it at RS. At least online gambling has real consequences.

Anyway, what I'm doing here is clearly non productive.

Let me give you one last laugh. You really should find out if my Global Effect and the Elegant Pattern are actually the greatest gambling opportunities there ever is in gambling. I know I never convinced a single person on those two things. So laugh it up.  And if you are out on your bike at night, don't forget to wear white Spandex.

I think I need to go for that million dollar brass ring just to get attention.

So I will leave you all with a song. It's been real.

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=52EeVLOeM0w

You've asked for it.  It's on like DK.  Time and place?

[winforus]

It's too boring for me to prove it at RS. At least online gambling has real consequences.

So you lost on purpose or because you were bored on RS? Which one is it going to be?

Precogmiles proved it on MPR and on RS - was it too boring for him?

Steve provides proof for his Roulette Computers as well - is it too boring for him?

Like I have been saying, you are a conman - that's why the only proof we have is of you and your students losing.

[Elite]

Random exists in pattern,,,  first  step  to identify it,  2nd to manage  bet  in that  pattern,,,  this I hope  gizm  want to convey,, if no pattern in random,,   then martingale  will  kill  roulette  everyday,,  one  column bet  where  a column  hit  in every 6 spins,,  will  make  casino  out  of business,,, so yes  pattern exists,,,  I agree  with gizm

[gizmotron2]

So you lost on purpose or because you were bored on RS? Which one is it going to be?

Precogmiles proved it on MPR and on RS - was it too boring for him?

Steve provides proof for his Roulette Computers as well - is it too boring for him?

Like I have been saying, you are a conman - that's why the only proof we have is of you and your students losing.

You are the conman for pretending to tell yourself what is going on and then sharing your assumptions as facts.

I played these free simulations three times, won 50 sessions in a row using three net wins and out, then blindly let big bets kill me off by just pressing repeat bet and spin. You people had my 50 wins in a row before you for several weeks and said nothing. I came to the conclusion that 50 wins in a row was not going to be enough for any of you. Nobody checked my bet technique for bet selections. In other words I can only assume that nobody wanted proof or to see these50 wins in a row.  I tried to share three different times. All I got was crickets. If I had to use your intellect to get by I'd file for disability.

You have nothing but crap to suggest how things work.  Starting from false assumptions and  making things up makes you the one that is questionable. Just look at what you guys said after I did 50 sessions.  You don't know what I have written about getting tired and getting lazy and you won't allow me to be who I really am. Instead you have gone on a witch hunt and you think you have accomplished something.   I like you like this. Retribution is built into yourself by design. You are a self destructing bomb.

How can it be a con job if I gave it all away for free and provided a way to prove it to yourself without having to go to a casino first?  Add this to the stack. Every person that has asked me for private one on one lessens was directed to the free training thread and then asked if they wanted to pay for the one on one training or go through the free version on their own.  Every one of them has gone for the free version.  You have trouble with what you think this is. You then flap your beak too much. Your credibility is suspect.

[gizmotron2]

Random exists in pattern,,,  first  step  to identify it,  2nd to manage  bet  in that  pattern,,,  this I hope  gizm  want to convey,, if no pattern in random,,   then martingale  will  kill  roulette  everyday,,  one  column bet  where  a column  hit  in every 6 spins,,  will  make  casino  out  of business,,, so yes  pattern exists,,,  I agree  with gizm

Thank you. The gambler controls when they bet, where they bet, and how much they bet.  It's a wonderful condition.

[gizmotron2]

You've asked for it.  It's on like DK.  Time and place?

What does that mean?

[winforus]

You are the conman for pretending to tell yourself what is going on and then sharing your assumptions as facts.

I played these free simulations three times, won 50 sessions in a row using three net wins and out, then blindly let big bets kill me off by just pressing repeat bet and spin. You people had my 50 wins in a row before you for several weeks and said nothing. I came to the conclusion that 50 wins in a row was not going to be enough for any of you. Nobody checked my bet technique for bet selections. In other words I can only assume that nobody wanted proof or to see these50 wins in a row.  I tried to share three different times. All I got was crickets. If I had to use your intellect to get by I'd file for disability.

You have nothing but crap to suggest how things work.  Starting from false assumptions and  making things up makes you the one that is questionable. Just look at what you guys said after I did 50 sessions.  You don't know what I have written about getting tired and getting lazy and you won't allow me to be who I really am. Instead you have gone on a witch hunt and you think you have accomplished something.   I like you like this. Retribution is built into yourself by design. You are a self destructing bomb.

How can it be a con job if I gave it all away for free and provided a way to prove it to yourself without having to go to a casino first?  Add this to the stack. Every person that has asked me for private one on one lessens was directed to the free training thread and then asked if they wanted to pay for the one on one training or go through the free version on their own.  Every one of them has gone for the free version.  You have trouble with what you think this is. You then flap your beak too much. Your credibility is suspect.

You are a conman because every time you say something, a LIE comes out of your mouth.

1)Anyone can win 50 "sessions" in a row, if in a session, you play play 3 spins on average. It is meaningless - Steve has also said that. I can play a session for 3 spins, get a win, and restart another "session". At this rate, you can get even 1000 sessions, as it is very short term. What matters is not short term, but long term.

2)You claimed that you were flat betting, and that turned out to be a lie. You were using progression and recovery to win in short term.

Here are the screenshots from your last session on RS:
link:s://prnt.sc/umeq0x
link:s://prnt.sc/uml3nf

As you can see, you have been doubling your bets upon losses.

3) You claimed that you will prove it to everyone by winning on RS. You claimed that you got bored, then you claimed you lost on purpose, which turned out to be a lie. You restarted 10 times on RS and you are still losing: link:s://prnt.sc/umerek

4) You claimed to have been teaching this for over 10 years and that you turned ALL of your students into winning players. That's a lie! There have been 3 people that you taught in the past who came in here and claimed that they lost using RR. Another student called you a straight up scammer.

So far, there has been 0 proof, and only lies coming out of your mouth. This is why I called you a conman and not only me.

[gizmotron2]

As you can see, you have been doubling your bets upon losses.

You fell for it hook line an sinker.  Thank you.  You got treated exactly to what you hoped you would see. I shouldn't complain really. I created a Spandex boy. Let's see if you can figure out why I would have done that. Duhhh!

You are my trained Pit Yorkie. Sit, stay, stop licking your butt.

[gizmotron2]

This is actually funny. Do you really think that after spending 15 years on randomness, coincidence, and win streaks that I secretly actually use the Martingale? 

I've got a bridge to sell you over prime swamp land in Florida.