Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[gizmotron2]

Except that's not how you went about it - once you again you are distorting the truth. You made up excuses and lies, as to why you lost on MPR and RS, and the fact that you taught 30+ people, and turned them all into a winning players.

Question: Did you turn 30+ students of yours into winning players before you saw the video or after?

If stating facts and caring about truth is being a "jerk", then I am happy to be one.

You have positioned yourself as a "guru", or somebody who has been successful at this for many years. You did not present yourself as someone who is testing something out, or somebody who is doing experiments. Your arrogant attitude plus so many lies along the way, is the reason why I should continue to call you out on your BS, until more people catch on.

Whenever I present actual arguments and facts that you can't deny, you write some silly response or go on personal attacks like a little child.

I don't care how you complain. You want proof so I'm going to do that the long and hard way. It won't take another 15 years.

[Moxy]

I don't care how you complain. You want proof so I'm going to do that the long and hard way. It won't take another 15 years.

First off, get your story straight, chief.  As I also caught on to some of that fibbing.

[gizmotron2]

First off, get your story straight, chief.  As I also caught on to some of that fibbing.

Don't care how you complain either.

[stranger90]

Didn't work well in the end hmmm? Just seen your deep dive yesterday...11 resets already.
Don't mean to sound critical, keep up the best work brother.

[mma]

Gizmotron, please help. I've read all your pages on gamblingforums, but cannot figure it out. Sometimes I can win with singles on the weak side and doubles on the strong side, but it isn't always working.

[mma]

Didn't work well in the end hmmm? Just seen your deep dive yesterday...11 resets already.
Don't mean to sound critical, keep up the best work brother.

He does this on purpose to toy with mathnazis. He even told you this.

[mma]

First off, get your story straight, chief.  As I also caught on to some of that fibbing.

Why don't you stop trolling and be a man. Act like an adult for once. You may learn something.

[gizmotron2]

Didn't work well in the end hmmm? Just seen your deep dive yesterday...11 resets already.
Don't mean to sound critical, keep up the best work brother.

Here's the deal. I did all this for me. I went through discovering why I was losing at the casinos when I would go on expensive junkets.  I was trying all this with too small a bankroll.  I would bring about 10 units for the bankroll.  Even though I would use virtual bets I was still losing too many sessions. Those numbers for 3/7 and 4.66 won sessions for each lost session are real. I would just get taken out by the low bankroll and be forced to quit.

This lockdown stuff gave me time to try out the 3000 "Rated" games. I had a huge bankroll to work with. I discovered that I could use 100 & 200 as the unit value and have plenty of room to maneuver. It looks like I could go on forever winning just 300 points per session using my ( 2, 1, ) or ( 1, 2, )  style of moving through good and better sequences of each session. This method is what works best for me.

I hate getting bored. In fact I just about self destruct a lot because of it. I just pick a bet and let it ride until it bottoms out. That's what happened. I can't stop myself from just giving up the fight.  I never lose when I'm willing to fight for each win.

It's all meaningless. If I go on a  huge win streak for several months it will all go as meaning nothing. It will not prove a thing. But I got something important out of all this. I know I must bring 4 session bankrolls of 7 units each to the casino. I need that much maneuvering room. I must also quit every session that I break my rules and become complacent in, right as I don't care about winning.  I got that from RS. Gambling has been a quest to actually attempt to make a living from it for me.

The critics and the skeptics don't matter. What they believe is irrelevant. They have never showed me how to win consistently.

I don't have to overcome my weakness to get lazy. But I might try something new here. I'm thinking of quitting each time I get tired or bored, no matter where in the session I am at the time.  It will be my way of experiencing discipline and practicing that.

You can't do anything about the mathZombies and their cancel culture, even here in a gambling discussion forum. But I can ignore them.

[mma]

Here's the deal. I did all this for me. I went through discovering why I was losing at the casinos when I would go on expensive junkets.  I was trying all this with too small a bankroll.  I would bring about 10 units for the bankroll.  Even though I would use virtual bets I was still losing too many sessions. Those numbers for 3/7 and 4.66 won sessions for each lost session are real. I would just get taken out by the low bankroll and be forced to quit.

This lockdown stuff gave me time to try out the 3000 "Rated" games. I had a huge bankroll to work with. I discovered that I could use 100 & 200 as the unit value and have plenty of room to maneuver. It looks like I could go on forever winning just 300 points per session using my ( 2, 1, ) or ( 1, 2, )  style of moving through good and better sequences of each session. This method is what works best for me.

I hate getting bored. In fact I just about self destruct a lot because of it. I just pick a bet and let it ride until it bottoms out. That's what happened. I can't stop myself from just giving up the fight.  I never lose when I'm willing to fight for each win.

It's all meaningless. If I go on a  huge win streak for several months it will all go as meaning nothing. It will not prove a thing. But I got something important out of all this. I know I must bring 4 session bankrolls of 7 units each to the casino. I need that much maneuvering room. I must also quit every session that I break my rules and become complacent in, right as I don't care about winning.  I got that from RS. Gambling has been a quest to actually attempt to make a living from it for me.

The critics and the skeptics don't matter. What they believe is irrelevant. They have never showed me how to win consistently.

I don't have to overcome my weakness to get lazy. But I might try something new here. I'm thinking of quitting each time I get tired or bored, no matter where in the session I am at the time.  It will be my way of experiencing discipline and practicing that.

You can't do anything about the mathZombies and their cancel culture, even here in a gambling discussion forum. But I can ignore them.

Anyone can win with a large enough bankroll and enough time to wait for winning opportunities. I am trying to play with less risk.

The good thing about roulette is it is filled with so many losers that it is easy to blend in with the crowd.

[mma]

I hate getting bored. In fact I just about self destruct a lot because of it. I just pick a bet and let it ride until it bottoms out. That's what happened. I can't stop myself from just giving up the fight.  I never lose when I'm willing to fight for each win

You're completely contradicting yourself. Professionals can't stand gambling. They only jump in to situations where they have a positive ev.

[mma]

I'm thinking of quitting each time I get tired or bored,

Please do that. I can't believe u didn't know that already. I still play when tired or bored, but I can easily put those feelings behind me and continue to wait for my opportunistic opportunity.

It will be my way of experiencing discipline and practicing that.

Being 100% disciplined is the only way to win.

[gizmotron2]

Gizmotron, please help. I've read all your pages on gamblingforums, but cannot figure it out. Sometimes I can win with singles on the weak side and doubles on the strong side, but it isn't always working.

You can never expect a pattern to continue. It will never work for you if you need wishful thinking to come true. So don't make desperate bets. All the mathZombies here are right that trends do not work and that they don't predict the future.

The trick to all this is admitting that the trend or pattern on its own can't predict the future. I've tried to explain that it doesn't have to. The way to beat the casino is to bet bigger when you are in a win streak. If it's just a single small isolated win streak amongst a bunch of failed trends then don't bet on it. But if you wait for it you will see a bunch of small trends or patterns signal a swarm of mini win streaks. This is a definite change. You must become skilled at looking for these changes and these conditions.   None of this is about prediction. It's all about coincidence.  You can see swarms of similar sized formations in your charting. They don't even have to be the same trends or patterns. You are looking for a coincidence in the lengths of sequences.

Once you go looking for similarities in the lengths of trends or patterns as your primary observation then everything will change for you. These formations are rhythmic like music. Randomness just produces them out of common coincidence. You can see when they are not there and you can see when they are there.  I'm always looking for a coincidence in the length of several trends or patterns in search of a bigger pictured coincidence.  The bigger picture tells you what the smaller coincidences might keep doing. But you can watch for that to change also. The casino can't protect themselves from a player looking for these coincidences. You have all the control.  I play Roulette because I'm looking across the entire chart of 6 groups all at once in search of these lengths of sequences information. They are like gold mines waiting to get raided.  Baccarat & Craps are very slow and require much less opportunities to detect lengths of trends or patterns because you are stuck with just one grouping.

It's funny to me to watch the mathZombies ignore these secrets because they are stuck on needing a prediction instead of a coincidence. So they flip out and trash discussion.

[gizmotron2]

You're completely contradicting yourself. Professionals can't stand gambling. They only jump in to situations where they have a positive ev.

See what I just shared about the lengths of trends and patterns.

[winforus]

You're completely contradicting yourself. Professionals can't stand gambling. They only jump in to situations where they have a positive ev.

He has contradicted himself more times than one can count. Not to mention the amount of lies, the biggest one him turning many students of his into winning players.

They only jump in to situations where they have a positive ev.

If you will read through the threads, you can easily see that his bets are -EV. He himself stated that he can't win by flat betting, and that he needs to use progression to win. Any professional or competent Roulette player knows that if the system/method can't win with flat bet, it means that it's a -EV win and eventually it will lose - as you have seen countless of times on RS.

Also, If his bets were +EV, he wouldn't have a trouble with getting killed in casinos due to bankroll.

His method, along with countless of other losing methods have one thing in common - they do not increase the accuracy of predictions (bet selections). And that is the only way to have +EV bets.

[gizmotron2]

Please do that. I can't believe u didn't know that already. I still play when tired or bored, but I can easily put those feelings behind me and continue to wait for my opportunistic opportunity.

You might not know where I'm coming from over the years. It's only been 3 years since I changed everything. I use to play to get the giant win streak. I would allow myself to descend deep into my bankroll before hitting that huge win streak. That was my normal style. I would attack the coincidence and murder the casino for a while. It always happened like that. I could count on one huge win streak in every ten hour session.

That was not working for me. I was only playing the double dozens and mainly looking for the super sleeping dozen or the streak of singles. I became use to losing a session for a very long time before winning it in the end.  That is why I have a weakness for letting myself lose while still expecting to win.  I don't mind sharing this. Before I was a great skier I sucked. Before I was a daring mountain climber I was a chicken. All these things you must start at the bottom and become aware of every pitfall as you learn from it.  Gambling is no different for me. All I have to do to go pro is to beat this laziness thing. Heck, when I was doing my research with my practice software I had endless bankroll. I could just start another practice session. But at RS with the 3,000 points. for me, that was an endless bankroll too.  I don't care if I contradict myself. I'm not trying to prove to anyone that this works. I'm just figuring out how to make it work for me. That must include overcoming my weakness to allow myself to descend deep into the bankroll.

I'll answer questions but I'm done trying to explain this. That work is pretty much done. But RS is in fact a great practice tool. I don't mind embarrassing myself in public. I once cartwheeled out of control on a 45 degree face at Squaw Valley back in the early 70's in front of a thousand spectators. I could hear them yelling their oohs & ahhs as I tumbled endlessly down 500 ft to the top of a 150 ft drop off. ... where I stopped, and lived to fight another day.  This gambling stuff is just a bunch of skills to master.