Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[mma]

He'll say something like he doesn't "predict" numbers but wins by coincidentally having his bets where the ball lands. Stupid stuff like this that makes no sense and is contradictory.

Always changing his story. This is what liars do when they're busted. Have you ever watched "Cops"?

[Moxy]

You don't know that and I have never claimed that. I created a self teaching thread and answered a few questions. People on their own demonstrated at least that much. You don't like it? Too bad. That's your problem.

What a joke you are as a human being. First I taught the characteristics of randomness. That alone was an original idea in the gambling world. Sure people have been using trends for centuries. But where are all the characteristics that I brought up? They are for the most part just light suggestions and without specifics in all the best gambling books. Nobody made a science out of it. Does that alone make me a guru. No. You are projecting ego tripping. I hope you never figure that out.

As far as proof goes you can do that yourself. But you are afraid it might actually work, making you a bozo act if you can do it.  I put this out there for free and provided the practice software and all the information to begin getting better at it. It's a skill. It's not another endless hints here and there festival. It takes you through it step by step starting with the importance of visual dexterity in reading a live play session chart. it then goes on to pattern and trend recognition in these playing charts. It then supports the importance of reading the current state of effectiveness of these observed trend characteristics. It then goes into using three net wins as a stop win and 7 net losses and a stop point.

It then asks a simply trained with the basics person to practice with the software a couple hours per day for a full month before making up your mind.

From that you want me to be a liar and some kind of a scam artist that needs attention.  Try looking in the mirror. You will probably find better answers there.

The hubris.   Er...  I mean humility.

[cht]

Why is anyone wasting time posting in this thread

Winforus goes around systems thread to troll.

Steve, this guy is spoiling your forum with his trolling on systems thread.

He has gone beyond stating the math.
He deliberately provoke system betting members.

This type of behaviour can't be acceptable.

Pls put his post on moderation.
Thank you.

[Ross]

Because giz claims to be able to predict numbers better than random. When you prove him wrong, he just plays with words and ideas to escape and counter our valid arguments.

But Gizmo has been making the same claims for at least ten years.
Do you think anything your say will make any difference?
Hence a waste of time.

[gizmotron2]

But Gizmo has been making the same claims for at least ten years.
Do you think anything your say will make any difference?
Hence a waste of time.

Get your facts straight. I admit that you can see all this as the same thing for the past ten years. Make that 15 years and the global effect and the elegant pattern are still exactly what they have always been. If you don't know what these things are or if you are sure that they don't exist then it is not my fault for trying to explain them. All I can say is that one day you will see these things and find out I was right all along.  That does not make me stupid or a lying story teller.

As far as 10 or 15 years going back goes, I showed everyone that three years ago, somebody showed a video on trading stocks like a casino by Adam Khoo. I decided to go back to EC betting after watching that. That was a change from the same old thing. Are these words too difficult for you to understand? Something changed and I clearly gave Adam Khoo the credit for making that radical adjustment.

Because of that video and the concept of trading stocks on the support and resistance factors found with "moving averages"  I decided to use the same kind of stop sell and start buy rules in my Reading Randomness strategy. Are you capable of comprehending the difference between that and my old style of hunting & waiting for the super win streaks? I hope you can see that this is different too.

Some things are the same and some things for the past year since July are different. Now you have been schooled on how your understanding is errant. I don't like having to do it. But your reality is not really the reality that everyone else sees.

[gizmotron2]

He'll say something like he doesn't "predict" numbers but wins by coincidentally having his bets where the ball lands. Stupid stuff like this that makes no sense and is contradictory.

Always changing his story. This is what liars do when they're busted. Have you ever watched "Cops"?

I'm sure that you are congratulating yourself on how smart you look right now.

Only problem is that I figured out what math applies to the Reading Randomness strategy. It's variable change. If you are going to argue for being so bright why don't you take on that. Let's see you debunk sitting out 50% of the losing streaks and what that does to the odds?  You claim that I'm saying that I know when "wins by coincidentally having his bets where the ball lands."  I'm sure you would rather have that discussion as you use a "straw man" argument to make yourself look better. You don't.

You can't prove that I don't have the skill to see win streaks and losing streaks just by claiming that nobody can see these conditions.  So I will ask you skilled idiots one more time. Why do the pit bosses see win streaks? How can they do that?

Arguing with you is like first having to bottle feed you and change your diapers full of crap each time.  You make up stuff you think is true and then act like you discovered the truth.  This is lame. It reveals a total lack of self respect for what you want from life. The best part is that you will get nothing from Reading Randomness. That was predicted by a well known gambler on another forum too. People could be told a working system and it would go right over their heads. He even predicted that people would attack it. You are just fodder in my over all plan. Now flip out on that why don't you.

[pepper]

Einstein is famously quoted as saying: “The only way to beat roulette is to steal money when the croupier isn't looking.”

Btw, I'm mma. I admit I fibbed a bit about the winning bet. It wound up losing. At least I can man up to my mistakes.

[stranger90]

Why do the pit bosses see win streaks? How can they do that?

A pattern or streak can be seen only after it already happened. That is that.
If you disagree then I have a question for you: why do pit bosses still stay on that job for a salary if they developed a skill that could bring them limitless wealth?

[gizmotron2]

A pattern or streak can be seen only after it already happened. That is that.

Brilliant. If you see the same dozen sleeping for 10 spins in a row and it is part of 30 spins in a row of the same dozen sleeping then you are just seeing things.

Don't bother. This is way too complicated for you.

[stranger90]

Why do pit bosses still stay on that job for a salary if they developed a skill that could bring them limitless wealth?

[stranger90]

Brilliant. If you see the same dozen sleeping for 10 spins in a row and it is part of 30 spins in a row of the same dozen sleeping then you are just seeing things.

Don't bother. This is way too complicated for you.

You don't know it was sleeping for x times untill it did, where is the edge?

[gizmotron2]

You don't know it was sleeping for x times untill it did, where is the edge?

I don't care what you don't learn. This is not for you. You go to where I shared it. You learn what I show you. You practice to see if you have the skills. Then you will know. That is the only proof that matters.

[gizmotron2]

OK, I should have done this from the start. I'm playing strict 3 net win or one 7 net loss at around 360 to 400 per bet that allows for 7 net losses in a rated game with a 3000 unit starting point. This is pure Reading Randomness. I'm not trying to win every session or 50 wins in a row. I will lose a few times. I'm just trying to prove that I can average 4.66 net wins at 3 & out to each seven net lost session of around 2600 to 2800 units.

I'm now at 6 wins to 1 loss.  So this is just getting started. It's very close to flat betting. I take long shot bets when I see an occasional combo bet. There are no progressions. You can see every bet. Some times I bet on 24 numbers so the risk is higher but hitting has better odds. It all balances out. It just takes two wins to equal one lost bet.

This should work out as the proof that some people want to see. I'm using 20 unit chips on the straight up numbers. 18 of those comes to 360. So that is where I'm trying to stick all the bets.

We'll have to wait to see if I flip out and go lazy, as usual. But this is a good start.

[precogmiles]

OK, I should have done this from the start. I'm playing strict 3 net win or one 7 net loss at around 360 to 400 per bet that allows for 7 net losses in a rated game with a 3000 unit starting point. This is pure Reading Randomness. I'm not trying to win every session or 50 wins in a row. I will lose a few times. I'm just trying to prove that I can average 4.66 net wins at 3 & out to each seven net lost session of around 2600 to 2800 units.

I'm now at 6 wins to 1 loss.  So this is just getting started. It's very close to flat betting. I take long shot bets when I see an occasional combo bet. There are no progressions. You can see every bet. Some times I bet on 24 numbers so the risk is higher but hitting has better odds. It all balances out. It just takes two wins to equal one lost bet.

This should work out as the proof that some people want to see. I'm using 20 unit chips on the straight up numbers. 18 of those comes to 360. So that is where I'm trying to stick all the bets.

We'll have to wait to see if I flip out and go lazy, as usual. But this is a good start.

When you lose you always seem to blame something. First excuse was you were bored, next excuse was you were trying to hide your method, then it was you were lazy.

If you so convinced that reading randomness works and that the only time you fail is when you fail on purpose, then how is anyone supposed to judge if it works or not?

It is a complete contradiction.

[precogmiles]

Gizmo I have a challenge for you. This will prove if reading randomness has a genuine edge.

Get to 1st position on the rankings and don't make excuses if you lose.

The same challenge also goes out to a certain Mr Clown who is obsessed with repeaters and horses, who has a million accounts RSim.

It is that simple.

Instead of bitching and crying about my results on Rsim, prove you can do better.