Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[precogmiles]

If I was destined to take advice from you I would give up. Just exactly what is your job here? You make as much sense as a pretend super hero.

All I have to do is demonstrate 4.66 to 1 that equates to 2 to 1 in long run flat betting. That's bets from 360 to 420 depending on how many numbers I cover at a time.  That picture of you descending into the Mariana's Trench was exciting.

I am 1st place on Roulette simulator. That means I am better than you. I win and you lose.

Don't cry like a baby when you lose on Roulette simulator again. Be a man and come back here to admit reading randomness does not work.

[precogmiles]

Just keep telling yourself that. You are a pretend person depending on putting me down. I give you meaning. You are a sucker because you think what you see is clear and that you are important. It's all a joke.

Putting you down? Pot calling kettle black?

You were the one talking shit about me on another forum and now want to cry about my response. Both you and Mr Clown have wasted years on repeaters and reading randomness. Losers.

End of discussion. Now go losr on Roulette simulator. Again.

[Mean]

You will.

I have open ears if you want to actually say something useful. Singles on the weak side is an example of something no one can take advantage of. If you could, you would be a billionaire by now.

4.66 to 1 that equates to 2 to 1 in long run flat betting

How did you come up with this 4.66 figure? Are you implying that you make more with progression? Did you have a lucky streak that gave you a 4.66 to 1 ratio?

[gizmotron2]

How did you come up with this 4.66 figure? Are you implying that you make more with progression? Did you have a lucky streak that gave you a 4.66 to 1 ratio?

This just confirms that you didn't bother to read the thread.  I guess you are just imbued with sparkle and elegance. Just wait a few months as I impugn your best effort at sophistry. Don't forget to watch what is right in front of your face. It will explain itself.

[gizmotron2]

You were the one talking shit about me on another forum and now want to cry about my response. Both you and Mr Clown have wasted years on repeaters and reading randomness. Losers.

It was Turbo talking shit about you. I just agreed with his conclusions. Certainly you saw all this coming in the entrails of an owl.

You have been challenged. How about a real test of your ESP skills with "Rated" games only. It's the same requirement suggested that I try to do long ago by others. OH, make sure it's flat betting. It won't count unless it is something close to the same amount, their rules.

[gizmotron2]

I am 1st place on Roulette simulator. That means I am better than you. I win and you lose.

HAHAHA! Boy are you hooked. So the general consensus here is that you are without question the future of gambling. All you have to do is get a magic wand and a gazillion dollar bankroll. LOL

[gizmotron2]

You are desperate. You are so uncertain that reading randomness works that you want to prove it to yourself. 15 years of failed attempts, no wonder you are so unsure about it.

No. Some other asshole here wanted proof that 4.66 to 1 on sessions run with 3 / 7 exists.  RS is best for that purpose. Even you consider RS as proof. It's just my opinion though that "Rated" games are part of that proof. So what are you afraid of? You don't want to be shown that you are wrong do you?  "Just wait" for me to blow up or millions of spins bet to prove it won't be good enough anyway.

So wait then.  Do you really need to ride me to get your thrills in life? Getting to 1st place with 30,000 bets and wild losses proves what? My bets are from 360 to 450 depending on how many numbers I select and they all start at 3,000 bankroll in order to determine the outcome. If you are number 1 it is only because you are all over the place with your session's bankrolls. It's the same as a progression, just like Turbo says.

[winforus]

I will remind everyone that Gizmotron already tried to get 1st place on RS, which he failed at miserably. He now has 13 resets on RS.

Take a look at those graphs and excuses that he had at the time:

To add, here are the graphs:

link:s://prnt.sc/t58nqu - current graph
link:s://prnt.sc/t58t46 - 100k losing session

You lost your 100k in 162 spins, not in 1 or 10 spins. Yet you claim it was due to "boredom and laziness". If you lost it in 10 spins, then your claim would be far more credible. You realized that it wasn't credible, so then you changed to saying that you lost on purpose.

link:s://prnt.sc/t58ubv

After your initial 100k loss, you were still up 1.6k. Yet you went from being up 1.6k to being down -14k. These remaining losses came in ~700 spins. What excuse would you have for those losses after the 100k? More boredom or that you have so much time on your hands, to play for 700 spins and lose on purpose?

[winforus]

Precogmiles has 1st place on RS and MPR. Gizmo has a losing record on both, and a history of making excuses for losing.

Gizmo can talk the talk, but not walk the walk.

Thanks to this thread, Reading Randomness was proven to be a losing method. At this point, Gizmo is trying his best not to let the ship totally sink, as he has invested a lot into this nonsense for the last 10 years.

[Mean]

Just wait a few months as I impugn your best effort at sophistry.

You've been saying this for 10 years.

Don't forget to watch what is right in front of your face. It will explain itself

Oh Brother

[Mean]

How about a real test of your ESP skills with "Rated" games only.

What's your excuse for losing every challenge?

OH, make sure it's flat betting.

So he has to flat bet, but you can use stupid progressions.
Math Zombie!🤣

[gizmotron2]

I will remind everyone that Gizmotron already tried to get 1st place on RS, which he failed at miserably.

I'm not trying to get first place. I'm just validating 4.66 to 1 which will equate to 2 to 1 win to loss ratio in a game that can't be beaten or even tied at 1 to 1.

Complain all you want.  I told everyone that I don't let failure stop me. I just wonder what the excuses for dismissing this will be. After say two months and three sessions per day go by I will have a consistent track record, That will be the equivalence of the first student that proved it to me before I ever shared RR.  So what will it take to validate that at least I did it? I'm flat betting at 350 to 450 depending on the number of bet locations I try with an average of 20 units per number selected. 18 numbers = 360. I often cover the zero for 10 units and add an extra 10 units on any outside bets if they apply.  This is almost dead on flat betting.  I'm not supposed to be able to do that, right? Like nobody is. 

Just think. You know for sure that I'm going to fail. You can't wait. But you sure want to make sure what you think will happen is documented. So it is.

So how long will it take to change your minds if I go ahead and do it.  I call 4.66 wins to 1 loss at 4.66 times 3 and 1 times 7 net losses a full cycle. This represents my long term average. How many cycles would it take to impress you math wizards with this flat betting method? Don't give me that millions of spins crap either. I should not be able to have a lucky streak of 100 cycles flat betting. Or should I ?

[Mean]

as he has invested a lot into this nonsense for the last 10 years.

He hasn't invested anything, just empty promises and lies.

[Mean]

Precogmiles has 1st place on RS and MPR

Is this good? I am unconvinced he has an edge.

[gizmotron2]

So he has to flat bet, but you can use stupid progressions.
Math Zombie!

I'm not using a progression. Get the wax out of your ears.