Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[Mean]

I'm not trying to get first place.

Liar. I've read your post saying you were aiming for 1st on RS when you were winning and do good.

[Mean]

I'm not using a progression. Get the wax out of your ears.

Grow up and get a life. Get a real job. Loser

[gizmotron2]

Grow up and get a life. Get a real job. Loser

Shit sandwich. Your going to love it.

[Mean]

Gizmo is trying his best not to let the ship totally sink

The ship has sunk long ago for anyone with half a brain that goes through his posts. I don't know why he is even allowed to pull this BS

[Mean]

Shit sandwich

Makes more $ than RR, a way to flush your money down the toilet

[Mean]

Gizmotron aka math zombie aka spandex boy doesn't even know how to beat roulette after wasting a lifetime on it. Good job "spandex boy". You have made my day.

[gizmotron2]

The ship has sunk long ago for anyone with half a brain that goes through his posts. I don't know why he is even allowed to pull this BS

Because your BS is so much better. It's too funny.  You are afraid I might just validate this at a place where every bet can be seen. You can't possibly be trying to save the world.

[gizmotron2]

Gizmotron aka math zombie aka spandex boy doesn't even know how to beat roulette after wasting lifetime on it. Good job "spandex boy". You have made my day.

Pathetic. You lose this one troll freak.

[Mean]

After say two months and three sessions per day go by I will have a consistent track record,

Another fucking lie.

That will be the equivalence of the first student that proved it to me before I ever shared RR.  So what will it take to validate that at least I did it? I'm flat betting at 350 to 450 depending on the number of bet locations I try with an average of 20 units per number selected. 18 numbers = 360. I often cover the zero for 10 units and add an extra 10 units on any outside bets if they apply.  This is almost dead on flat betting.  I'm not supposed to be able to do that, right? Like nobody is. 

Just think. You know for sure that I'm going to fail. You can't wait. But you sure want to make sure what you think will happen is documented. So it is.

So how long will it take to change your minds if I go ahead and do it.  I call 4.66 wins to 1 loss at 4.66 times 3 and 1 times 7 net losses a full cycle. This represents my long term average. How many cycles would it take to impress you math wizards with this flat betting method? Don't give me that millions of spins crap either. I should not be able to have a lucky streak of 100 cycles flat betting. Or should I ?

Do you get off on posting bullshit?

[winforus]

I'm not trying to get first place. I'm just validating 4.66 to 1 which will equate to 2 to 1 win to loss ratio in a game that can't be beaten or even tied at 1 to 1.

That's another lie. You tried to get 1st place and you failed. Here is your direct quote before you ended up losing:

I've already planned to take it to number 1. I'll be at 50,000 soon enough. That means that I can double my bets and still stay inside my comfort zone and bankroll.  I'm still trying to figure that out. I like to double up on bet attacking. I also like to have 20 bets in reserve in order to descend in a session. So it looks like it's around 600 for bets and 1200 for attacking bets that are doubled up for 25,000 in bankroll. When I get to 50,000 I can double those amounts and still remain viable. Just trying to figure out the right bankroll to bet ratio. I don't stop at 7 net losses. I stop at 21 net losses. I have never lost three 7 net loss sessions in a row. That is where I get my 21.

[Mean]

Because your BS is so much better. It's too funny.

You're right

You are afraid I might just validate this at a place where every bet can be seen

Your only hope is by getting extremely lucky. You don't have a positive expected value.

[Mean]

You can't possibly be trying to save the world.

The world would be better off if you get off gambling forums and do something productive for society. Cheers!

[Mean]

troll freak

You're just talking about yourself. You're the troll that constantly posts bullshit about roulette on the regular.

[winforus]

Gizmotron, you are not flat betting and have been using progression. Why do you continue to lie? You can't say that you don't know what "progression" and "flat bet" means, because this has been explained to you many times.

Not long ago I showed screenshots of your sessions from RS, where we can see that you are using a progression:

2)You claimed that you were flat betting, and that turned out to be a lie. You were using progression and recovery to win in short term.

Here are the screenshots from your last session on RS:
link:s://prnt.sc/umeq0x
link:s://prnt.sc/uml3nf

As you can see, you have been doubling your bets upon losses.

[gizmotron2]

As you can see, you have been doubling your bets upon losses.

How clever of you. That was two months ago.  Your problem is now.  You will never see proof even if it demonstrated for you.  That is exactly my plan too. Thanks for playing butt boy in the student show. You are perfect.