Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[gizmotron2]

If the system wins by flat betting, it means that it has an edge. If the system cannot win by flat betting, it means that it has no edge. This is how we know if the wins come through variance/luck, or they actually have an edge.

Bullshit! The advantage of beating Blackjack is not from flat betting. You bet bigger when the cards are in favor and less when it is not. They use teams that come in and give up the count. The searcher uses a small bet to get the count and the big player comes in with the count handed to them and takes over with huge bets. This alone refutes your beliefs.

[winforus]

I'm not as stupid as the pit bosses or you for that matter. Yet the pit bosses see every one of my win streaks. How is that?  You do play in real casinos, right? You have seen this haven't you? I really wonder.

Pit bosses see them when they have already happened. Pit bosses don't make any bets. You make your bets before it happens, not after it has already happened. That is the difference.

[winforus]

Bullshit! The advantage of beating Blackjack is not from flat betting. You bet bigger when the cards are in favor and less when it is not. They use teams that come in and give up the count. The searcher uses a small bet to get the count and the big player comes in with the count handed to them and takes over with huge bets. This alone refutes your beliefs.

This is a very bad example - apples and oranges. Blackjack players get their edge from counting cards! That is where their advantage comes from. They turn a -EV bet into +EV bet by increasing odds in their favor.

To increase the odds in your favor in Roulette, you need to increase the accuracy of your predictions/bet selections.

If you are unable to predict when the win streak happens or ends - it means you don't increase the odds in your favor.

Gizmo, Steve and other winning players all talk about these things. For some reason you are unwilling to face the truth.

[Mean]

You do play in real casinos, right?

You fail to understand the very basics. With each spin of the wheel, about half of the people win, and the other half losses.

[gizmotron2]

To increase the odds in your favor in Roulette, you need to increase the accuracy of your predictions/bet selections.

Says you and that horde of rats that think they are enlightened. I don't need to increase the odds in my favor for each spin. I need to increase the odds in my favor for a session.  In the session I'm expected to lose more than I win. So I accept that. To win I must know when to likely defund parts of a losing streak. I can do that. You can't. That is because I have a skill that you don't have.  You openly admit to being able to see win streaks and losing streaks. I will assume that you are not so bone headed as to be able to tell if your bet selections are working or if they are not working. It's not too hard. When you see that steak dinner go across the table to the dealer and get raked away you know that your bet selection is not working.

My mathematical edge is in session awareness and has nothing to do with independent spin results.  You are stuck only looking at one spin at a time.

[Mean]

The advantage of beating Blackjack is not from flat betting.

You can beat blackjack by flat betting. You only bet when you have the edge.

[gizmotron2]

With each spin of the wheel, about half of the people win, and the other half losses.

You are a troll. You are always a loser. Now flip out.

[gizmotron2]

You can beat blackjack by flat betting. You only bet when you have the edge.

Clueless. How old are you? Have you ever been in a casino?

[Mean]

To win I must know when to likely defund parts of a losing streak.

You can't predict when that will happen. You said so yourself.

as to be able to tell if your bet selections are working or if they are not working

Anyone can see if something "worked" after the fact. In fact, no bet selection works; you just get lucky.

When you see that steak dinner go across the table to the dealer and get raked away you know that your bet selection is not working.

This doesn't mean shit. You still have the same probability of winning/losing your next bet/s.

My mathematical edge is in session awareness and has nothing to do with independent spin results.  You are stuck only looking at one spin at a time.

You keep trying to blend your losing method by throwing around the term "session" as if that has anything to do with this.

[Mean]

You are a troll. You are always a loser. Now flip out.

This is an accurate description of yourself.
You are behaving as an elementary school student.

[Mean]

Clueless. How old are you? Have you ever been in a casino?

How old are you, and have you ever been in a casino?

[gizmotron2]

Don't feed the troll !

[gizmotron2]

You can't predict when that will happen. You said so yourself.

So I use the entrails of an owl.

What does it matter. I win you lose. All is well with the world.

Don't feed the troll !

[Mean]

So I use the entrails of an owl.

What does it matter. I win you lose. All is well with the world.

Don't feed the troll !

Who taught you reading randomness? Why did you ever look toward gambling as a source of income to begin with? I am genuinely curious; you pique my interest.

[winforus]

Says you and that horde of rats that think they are enlightened.

Steve and other professional roulette players say this as well.  Are they a horde of rats too? Have you thought, that since they have won more than you, they may be right? Steve explains it on his site, and videos very clearly.

I don't need to increase the odds in my favor for each spin. I need to increase the odds in my favor for a session.

That is a plain fallacy. What you call a "session" consists of individual spins. How can can you increase the odds for a session, without increasing the odds for spins?