Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[gizmotron2]

Steve and other professional roulette players say this as well.  Are they a horde of rats too? Have you thought, that since they have won more than you, they may be right? Steve explains it on his site, and videos very clearly.

Where has Steve managed to exclude variable change from strategic awareness in randomness. He just dismisses it as some kind of Zen master and therefore has no need to address it.  I have you mathZombies exactly where I want you. I've told you what is what and you have rejected it. I don't care. One day you will all see this. You will remember that I showed it to you and that you could not see it.  I have even told you the math that applies. Where was everyone at before Ed Thorp and "Beat the Dealer" came out? He changed everything about Blackjack and all he did was discover something that had always been true.

You can't imagine using streaks of wins and streaks of losses so you reject it. You ask completely lame questions about how this and how that. I find that telling on its own.

[gizmotron2]

That is a plain fallacy. What you call a "session" consists of individual spins. How can can you increase the odds for a session, without increasing the odds for spins?

I hope that you are really that stupid. I can't believe that you are just a shill that has trashing duty twice a week. Tag team sycophants patrolling the computer sales forum. Now that's a plausible picture.

[winforus]

Where has Steve managed to exclude variable change from strategic awareness in randomness.

When did I say this? Why are you saying the stuff that I didn't say? This was my original quote and Steve has hammered this point very frequently:

To increase the odds in your favor in Roulette, you need to increase the accuracy of your predictions/bet selections.

You can't imagine using streaks of wins and streaks of losses so you reject it.

I reject plain delusion. You packed things into "streaks", yet you don't see that those streaks consists of numbers - and you still need to increase the accuracy of your bet selections on those numbers, to produce a winning streak.

[winforus]

I hope that you are really that stupid. I can't believe that you are just a shill that has trashing duty twice a week. Tag team sycophants patrolling the computer sales forum. Now that's a plausible picture.

Whenever you are backed into a corner and you run out of bullshit to say - you immediately start insulting others.

I have broken down your fancy packed BS into pieces, and now everyone can see the full picture.

[Mean]

I can't believe that you are just a shill that has trashing duty twice a week.

Only twice??? A week. More like twice every four hours.

[gizmotron2]

Whenever you are backed into a corner and you run out of bullshit to say - you immediately start insulting others.

I have broken down your fancy packed BS into pieces, and now everyone can see the full picture.

All you have done is attempted to create a construct that has you as the brilliant protagonist. You are still ignorant of what I have given to others freely. That is the missing thing in all this. You already know it can't work so your best scientific approach is confirmation bias. That makes you simply a doo doo head.

I just laugh that if I use you as a whipping boy you then have proof that you are brilliant.  It's so one stepped.

[winforus]

All you have done is attempted to create a construct that has you as the brilliant protagonist. You are still ignorant of what I have given to others freely. That is the missing thing in all this. You already know it can't work so your best scientific approach is confirmation bias. That makes you simply a doo doo head.

I just laugh that if I use you as a whipping boy you then have proof that you are brilliant.  It's so one stepped.

Fact remains: You have done this for 20 years and have a losing record on both RS (13 resets)and MPR.Countless of excuses and BS.

Anyone with a brain could tell you are not making any money with RR - you are just craving attention and admiration.

As others have said, you should get some professional help.

[gizmotron2]

Fact remains: You have done this for 20 years and have a losing record on both RS (13 resets)and MPR.Countless of excuses and BS.

It must be rewarding presenting sophistry and then polishing your spandex. Everything changed three years ago. I'm tired of telling what.

And I'm just getting started with what works for me at R-Sim.

Let's try this from another angle. You are a loser because you only have old fashioned absolutism formed probability. You don't have Reading Randomness, and you probably need a few more years before Steve will give you one of his computers. Keep up the home front.

[gizmotron2]

“It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so. “ â€" Mark Twain

[Mean]

It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so. “

Ignorance is bliss

[gizmotron2]

Ignorance is bliss

"Bliss." That's your mom's name. It's a contraction of Bling & Liss.
Your name is a contraction too. It comes from Meaning & Liss. The long form of your name is Meaningliss.

[Mean]

The long form of your name is Meaningliss.

That was meaningless. This is meaningless. We're all meaningless.

[Mean]

What's a troll? Do you just label anyone a troll who vehemently disagrees with you?

[Steve]

I will report excessive naysaying post to Steve.

If Steve doesn't take action the same way with excessive claims, I'm done with this forum.

You reported your own post. Report posts you think are a problem.

[Steve]

@Gizmotron
What's your excuse for not being a trillionaire? Do you feel too much empathy for the casinos? 

This post was reported, but not removed. It borders between trolling and a fair question. Again it's borderline.

There have been lots of reporting lately. Please everyone carefully consider the rules, and my examples of borderline, before reporting.