Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[gizmotron2]

I'm glad that somebody reported some of this stuff. I was just going to let him blab and blab along.

[Mean]

.

[Mean]

I'm glad that somebody reported some of this stuff. I was just going to let him blab and blab along.

You act like a baby. You cry whenever someone challenges your delusions.

[gizmotron2]

You act like a baby. You cry whenever someone challenges your delusions.

You are not contributing to discussion. Where is your money making expertise?

I'm coming for you guys.

[Mean]

@Gizmotron
If you had anything, you’d be able to clearly state what you have. You wouldn’t have to encode it in a bunch of nonsense.

[gizmotron2]

@Gizmotron
If you had anything, you’d be able to clearly state what you have. You wouldn’t have to encode it in a bunch of nonsense.

It's a skill. "The best way to Carnegie Hall is practice, practice, practice."

The schooling starts with seeing trends and patterns in a live play chart by use of the skill of visual dexterity. That is not encoded nonsense. That instruction is not at this gambling forum. It's at another location so that I would only have to write it once. What is here are questions and answers because people here wanted to discuss it.  With that comes know-it-all mathZombies that have everything in gambling all worked out. Just ask them. They will tell you why discussion is so unnecessary. I know that you hope one day to be significant. Just keep trashing. You will impress somebody.

[Ross]

    "the skill of visual dexterity"

Well that's an aspect of playing roulette that I
haven't come across before.  Joke of the week.

Got any more like that Gizmo?

[gizmotron2]

Well that's an aspect of playing roulette that I
haven't come across before.  Joke of the week.

Oh no, another uninformed voter.

Perhaps a picture is at least worth a few words. This is from page one of the teaching thread. That is the place were real people get informed before they open their traps and show how smart they really are.  I go on to show and explain everything without it ever leaving anyone with a mystery. So this is your first lesson.

[Ross]

  "the skill of visual dexterity"

So it just means moving your eyes.. who'd have guessed?

[gizmotron2]

So it just means moving your eyes.. who'd have guessed?

Yeah, hahaha LOL. It's nothing more than seeing trends and patterns in a chart.  There are people that keep track of results in matrix style. To analyze them you must think what it means. Try to think what 6 independent groups mean times 20 different primary trend or pattern types, then look at the effectiveness chart for w / L, wins and losses, and come up with the best looking condition in 10 to 20 seconds. You can't do it with a matrix. That would take 20 minutes.  You must have a skill to see these trends and patterns in a quick glance without trying to assemble them in your mind first.

It's like this: red, red, red, black, red, red, red,  black, red, red, red, black,

Or this:  X X X * X X X * X X X *

One way you must think it together the other you can just quickly see it. That's what visual dexterity is used for in Reading Randomness.

At a real live B&M casino I have to watch for the dealer not to wipe any winning bets. Once that is cleared I can look down at my playing chart and enter the results of the latest spin. While the dealer is paying off I can look for a best opportunity. I then check that I have been paid off correctly. Now the dealer picks up the dolly and you can start placing the next bets. All this takes about 30 to 90 seconds . You only have a short time before "no more bets." There is no time to reason out what trends or patterns there might be.

Example chart:

Code Select Expand


W | B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  01  --  02 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  02  --  25 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  03  --  16 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  04  --  31 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  05  --  18 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  06  --  22 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  07  --  27 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  08  --  04 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  09  --  22 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  10  --  05 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  11  --  21 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low


[Mean]

At a real live B&M casino I have to watch for the dealer not to wipe any winning bets.

If you could really beat roulette, you'd just focus on the 3 even chance groups and bet big. There'd be no need to watch for swiped bets; everything would be so much easier. Btw, you would be a billionaire or trillionaire as well.

Your system doesn't beat the math of roulette, and there's no getting around that.

[gizmotron2]

For those of you looking into Reading Randomness a situation happened today where the Global Effect was in strong form and I still lost because I read it wrong and didn't use it much at all. Let's see if you can see it? Here is the live play chart for that losing game today at R-sim:

Code Select Expand


| B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |
| X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |
|    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |
|    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |
|    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |
|    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |
|    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |
|    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |
| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |
|    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |
| X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |
| X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
| X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |
| X    | X    |    X | X    | X |   |
|    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |
|    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |
|    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |
|    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |
|    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |
|    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |
| X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
| X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
| X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |
| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |
| X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
|    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |
| X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |
|    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |
| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |
|    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |
| X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |
|    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |
|    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |
| X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |
| X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |
| X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |
|    X |    X |    X | X    | X | X |
|    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |
|    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |
|    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |
| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |
| X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
|    X | X    |    X | X    | X | X |
| X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |
|    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |
| X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |
|    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |
|    X | X    |    X | X    | X | X |
| X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |
|    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |
| X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |


It's a magnificent example of the Global Effect too.

[Bigbroben]

I still lost because I read it wrong
It's a magnificent example of the Global Effect too.

...or of the nature of randomness...

[winforus]

Gizmotron's EC bets are 400 (highest I seen). He is currently up 435. This mean that he is only up around 1 unit, after all of these games.

Here is how his chart looks like: link:s://prnt.sc/vcusfz

His results indicate once again that his bet selections are no better than random (he is break even, won 1 unit lol).

This time he wants to blame his losses on the fact that "he read it wrong". He will always find the next excuse, but will never admit that RR is a losing method.

[gizmotron2]

This time he wants to blame his losses on the fact that "he read it wrong". He will always find the next excuse, but will never admit that RR is a losing method.

It's very good that you have your proof that it doesn't work.