Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[nottophammer]

Gizmo
Just using sequences from the mat.
So, fcuk em, you keep at it.

[nottophammer]

ND aka tam
thought you gave up RF

[Mean]

It's very good that you have your proof that it doesn't work.

I have my proof. It's in the math. You cannot predict better than less than 50% for each spin, 25% for two spins in a row, etc. You lose; math wins.

[winforus]

It's very good that you have your proof that it doesn't work.

You have 13 resets on RS + currently breaking even. You also have a losing record on MPR. How does this not serve as proof that it doesn't work?

Or do you think that people are that stupid, that they would ignore this proof right in front of their eyes?

[gizmotron2]

"When you get the answer you are looking for, hang up."

link:s://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/d48572c2-6027-4822-8010-a860658bae43

[nottophammer]

Gizmo
This should be on other forum, where Dr dickhead, AKA too many to type, The General.
On red/black betting.

[nottophammer]

Carried on watching how the red/black is trending.
The red did well; didn't get 37 red in a row.

[gizmotron2]

There's one bet that is the very best. There is the weak side and there's the strong side. It changes back and forth for every Even Chance bet location.  It just chugs along all day long going from one side to the other.  All you have to do is figure out how to get on them and to ride the waves if you can.

[nottophammer]

For you Gizmo, what's trending?

Perhaps Chips could code it in 10 mins, over at GF

[gizmotron2]

Yes, it's always fun to start a conversation by ridiculing's of Dr. Dickhead.

The trick in all this is nothing more than probing for effective moments and pouncing on them when they work.

There really is no need to program this. You just get better and better at getting on early and getting off quickly at hitting the strong sides. Yep, I search for chop as well. It has nice streaks too.

I have found that there are two ways to play. You can get out on the first moment that you reach your stop win point in each session or you play for a fixed amount of time, say 3 to 4 hours where you get from 120 to 150 spins. In this case you just take whatever your aggregate win total brings you based on the quality of that session's streaks pay.

Like I have suggested for more than a decade, there are times when similar sizes of things swarm even when each type of characteristic may be different. It's important to become aware of these things. Most people never see these rhythmic type of coincidences. They never look for this type of quality so it goes non exploited.

I always laugh at how smart people try to present themselves while ignoring bags of gold sitting right underneath their noses. This somehow make me the idiot.  Even when you show them clear examples of these they can't see them. I suppose human nature is far more important than opportunity squandered.

[Mean]

You never explain how you can win. There's an uneven payout, 35 to 1 for each number. There are 37 numbers. Math wins in the long run.

[Mean]

I suppose human nature is far more important than opportunity squandered.

I could spend all my time and effort running a business and actually make money or I can waste my life trying to do what's impossible, like beating roulette by reading randomness.

[gizmotron2]

I could spend all my time and effort running a business and actually make money or I can waste my life trying to do what's impossible, like beating roulette by reading randomness.

I could possibly be the first poly extreme athlete ever. I could have had three careers, worth satisfaction, Skilled craftsman to real-estate developer, computer research and development, music industry recording studio designer and builder, pilot, musician, golfer with a single digit USGA handicap, and in this area a gambler. I set out to accomplish things and try to reach a highest degree of skill and capability. This is no different. Your obvious greatness comes from being a very good irritating pest. I congratulate you on this and hope that this is your greatest  achievement in life. Perhaps the molded surface of your backside has melted into the couch in grandma's basement serves you best. That would make a good impression of you as well.

So why are you like you are?

[gizmotron2]

You never explain how you can win.

Bet bigger amounts when you are winning and bet smaller amounts when you are losing.  I don't know how to explain to you winning and losing because you have never registered a capacity to understand these simple concepts.

Proof of that is in your very statement just now. I have clearly explained these simple concepts. It sort of begs many questions. But if I ask them some people might think I'm picking on you.

[precogmiles]

Gizmo have you demonstrated anything yet?