Reading Randomness ( The Real Way ) @ Roulette Simulator

[gizmotron2]

Gizmo have you demonstrated anything yet?

So far three times 50 wins in a row without a loss. But that style of betting became subject to a claim of using a progression. Then I did 50 games in a row flat betting and showed what I said that I could hardly break even. Then I started doing something now with John Patrick's 2, 1, 2 "Up & Pull" method.

But I have a better idea. I'm thinking of just going after strong side weak side in the EC's and flat betting. I will use virtual bets, spins without bets, and one size bets from 90 to 110 units. I'm also considering not stopping at 3 net wins. Just going to go after 100 to 150 spin sessions and see what I can see.

How about you? I see you on top sometimes and then your missing. Then you are back again on top. Does R-Sim not show all the people on top at times?

[Mean]

I could possibly be the first poly extreme athlete ever. I could have had three careers, worth satisfaction, Skilled craftsman to real-estate developer, computer research and development, music industry recording studio designer and builder, pilot, musician, golfer with a single digit USGA handicap,

These things are all great and all.

Bet bigger amounts when you are winning and bet smaller amounts when you are losing

How do you know when you're winning/losing? Obviously, there isn't a magical number, where say I won the past 3 or 4 spins, so now I should start betting big. Right?

Can you wait til you see something within 20 spins to determine if something is working?

[winforus]

Bet bigger amounts when you are winning and bet smaller amounts when you are losing.  I don't know how to explain to you winning and losing because you have never registered a capacity to understand these simple concepts.

Proof of that is in your very statement just now. I have clearly explained these simple concepts. It sort of begs many questions. But if I ask them some people might think I'm picking on you.

You clearly don't understand these concepts either, as you are currently only up 1.5 units after playing for a considerable amount of time.

You bet 370 on EC, and you are up 515, or just breakeven. Here is the screenshot of your results so far: link:s://prnt.sc/vebawc

If RR had any merit and was legit, you would be up now 100+ units easily, if not more. Your proof is on RS and this time, you had ran out of excuses.

[gizmotron2]

If RR had any merit and was legit, you would be up now 100+ units easily, if not more. Your proof is on RS and this time, you had ran out of excuses.

I'm not making excuses. I'm just getting you on record. Thank you.

[winforus]

I'm not making excuses. I'm just getting you on record. Thank you.

Explain then why are you having such poor results with RR? Why are you only breaking even?

[Mean]

I'm not making excuses. I'm just getting you on record. Thank you.

You aren't really recording this, are you?

[Mean]

N/A

[gizmotron2]

Explain then why are you having such poor results with RR? Why are you only breaking even?

I get lazy and because it's not real money I get tired of slogging away for a win. I haven't been to a live casino in almost a year. Just look at my losses. I just sit there repeating the same bet for a while because it's a hassle to load all those inside bets. My practice software is a single button click and it loads my custom sets automatically.  I can switch from chart mode to graph mode instantly and back again. All my losses are apathy related. That's why I'm going to attempt to use a method that allows me to use the hold feature that keeps the last bet and places it for you. I know this sounds lame but you can see that I stop trying and just start pressing the repeat button.  It doesn't matter If I prove I can win. It only matters if I can teach others to win. It's fun to tease some people that are irritating at times. All I have to do is lose just enough to give them ammunition and they take pot shots at me. So it's not a total loss.

Just let me use R-sim to see if I can play strong side weak side with lots of repeated bets using the hold feature.  I should get less lazy, hopefully.  Plus this will allow me to do a lot of spins in a very short time.  With my practice software I can get my 4.66 win to loss ratio because the bets are easy to place. I've learned a lot about me because of R-sim.  At a live casino there's like 2 minutes between spins. That's 30 spins in an hour. 

[Mean]

I have the holy grail. I can win 60% of the time. I'm just too lazy to play it. Does anybody want to see me play it on RS. Btw, if I lose, it's just because I was too lazy to use it properly. But that doesn't matter, because I'm teaching people where to bet.

[winforus]

I get lazy and because it's not real money I get tired of slogging away for a win.

Again with the same old excuse? When you are winning, it's RR, and when you lose - it's you getting bored, losing on purpose, or some other BS reason.

It doesn't matter If I prove I can win.

That's not what you said in beginning. In beginning, you clear goal was to show yourself winning. It matters when you win, but doesn't matter when you lose - you are a funny guy.

It only matters if I can teach others to win.

You can't teach something others, something that you can't do yourself.

The difference between winners and losers, is that winners don't make excuses and that they win. You talk the talk, but don't walk the walk.

Precogmiles has been winning, without a single excuse. You can learn a lot from him.

[gizmotron2]

OK, now it's official. Reading Randomness does not work.

Goodbye

[Mean]

OK, now it's official. Reading Randomness does not work.

Goodbye

It works...for the casino.

[nottophammer]

As i said Giz, you carry on.

[Mean]

I won three units by reading randomness 

[winforus]

OK, now it's official. Reading Randomness does not work.

Goodbye

Gizmotron you are now at -5485 : link:s://prnt.sc/vf7uwa Those 3 last losing sessions came in yesterday, so I hope that you finally realized that RR doesn't work.

There is no shame in admitting that your mistakes. Maybe you can now move on to a better method, like precognition? Precogmiles have had success with it, and I am also having decent results so far with it.