To Validate Precognition or Reading Randomness?

[gizmotron2]

To Validate Precognition or Reading Randomness?

What will it take to move Precognition or Reading Randomness from a subjective theory to and objective confirmation state?

The debate today is over the number of spins or the number of sessions played. In other words it must pass the test of validated large numbers. It must refute mathematical and statistical beliefs. Neither method depends an a mathematical algorithm in order for it to be effective. Reading randomness can use recognition and reaction type algorithms but I doubt that you could teach a computer to do precognition. I have found that it is much easier and faster to just program people instead.

I have a work in progress example of what I do at R-sim. The one good thing is that it shows every bet placed. But just how many games must be played in order for proof of validation to occur.  I mean there have already been suggestions that it is a unique capability and further suggests that only I can do it. I'll keep going. It's still not boring to me at this point.

I know it can all be dismissed as a lucky streak. But I have already stated clearly that it works because it targets lucky streaks on purpose. I know that common randomness flows in waves and phases. Even a noob gambler betting on their pet favorite numbers experiences ups & downs at different times.  I don't think I need to validate the existence of streaks. 

So I guess at this point all I have done is to initiate curiosity on a slightly higher level.  I must admit that some of the repeat trackers are having similar good luck. I'm not sure about what the general consensus on all that is at this point. It's all Turbo country. I do know what the resistance to his opinions are leveled at. 

[INTERCEPTOR]

I think neither method will work in real casinos, only working on r-simulator, sorry to disappoint you.

[precogmiles]

I think precognition has already been validated. Read the peer reviewed journal. Read research papers. Do your own investigation and research.

At the moment the mechanism and theory have not been verified, but as a phenomena it does exist.

I have used it successfully with roulette.

In terms of public roulette proof or evidence.

On MPR, 3 players in the top 10 have 'precog' in their name and the person in first place is called intuitive.

I have got into the top 10 on roulette simulator, numerous times.

Annecdotal evidence is available on this forum just read the precognition threads. Nowun has YouTube videos and others gave mentioned real world play numbers.

But all of this is unnecessary. It works for me and that is all that matters.

[gizmotron2]

I think neither method will work in real casinos, only working on r-simulator, sorry to disappoint you.

Actually I do way better at B & M casinos. Up until now I have struggled with on-line live casinos because of time constraints between the placement of bets being placed in time. R-sim in the regulated mode allows me to take my time between bets. I have plenty of time to track past spins, chart them, make sure I'm paid correctly or that a winning bet is not wiped from the table by the dealer, and to make my bet selection and get the next bet down in time. I can hardly keep up at a Rapid Roulette console but I can do it.  MPR is too fast. I had to abandon my inside bets on that platform. I can't get bets down in time on the usual no players - live online wheels. I think they might stitch video together on those perhaps. The only place I really trust is the real in your face B&M casinos.

Hope that helps. I trust R-sim to not target me with algorithms. I'm not so sure about single player RNG games online.

[gizmotron2]

But all of this is unnecessary. It works for me and that is all that matters.

Yet you are here at this forum defending it. I'm just considering the fact that there will not be a throng running to grab those bags of gold anytime soon. I mean they went nuts when "Beat the Dealer" was published by Edward O. Thorp. I'm not seeing much resistance to RR or Precognition capabilities. It just sits there in a category that if it works for you then go ahead and use it. It does for me. It does for you.

[precogmiles]

then go ahead and use it. It does for me. It does for you.

Yes good fir you, keep it up if its working. That is all that matters. Most people do not deserve this knowledge, they are too brainwashed by the cult of materialism.

[gizmotron2]

Yes good fir you, keep it up if its working. That is all that matters. Most people do not deserve this knowledge, they are too brainwashed by the cult of materialism.

I call it basic human nature. I think almost all people have to deal with it until they discover that wanting people to like them that they don't even know does not give them rewards. Getting all that junk sold on TV doesn't work. My first reward to myself was mountain climbing and rock climbing. My reward for that was that I was considered crazy. I was truly inflicted by windsurfing. But that again was a fringe activity. There were just a handful of us that would commute to the Sacramento Delta to get hammered every night all summer long with 25 - 45 MPH winds.  I got a lot of equipment for that sport. But it was three times more fun than extreme ski mountaineering. It took a catastrophe for me to learn that becoming a millionaire, a road I was well on the way of, was the worse thing I could have done. There is far more to life than just what I want or think that I need but really don't.

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=wDGwAoLhJE4 

[Moxy]

But all of this is unnecessary. It works for me and that is all that matters.

Hey what do you know.  I believe, therefore I also am.

[precogmiles]

Hey what do you know.  I believe, therefore I also am.

Any advice for me oh great one?

[Moxy]

It does for me. It does for you.

As well as yours tru-ly.

[Moxy]

Any advice for me oh great one?

Be water, my friend.

[winforus]

But all of this is unnecessary. It works for me and that is all that matters.

This. And if I ever get to a point, where I would be winning big sums, you can be sure you wouldn't hear from me about it. In fact, there are already people out there who are crushing casinos with precognition - but they surely are keeping it to themselves.

As Steve said, once you got it - it's all about how much you can get away with, without being detected.

[precogmiles]

This. And if I ever get to a point, where I would be winning big sums, you can be sure you wouldn't hear from me about it. In fact, there are already people out there who are crushing casinos with precognition - but they surely are keeping it to themselves.

As Steve said, once you got it - it's all about how much you can get away with, without being detected.

Completely agree they are out there and using it for many different things. You can use precognition for trading too.

[Moxy]

Completely agree they are out there and using it for many different things. You can use precognition for trading too.

I use it to guess woman's age.  I get slapped every single time.  What gives?

[Joe]

In fact, there are already people out there who are crushing casinos with precognition - but they surely are keeping it to themselves.

If they are 'surely keeping it to themselves', how do you know there are people out there crushing the casinos? In your opinion, perhaps, but not 'in fact'.