Tested and surviving!

[Steve]

I know i dont know everything.

I at least know the basics, so i know what has already been proven to fail. Most people don't even know these basics.

So they repeat the same mistakes, each tine thinking they tried something new.

[Steeefan2014]

I know i dont know everything.

I at least know the basics, so i know what has already been proven to fail. Most people don't even know these basics.

So they repeat the same mistakes, each tine thinking they tried something new.

As far as I know, I like to think that I know the basics and I try not to repeat the same mistakes I've done before. I never said that I rediscovered the fire, just the I found something that it's working... on the long run! And I don't think that more than 500k spins (what I showed here and other tests that I've done) are just pure luck. I guess we'll have to wait and see. I'm playing for real money and it's working up until now!

[ati]

Good luck!
I notice on your charts that there are very long waiting periods. It's pointless to test only, or mostly against real wheel spins, I assume you would never wait 500 spins at a real wheel to place one or two bets. And I know that there is no difference between a fair RNG and an unbiased wheel.

Here's a tip to speed up the game. You can play basically unlimited independent games at the same time with one random number generator. So you'd have more betting opportunities. E.g. normally you have numbers 0 to 36, but you could also pair double streets in two spins, like 1-1, 1-4, 5-3, etc. there are 36 possible outcomes, and those have the exact same randomness as the regular roulette numbers. I'm sure you can figure out how to place the bets. The funny thing is that after the first double street, you already know if your created outcome is going to be low or high number.

[Steeefan2014]

Good luck!
I notice on your charts that there are very long waiting periods. It's pointless to test only, or mostly against real wheel spins, I assume you would never wait 500 spins at a real wheel to place one or two bets. And I know that there is no difference between a fair RNG and an unbiased wheel.

Here's a tip to speed up the game. You can play basically unlimited independent games at the same time with one random number generator. So you'd have more betting opportunities. E.g. normally you have numbers 0 to 36, but you could also pair double streets in two spins, like 1-1, 1-4, 5-3, etc. there are 36 possible outcomes, and those have the exact same randomness as the regular roulette numbers. I'm sure you can figure out how to place the bets. The funny thing is that after the first double street, you already know if your created outcome is going to be low or high number.

Thanks!

You are right, there are times when you have to wait longer until you place a bet. But... with a bot that can be solved. You don't have to stay forever in front of the PC. Yes, it might be an issue when you go to a real casino.

Anyway, I am playing online only so it's ok for me. I don't mind waiting as long as I am winning. Thanks for the tip  though!

[daddyPIG]

Steefan - Will post my results soon! not a 48k spins on rx-code but in real game!

don't think you can use a bot with a long waiting playing online!? they'll kick you off for inactivity!

unless you can find a casino that never kicks you out without doing anything for a long period of time?

Anyway... why dont you show us your real game results and not just graphics?

[Steeefan2014]

Steefan - Will post my results soon! not a 48k spins on rx-code but in real game!

don't think you can use a bot with a long waiting playing online!? they'll kick you off for inactivity!

unless you can find a casino that never kicks you out without doing anything for a long period of time?

Anyway... why dont you show us your real game results and not just graphics?

1. A bot can be programmed to place a non-lose bet from time to time (e.g. 1 unit on red, 1 unit on black) and this shows activity on the table
2. I will not show any of my real playing activity! This will disclose my system.
3. There will always be something more that you will need in order to prove something. You'll never be satisfied.
4. You still haven't shown any better results.... until then... forget it.
5. Why are you interested in seeing more proofs?

[daddyPIG]

typical... cant prove anything.. forget it.

don't need proof of videos.. don't need that.

and keep it to yourself.. good luck on making a fortune...

[Steeefan2014]

typical... cant prove anything.. forget it.

don't need proof of videos.. don't need that.

and keep it to yourself.. good luck on making a fortune...

Up until now, RX graphs were mandatory! Now that they are showed, account status is required! What next? My bank account and the pin code of my credit card? Really??

It's easy to talk and throw stones. I showed stats of my system. Aprox 400k spins. I asked for more spin files to prove that it's working!

Anyway, it's crystal clear to me: if it's free, it's bs. If it's not free, you need proofs. You get proofs, you ask for more proofs. You get more proofs, you ask for something more. If you don't get it, we're back to square 1 - it's bs.
And all this w/o showing something better or even close to that!

Whatever...

[Steve]

It's not hard for a system to win in 10k,100k or even 1m spins. Mostly it can be done by repeating tests.

[Steve]

Up until now, RX graphs were mandatory! Now that they are showed, account status is required! What next? My bank account and the pin code of my credit card? Really??

The point is anyone can show a winning chart or bankroll trend. They aren't showing the bigger like mpr is designed to do. That's why the talkers cant beat mpr.

[Steeefan2014]

The point is anyone can show a winning chart or bankroll trend. They aren't showing the bigger like mpr is designed to do. That's why the talkers cant beat mpr.

One of my charts had 300k spins. Not 100 or 500.
Today I will run a file with 500k spins and post it here.

Steve, not even you, in your challenge, said anything about MPR! Now, suddenly, MPR is the mother of all tests? What's the point of RX then?

Ok, let's say I will play on MPR! What will be next?

[Steve]

Nope. read back what I've said in many posts.

And don't test repeatedly with the same spins, or source. Or you can get unrealistic results.

In any event, if you can win, just do it.

[Steeefan2014]

And don't test repeatedly with the same spins, or source. Or you can get unrealistic results.

I'm testing with different sets of spins from different sources. Otherwise, I would be lying myself. It's in my interest too to have a winning system.

[pepper]

MPR

I would really like if mpr would at least indicate how many numbers players are betting on and if they're using progression. This would be really useful, because, e.g., someone flat betting and winning over thousands of spins proves a lot more than someone using progression.

[pepper]

Perhaps the win rate is a good measure to counter what I just said