VIDEO 4: Roulette Strategy Secrets | Mistakes to AVOID

[Azim]

I will then make a guess as to what the next winner will be

I knew that was coming.. 

[Azim]

100 spins

Steve, he can do that with MPR too and play 100 spins with a larger chip value and be on the leaderboard.

[Steve]

I'm not interested in anything so short-term unless there's other supporting data.

[gizmotron2]

Here, instead of going back and forth with wasting time and frustration, let's do what Gizmotron2 wants to do:

There is no point in asking for the specifics of a simple algorithm if you can't handle a simple concept like singles on the weak side. So I'm forced to change my beliefs a little. Some people are easier to program than a computer but not all people. 

[Kairomancer]

Gizmo, your explanations about RR are adequate and easy to understand, but there are too much noise and too little essence in your main topic.

Anyone, even a small child can grasp it when properly communicated.

The way I see it, most guys are not interested in reading your long-winded essays of self-promotion on how awsome and brilliant and savy gambler/adventurer you are, or your flooded thread over there at gf.com with your fascination of bullying "spandex boys", basically anyone who have a disagreement with what you say, or what they falsly presume about it.

Having said that they arrogantly assume they know better to form a fair opinion.
Frankly there is no point to blame them. If you would really care to communicate your ideas in a concise and streamlined way. They would care to read and test it.
All it takes is to be sincere, consistent with your claims and publishing a short, but well organized and concise pdf guide with examples.

Secondly you need to show up some tangible evidence, so others can relate and supply them with enough motivation to validate your "experiments", until then no one will take you seriously.

Cheap entertainment what is; what you put out is what you get back. It is as simple as that.

[precogmiles]

Gizmo, your explanations about RR are adequate and easy to understand, but there are too much noise and too little essence in your main topic.

Anyone, even a small child can grasp it when properly communicated.

The way I see it, most guys are not interested in reading your long-winded essays of self-promotion on how awsome and brilliant and savy gambler/adventurer you are, or your flooded thread over there at gf.com with your fascination of bullying "spandex boys", basically anyone who have a disagreement with what you say, or what they falsly presume about it.

Having said that they arrogantly assume they know better to form a fair opinion.
Frankly there is no point to blame them. If you would really care to communicate your ideas in a concise and streamlined way. They would care to read and test it.
All it takes is to be sincere, consistent with your claims and publishing a short, but well organized and concise pdf guide with examples.

Secondly you need to show up some tangible evidence, so others can relate and supply them with enough motivation to validate your "experiments", until then no one will take you seriously.

Cheap entertainment what is; what you put out is what you get back. It is as simple as that.

Well said.. But he seems to purposefully want to hide it, as seen by his posts in relation to roulette simulator.

[Kairomancer]

That does not make sense, unless he behaves in a self-sabotaging manner to maintain his trying too hard to convince others of his worth frame. It is a sick mind-game in that case, or could be unintentional.

He acts like in his posts that he wants to get attention, and someone who do cares about recognition of his work and himself by extension. He regularly bumps his own threads and relentlessly promotes his ideas and achievements.
I hope he see this as tough love.

It is challanging task as most people reject him. This must be his life template of being unrecognized and lonesome, so he had to find his own meaning and prove his worth to himself.

I can partially relate, he may refute this and accuse me of projecting though.

[Azim]

This is his quote
"I will then make a guess as to what the next winner will be and from what group of 18 to 19 numbers will be in the winning group."

Look at what he has said, It's a quote of his that I found on one of the forums.

If he did have an approach, there would be no guessing. It would have been a calculated bet.

[gizmotron2]

Gizmo, your explanations about RR are adequate and easy to understand, but there are too much noise and too little essence in your main topic.

Anyone, even a small child can grasp it when properly communicated.

The way I see it, most guys are not interested in reading your long-winded essays of self-promotion on how awsome and brilliant and savy gambler/adventurer you are, or your flooded thread over there at gf.com with your fascination of bullying "spandex boys", basically anyone who have a disagreement with what you say, or what they falsly presume about it.

Having said that they arrogantly assume they know better to form a fair opinion.
Frankly there is no point to blame them. If you would really care to communicate your ideas in a concise and streamlined way. They would care to read and test it.
All it takes is to be sincere, consistent with your claims and publishing a short, but well organized and concise pdf guide with examples.

Secondly you need to show up some tangible evidence, so others can relate and supply them with enough motivation to validate your "experiments", until then no one will take you seriously.

Cheap entertainment what is; what you put out is what you get back. It is as simple as that.

All true and all good advise if I wanted to wreck my own opportunity to use it.

I used the base aspects of human nature to both share it and to protect it at the same time. 

Having been denigrated for over 14 years it was my choice to crap on every naysayer while sharing it. I was under attack from the very start of that thread.  It's all there, the information and the distractions.

My experiences in life goes to my lifestyle as it is compared to people that live out their lives watching TV from their couches. People are lazy and want free stuff. But if the same person comes along that has always been ignored as a crackpot and then explains everything in detail, while also still being marginalized or ignored, then that person would naturally be treated like the boy that cried wolf too many times. So I used that as a weapon against them.

I would tell the truth and show them what really beats Roulette and they would be compelled to reject it.

I have used basic human nature as a weapon in all of this. That includes all the bragging about extreme sports.

None of you were there during those activities. None of you know why I did all those sports. I learned in the very first year of the very first sport that there are no rewards from people that don't understand why to do it. So you actually ignore them and their sedentary existences.

I regard all people this way. I hold them all in contempt but at the same time allow them to throw away their lives, be it sports, greed, salvation by self affirmation, or hatred of others. It's not me that is arrogant. I am humbled by the revelation of my own limitations. Human nature is the enemy. It is like a disease that we all must deal with on our own.

I knew that I would be able to use it on almost all of you. I knew it would protect RR.  This notion came to me last July at the suggestion of another member of that other forum. And it turns out that he was so right. I could share it all, explain it all, answer all questions and it would not wreck things. 

I have always wanted to stuff a dump truck of crap down the throats of the mean spirited and arrogant mathBoyz.

Telling the truth will lead to them discovering one day that in this case the world is no longer flat. And you will have all my indignation in these forums to look back at as to just how I have treated them for their mathematical dogma. So you can decide if I brought all this on myself or if things like "past spins can't prevent future outcomes."  These were presented to me as reasons why I'm defective and that it is always OK to marginalize the messenger.

Some of it I took personally and have long since gone to war over. I'm well versed in the world on Malignant Narcissism, Codependency, and control freaks.  There are people that want to play those games and there are people that want to debate the merits of my information shared. I try to ferret out the motives and then treat according to the mentality exposed.

Most people are normal, even the mathNazis and mathZombies. We all know that players are in different stages of playing experience. We all suffer the little children that adventure off into the lands of progressions.  That's part and parcel of all gambling forums. Their newfound love of a life changing system to gamble by is always the same thing. We don't know because we didn't discover it. It's my secret and I'm only going to give you hints. Or I have a computer that tells me where the ball will come down out of the track. Anything else is baloney. It's all human nature and you are all exposed by your own activity during discussions, including me, a confirmed asshole that could care less.

I just want to thank those that have rejected it. Thank you for your cooperation and your service. To those that are learning it I admire your actions to keep it a secret and in so doing  protecting it in that way. It has value. That is the real secret.

To watch people get confused over the existence of singles on the weak side is interesting. It begs me to wonder the motivation or needs of a person flipping out over the danger that it represents to them or to others that might come near to it. The need not to see it is almost comical. No wonder a discussion can't occur.  It's an interesting level of stupid. I suppose it's just kidding, right? They have to be kidding.

[gizmotron2]

That does not make sense, unless he behaves in a self-sabotaging manner to maintain his trying too hard to convince others of his worth frame. It is a sick mind-game in that case, or could be unintentional.

He acts like in his posts that he wants to get attention, and someone who do cares about recognition of his work and himself by extension. He regularly bumps his own threads and relentlessly promotes his ideas and achievements.
I hope he see this as tough love.

It is challanging task as most people reject him. This must be his life template of being unrecognized and lonesome, so he had to find his own meaning and prove his worth to himself.

I can partially relate, he may refute this and accuse me of projecting though.

All logical observations and conclusions. That all makes sense. It just goes to show that you can think.  I know that it works. I know that I can teach it to a student one on one over several months. I already have my validation to convince myself.

I've been dying of the same heart failure for the past ten years.  I want credit for changing the world of gambling and of mathematics. The notion of the absolutism of the "house's advantage" is BS. I'm convinced that I can give away a HG and it will be rejected until it is too late to use it. That pleases me the most. So my motivations are pure selfishness. I'm walking the jerks right into their own constructed trap. I hope you understand that in a land still filled with cops this is the most civil and pragmatic that I can be, Hand them the truth knowing that they will reject it, tell them to their faces, and watch them eat the big one once they find out I was right. It's far better than wiping them out. They get to congratulate themselves and it's all published for everyone to see across several forums and archives of forums. It's a truth bomb.  Try to consider this in your conclusions. I have been on the same path for decades. I exposed the global effect and the elegant pattern 14 years ago. It's been my thing for at least that long. 

I do get a kick out of people dismissing and rejecting bags of gold waiting to be picked up by skilled experts.

[Kairomancer]

All true and all good advise if I wanted to wreck my own opportunity to use it.

I think if you would think deep enough about it, you would realize the truth. Even if It would be the holy grail indeed, sharing it openly would not affect you in any bad way.

[gizmotron2]

If he did have an approach, there would be no guessing. It would have been a calculated bet.

Want to go climbing? I want to show you the bottom of a 1,000 foot deep crevasse. BTW, they don't make many ropes that long.

So you are now an expert on what has been described as making an educated guess. I can tell from all this just how far you got from my teaching thread.  You went searching for something that confirms your already predisposed beliefs. Why should anyone take your advice?

[gizmotron2]

I think if you would think deep enough about it, you would realize the truth. Even if It would be the holy grail indeed, sharing it openly would not affect you in any bad way.

That's exactly what Junket King said a year ago. I thought about it and concluded that he was right. You are right.

So I started the RR thread over there. A bunch of people here went after it. Who knows how many Guests here are or have worked on it?  But one thing is for sure. It's a s quiet as a mouse fart in the wind. 

I know I can teach it one on one and bring a person along, one step at a time, like making sure they know what singles on the weak side means and looks like in a play chart. Funny how motivated students never get into arguments with me over guessing.

It all comes down to if people have become skillful at it or not. It has very little to do with how I have presented the information. The skill matters. My antagonizing the riff-raff is just me keeping my space free of dirt and debris.

[precogmiles]

That's exactly what Junket King said a year ago. I thought about it and concluded that he was right. You are right.

So I started the RR thread over there. A bunch of people here went after it. Who knows how many Guests here are or have worked on it?  But one thing is for sure. It's a s quiet as a mouse fart in the wind. 

I know I can teach it one on one and bring a person along, one step at a time, like making sure they know what singles on the weak side means and looks like in a play chart. Funny how motivated students never get into arguments with me over guessing.

It all comes down to if people have become skillful at it or not. It has very little to do with how I have presented the information. The skill matters. My antagonizing the riff-raff is just me keeping my space free of dirt and debris.

lol

Gizmo do you understand you have not provided any evidence so far?

You attempted to prove it on MPR but failed.

You attempted to prove it on roulette simulator but failed.

If all you want is recognition then that is your own personal psychological issue. It has nothing to do with a winning method.

[Kairomancer]

There is a pseudo-science to motivation and understanding. People want common experience they can relate first. It needs to be reasonably communicated for it to be easily duplicated. When duplicated properly it leads to increased affinity.

Based on the following concepts you do not want to be understood. There is something opposing in the way inside you.
In this example you said it would ruin it for you.
Also as you said you use it is a form of "vengence" against others for not understanding and rejecting your experience the whole time.

Do you realize that anything you wish to retaliate outside of you is just the outside reflection what is inside you?
So there must be an aspect of yourself that you reject therefore project outside and externalize, so you can validate your experience.