Are you going to get a coronavirus vaccine? Why?

[Taotie]

Here's 3 hours of it on the Joe Rogan show, which now dwarf's CNN in ratings.
bitchute.com/video/GwELlYFhXIfZ/

I watched that one, very interesting. Let's all get through this shit some day, some how.

[algojack]

You should see what he's saying. He's now fully aware of the New World Order and is warning people. Here's 3 hours of it on the Joe Rogan show, which now dwarf's CNN in ratings.
bitchute.com/video/GwELlYFhXIfZ/

If you took the vaccine, oops. You cant do proper research and still take the vaccine - unless you're really thick. It is literally designed to kill you.

Then why did Malone take it? By the way, I tried posting a link to an article about him, but I get a message saying I'm using forbidden words?

Just tried again with another link, I guess I'm not allowed to post them because I'm a newbie.

[Steve]

Then why did Malone take it?

That's a question I asked. Regardless, based on what he's saying now, he understands it was a mistake.

No clickable links are allowed by anyone. It's the only way to stop tonnes of spam.

[Ares289]

Dr Charles Hoffe MD, in his latest update of July 6, 2021 is reporting on the disturbing findings in his patients. He says the mRNA vaccines are plugging up thousands of tiny capillaries in the blood of those who took the ‘vaccine.’ Most will die in a few short years from heart failure.

The spike proteins injected, which are designed to be mass produced in the bodies of the vaccinated, are the cause of the clotting, which is having adverse effects on no fewer than 60 percent of people injected.

Dr Hoffe, who practices medicine at Lytton BC Canada explains:

“We now know that only 25 percent of the ‘vaccine’ injected into a person’s arm actually stays in your arm. The other 75 percent is collected by your lymphatic system and literally fed into your circulation so these little packages of messenger RNA, and by the way in a single dose of Moderna ‘vaccine’ there are literally 40 trillion mRNA molecules.  These packages are designed to be absorbed into your cells. But the only place they can be absorbed is around your blood vessels and the place where they are absorbed is the capillary networks â€" the tiniest blood vessels where the blood flow slows right down and where the genes are released. Your body then gets to work reading and then manufacturing trillions and trillions of these spike proteins. Each gene can produce many, many spike proteins. The body then recognises these are foreign bodies so it makes antibodies against it so your are then protected against COVID. That’s the idea.”


But here’s where the problem comes. In a coronavirus that spike protein becomes part of the viral capsule. In other words it becomes part of the cell wall around the virus. But it is not in a virus. It is in your cells. So it becomes part of the cell wall of your vascular endothelium.

This means that these cells which line your blood vessels, which are supposed to be smooth so that your blood flows smoothly now have these little spikey bits sticking out.


Dr Hoffe continues:

“So it is absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form because your blood platelets circulate round your blood vessels, and the purpose of blood platelets is to identify damaged vessels and stop bleeding.  So, when the platelet comes through the capillary it suddenly hits all these COVID spikes and it becomes absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form to block that vessel.”

Therefore, these spike proteins can predictably cause blood clots. They are in your blood vessels (if mRNA ‘vaccinated’) so it is guaranteed. Dr Bahrdi then said to me that the way to prove this is to do a blood test called a D-dimer blood test.

“The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.”

Dr Hoffe explains he has been performing D-dimer tests on his mRNA ‘vaccinated’ patients and he has worryingly identified that 62 percent of them had these microscopic blood clots.

“These people have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots. The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot re-generate. When those tissues are damaged by blood clots they are permanently damaged.”

The result, says Dr Hoffe, is that these patients have what is termed Reduced Effort Tolerance (RET) which means they get out of breath much easily than they used to. It is because the blood vessels in their lungs are now blocked up. In turn, this causes the heart to need to work harder to try to keep up against a much greater resistance trying to get the blood through your lungs.

This is called pulmonary artery hypertension â€" high blood pressure in the lungs because the blood simply cannot get through effectively.  People with this condition usually die of heart failure within a few short years.

In conclusion, Dr Hoffe lamented:

“These Shots Are Causing Huge Damage And The Worst Is Yet To Come.”

[algojack]

There are multiple fact-check sites which show that this is false.

A video posted on Facebook claims that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines inevitably cause blood clots.
The July 15 post says “blood clots are a silent killer” and includes a video of Canadian doctor Charles Hoffe, who claims mRNA vaccines cause blood vessels to be lined with COVID-19 spike proteins resulting in blood clots in the majority of vaccine recipients.
“(It’s) because your blood platelets circulate around in your blood vessels, and the purpose of blood platelets is to detect a damaged vessel and block that vessel to stop bleeding. So when the platelet comes through the capillary, it suddenly hits all these COVID spikes that are jutting into the inside of the vessel, it is absolutely inevitable that a blood clot will form to block that vessel,” Dr Hoffe says (video mark 2min 15secs).
At the time of writing, the post had been shared more than 1,400 times. It was posted by the Cameron Sar Fan Page account, which is primarily managed from Australia and has more than 95,000 followers. Mr Sar claims to be president of the Cambodian Broadcasting Network Inc, which is an Australia-based YouTube channel.
Dr Hoffe’s claim has been shared widely on social media, including by Facebook accounts in New Zealand and Australia

The Analysis

It’s true some COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to a small increase in the risk of a rare blood clotting disorder, however there is no evidence that mRNA vaccines increase the risk â€" let alone lead to “inevitable” clots, as claimed by Dr Hoffe in the video.
There are three main types of COVID-19 vaccines: mRNA vaccines, such as the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines; viral vector vaccines, including the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines; and protein subunit vaccines, including the Novavax vaccine.
Both the mRNA vaccines and viral vector vaccines work by giving instructions to cells to make harmless copies of the SARS-COV-2 spike protein, which causes the body to develop antibodies to fight off the virus that causes COVID-19.
The Johnson & Johnson vaccine and the AstraZeneca viral vector vaccines have been linked to a very small increase in the risk of a rare blood clotting disorder.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said after the administration of more than eight million doses of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine in the US there had been 15 cases where recipients developed a clotting condition called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS). All the cases were in women aged between 18 and 59.
Australia’s Department of Health says there is an established link between the AstraZeneca vaccine and blood clots, affecting about four to six people out of every million vaccinated. It recommends people aged under 60 receive the Pfizer vaccine instead due to the higher likelihood of the condition occurring in younger recipients.
The Australian government’s Health Direct website says the mechanism that causes TTS in vaccine recipients is not fully understood and is still being investigated.
In an April article, University of Western Australia associate professor of haematology Matthew Linden said the clotting was caused when the vaccine interacted with proteins in blood platelets, causing an immune response against the platelets â€" which in turn responded by clumping together.
The mRNA vaccines, however, have not been linked to blood clots.
In May, the European Medicines Agency reviewed the incidence of blood clots among mRNA vaccine recipients and found “their frequency is lower than the one occurring in people who have not been vaccinated” and the evidence did not suggest a causal relationship.
The CDC also said blood clots have not been linked to the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines after the administration of more than 210 million doses as of April 23.
University of Auckland vaccinologist Helen Petousis-Harris, who is chair of the World Health Organization’s global advisory committee on vaccine safety, told AAP FactCheck via email that “if mRNA vaccines ‘inevitably caused blood clots’ then we would inevitably see more blood clots occurring in people vaccinated with mRNA vaccines compared with those who are unvaccinated.”
“Given this is not the case, their hypothesis is not supported by epidemiological evidence, ” Dr Petousis-Harris said.
“The notion that there are spike proteins tearing around the vascular system and jutting out of cell walls is flawed. This is not what happens. The amount of spike that can be measured is in the order of picograms and transient.”
One study indicated that very low concentrations of spike proteins could be detected in mRNA vaccine recipients, however one of its authors told AAP FactCheck this did not mean the vaccine could cause harm â€" rather it showed it was working as intended.
Dr Linden also said there was no robust evidence to show that people who received mRNA vaccines were at higher risk of blood clots than the general population.
“To my knowledge spike protein subunit expression on vascular endothelium capable of activating platelets from the circulation has not been demonstrated following mRNA (or adenovirus) vaccine,” he said in an email to AAP FactCheck.
Similarly, the French Society of Haematology told AFP that the purported experiment on which Dr Hoffe based his claims was “not a scientific study, and does not fall under the heading of ‘evidence-based medicine.’ Therefore, no credit can be given to these results”.
University of Queensland biopharmaceutical professor Trent Munro, who worked as part of a team developing a COVID-19 vaccine candidate, told AAP FactCheck that he was “not aware of any statistical, confirmed association with clotting disorders for either the Moderna or Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccines”.
He referred to a study published in Nature in June which looked at the incidence of blood clots following 2.53 million vaccinations in Scotland and found there was no link between the Pfizer vaccine and clotting events.
The Facebook post is an excerpt from a longer video in which Dr Hoffe claims his information comes from German microbiologist Sucharit Bhakdi (video mark 20min 40sec), who has previously spread misinformation about COVID-19 including claiming the pandemic is fake and vaccines will decimate the world’s population.
Dr Hoffe has also spread misinformation on COVID-19 vaccines, including that they are more dangerous than the illness.

The Verdict

Multiple studies have found no causal link between mRNA vaccines and blood clots, while experts also told AAP FactCheck the claim the treatments would lead to inevitable clotting was unsupported by any evidence.

False â€" Content that has no basis in fact.

[Ares289]

There are multiple fact-check sites which show that this is false.

If someone prefers to trust sites that have been created and are financed by people who care about falsifying reality, instead of the opinion of a real DOCTOR who risks a lot to reveal an inconvenient truth, then this is only the problem of such a naive person.

[algojack]

If someone prefers to trust sites that have been created and are financed by people who care about falsifying reality

Any evidence for that? He admits himself that his investigation wasn't a serious scientific study and was not peer reviewed. He is a known anti-vaxxer has made other false claims regarding covid. Only a naive person would get their "news" from facebook.

And it defies common sense. If 62% of people who have taken the vaccine have blood clots then this must amount to 100s of millions of people and hospitals would be flooded with them, yet there is no news about this. Is that a cover-up too??

[Ares289]

He is a known anti-vaxxer has made other false claims regarding covid.

Any evidence for that?

And it defies common sense. If 62% of people who have taken the vaccine have blood clots then this must amount to 100s of millions of people and hospitals would be flooded with them, yet there is no news about this. Is that a cover-up too?

Where in his statement did you read that the negative effects resulting from the presence of blood clots would begin to become apparent IMMEDIATELY after taking this experimental medical preparation?

[algojack]

Any evidence for that?

I asked first. Where is the evidence that fact-checking sites are funded by "people who care about falsifying reality"? And who are those people?

As for your second question, the vaccines have been around for well over a year, and yet there is NO evidence, apart from a very small number of cases relating to the Astrazenica (in younger people) that they cause blood clots. Right now literally billions of people (over half the world's population) have had at least one vaccine, but no alarm signals have been raised about blood clots. On the other hand, the vast majority of people who are still dying from covid have had no vaccine at. So the evidence is exactly the opposite to what this guy is claiming. So what if he is risking his livelihood by claiming it? There could be many reasons why he doesn't care.

[Ares289]

I asked first. Where is the evidence that fact-checking sites are funded by "people who care about falsifying reality"? And who are those people?

I don't have to prove it to you because I never said I'd do it.

As for your second question, the vaccines have been around for well over a year, and yet there is NO evidence, apart from a very small number of cases relating to the Astrazenica (in younger people) that they cause blood clots.

Here you have the answer:

The blood clots we hear about which the media claim are very rare are the big blood clots which are the ones that cause strokes and show up on CT scans, MRI, etc. The clots I’m talking about are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test.

Right now literally billions of people (over half the world's population) have had at least one vaccine, but no alarm signals have been raised about blood clots.

How many cases do you know of people who have been tested for the presence of ANY blood clots after death?

[Klausy]

This guy is a family doctor (from a Google search) from Lytton BC which, from another Google search is a village of around 250 people. Family doctors round here are known as GPs and generally spend their days  treating minor illnesses and yet he is an expert in micro biology and has seen something that thousands or more qualified scientists have missed.

[Ares289]

This guy is a family doctor (from a Google search) from Lytton BC which, from another Google search is a village of around 250 people. Family doctors round here are known as GPs and generally spend their days  treating minor illnesses and yet he is an expert in micro biology and has seen something that thousands or more qualified scientists have missed.

The fact that most experts and scientists are silent about this doesn't mean that they don't know it, anyone who dares to speak out loud about it's very quickly persecuted and effectively discredited so that other people will never dare.

Besides, it just doesn't pay off for them, because they can lose everything, and apart from the gratitude of a certain part of society, they have nothing to gain...

[algojack]

and yet he is an expert in micro biology and has seen something that thousands or more qualified scientists have missed.

Exactly. The people who researched all this are specialists and experts, not doctors in general practice. And to repeat, Dr Hoffe admits that his "study" wasn't peer reviewed and he didn't follow the scientific method. There are other explanations for his results. The guy is a conspiracy theorist.

Hoffe's letter also echoes a common but thoroughly debunked talking point used in conspiracy theorist circles that suggests mRNA vaccines are actually a form of "experimental gene modification therapy."

These vaccines, which include the COVID-19 shots from Pfizer and Moderna, absolutely cannot alter someone's genes.

The fact that most experts and scientists are silent about this doesn't mean that they don't know it, anyone who dares to speak out loud about it's very quickly persecuted and effectively discredited so that other people will never dare.

This just isn't true and it's not the way science and medicine works. There are procedures in place to allow doctors and other medical professionals to raise any concerns they may have about treatments. If "negative" feedback was banned and those who gave it were persecuted there wouldn't be any opportunity to investigate and put things right if issues came to light. Your attitude is clearly paranoid.

If this guy sincerely believes there is a problem he should do a proper study following the scientific method and not just submit some half-assed report, which is all he's done. The reason he's got into trouble is because he is persisting in his anti-vaxxer activities and clearly believes there's a conspiracy. He also thinks the vaccines are "experimental", which is another falsehood.

This article from The Lancet (the oldest and one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical journals) has this to say about vaccines-

Rushing Vaccines: Reporting global efforts to develop COVID-19 vaccines as a “race” while tying it to national identities or imbuing the US COVID-19 vaccine program with Star Trek imagery were not helpful. For years, a central but false tenet of the antivaccine lobby has been that vaccines are not adequately tested for safety. In both the US and internationally, phase 3 trials were well-powered studies of 30,000 to 60,000 human volunteers, equivalent to other large vaccine clinical trials required to license vaccines.


An “average vaccine” requires a 10.7-year timeline beginning with the preclinical phase, whereas COVID-19 vaccine programs may complete clinical testing leading to EUA in less than a year. However, the research on COVID-19 vaccines did not first begin in 2020, but instead built on a decade of previous research on coronaviruses, leading to proof-of-concept for the spike protein as a lead vaccine target. Therefore, when Chinese scientists placed the SARS-2 coronavirus genomic sequence on preprint servers in January 2020, it was possible to quickly adapt previous vaccine concepts to this new virus pathogen. A second accelerant was the use of new mRNA and adenovirus technologies allowing a fast turnaround time from elucidating the genomic sequence to making early prototype vaccines. A third and bona fide speed component was building factories for vaccine manufacturing in parallel with clinical testing. Known as manufacturing “at risk”, this is in contrast to traditional approaches in which vaccines might typically go through full approval before embarking on manufacture. Finally, the first COVID-19 vaccines are already being released through EUA mechanisms due to the lengthy time often required for formal approval of a biologics license application (BLA). American, European, and British national regulatory authorities undertook extensive measures to approximate full BLA approval both in terms of adequately assessing COVID-19 vaccines for efficacy and safety, and inspection of vaccine manufacturing facilities. Ultimately, the COVID-19 vaccines are expected to complete the full licensure process.

[Ares289]

This just isn't true and it's not the way science and medicine works. There are procedures in place to allow doctors and other medical professionals to raise any concerns they may have about treatments. If "negative" feedback was banned and those who gave it were persecuted there wouldn't be any opportunity to investigate and put things right if issues came to light. Your attitude is clearly paranoid.

It would be great to live in your imaginary world, but unfortunately...

- REAL LIFE looks completely different:

Doctors Are Being Persecuted For Telling The Truth About COVID-19


The Great Barrington Declaration, the World Doctors Alliance, America Frontline Doctors â€" these are the stories of the growing movement of doctors whose freedoms are actively trampled on by the medical tyranny of global censorship.

Early on during the COVID-19 pandemic, when fear and uncertainties were running high, Dr. Simone Gold read up on a 2005 study published by the National Institute of Health showing how hydroxychloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. There was also data coming from China and France that backed up the study showing the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in treating the Wuhan Virus, as it was known at that time.

Following the guidelines from these studies, Dr. Gold successfully treated her patients who came into her practice with early onset of the novel coronavirus. Like any competent doctor, she was overjoyed when her patients recovered. Early treatment worked. COVID-19 was not a death sentence.

Feeling accomplished, Dr. Gold anticipated that she would gain recognition and praise for her work. But little did she know, in her mission to inform others of her lifesaving discovery, that she would instead end up being punished for her knowledge.

Not only was Dr. Gold fired by her hospital for daring to present evidence contrary to the ruling narrative, but she was also demonized and bashed throughout the media landscape for “spreading dangerous misinformation” about COVID-19. No one from the media establishment even bothered to interview her patients who had recovered from the virus through this course of treatment. 

However, not to be easily dissuaded, Dr. Gold stood her ground. This was a lifesaving discovery, and it was only right that the public should be made aware of it. In search of a prominent platform that would allow her to share her message (she was, after all, silenced and censored everywhere else), Dr. Gold agreed to give a speech about medical censorship at Capitol Hill on the fateful day of January 6, 2021.

Dr. Gold was fired by her hospital for daring to present evidence contrary to the ruling narrative.

For this, she’s now labeled a domestic terrorist by the FBI and was put on the No-Fly List. But Dr. Simone Gold isn’t the only medical personnel who has been punished for telling the truth about COVID-19.

Killing the Miner’s Canary 

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D, was the head of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene of The Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz. It’s one of the leading medical universities in Germany and is also considered one of the most prestigious universities in the nation. Dr. Bhakdi has published over 300 research papers on immunology, bacteriology, virology, and parasitology, for which he has received numerous awards and the Order of Merit of Rhineland-Palatinate.

In February 2021, Dr. Bhakdi and his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency that the experimental gene-based injections could potentially cause blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis. For this, Dr. Bhakdi was shamed and ridiculed.

Fast forward to today, and practically every COVID-19 vaccine from Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Pfizer have been reported to have triggered blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis â€" just as Dr. Bhakdi previously warned would happen.

Dr. Bhakdi warned the European Medicines Agency that the vaccines could potentially cause blood clots.

But the damage to Dr. Bhakdi’s reputation was complete. He was already denigrated as a “pseudo-scientific nuisance" and given the negative award of the “Goldenen Brett vorm Kopf” by the Society for the Scientific Investigation of Pseudosciences in Germany. To put it simply, Dr. Bhakdi’s name is now forever defamed, even when he was right all along.

First, Do No Harm

If there’s one documentary you need to watch this year, it’s Seeing 2020: The Censored Science of the COVID-19 Pandemic. But don’t bother trying to search for it on Google, because the link to purchase and watch the film can’t be found on the front page of Google’s search engine.   

Court Koshar is a medical doctor and one of the producers of Seeing 2020. Dr. Koshar noticed the peculiarity in the world of medicine during the year 2020. For as long as he had been practicing medicine, he stated, “I had never before seen physicians that were placing blame on children for infecting and killing their grandparents. I’d never before seen physicians refuse to treat patients when they were too afraid themselves to let their patients come into their offices. And I’d never seen the media or politicians essentially drive the way that treatment and healthcare was practiced in America. And I was afraid of what I was seeing.”

Not Allowed To Save Lives

Another physician, Dr. Richard Urso revealed how during the early stage of the pandemic, following the data on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, he had advised doctors to send a patient with acceptable oxygen saturation home with a regiment of HCQ, Zinc, and Azithromycin, but doctors would refuse because they knew they would end up being investigated by the medical board and could potentially lose their license.

“I was quite frightened,” said Dr. Richard Urso, but nevertheless, he decided to go back to work because he felt a duty to heal his patients. “The whole COVID situation was co-opted to create fear not only in the populace, but also created fear in the doctors to treat these patients.”

Read that again: Doctors are afraid of prescribing a treatment that will work because they risk being punished for trying to save their patients’ lives.

Doctors Resisting the Propaganda

Unsurprisingly, there’s a growing movement of doctors and physicians who are tired of the propaganda behind COVID-19. Groups such as The World Doctors Alliance and The Great Barrington Declaration are some of the examples of an international movement of doctors who are raising skepticism about how the COVID-19 problem is being handled. Unsurprisingly, these groups are also demonized and censored by the media.

For example, according to their website, The World Doctor Alliance is “an independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals, and staff around the world who have united in the wake of the COVID-19 response to share experiences with a view to ending all lockdowns and related damaging measures.”

Just like the Seeing 2020 documentary, a quick search on Google for “World Doctors Alliance” will not return their website on the first page of Google's search results. Instead, you'll see article upon article denouncing this group of doctors as irresponsible quacks. But type in the same query on Bing or DuckDuckGo, and you'll see their website as the first one listed at the top of your search.

These doctors and healthcare professionals are doing as much as they can to voice their concerns, but they’re actively silenced by the media, targeted by Big Tech, and persecuted by the government for going against official recommendations.

Official Recommendations with No Relevance to Reality

Doctors have proof that they’re able to successfully treat patients, as well as research findings to back up their treatments. However, in May 2020, a study appeared in The Lancet (one of the most trusted medical journals) that began to cast doubt on the therapeutic treatment of hydroxychloroquine that had worked so well for so many patients.

“When that article came out, it was a body blow to all of us who were treating patients because we knew from what we had seen and observed ourselves, that there was no way that that could be the case. That it (the study) was not true. That it (hydroxychloroquine) was working for people” said Dr. Robin Armstrong, another doctor interviewed in the documentary.

Turns out, the study was outright deceptive, and The Lancet was forced to retract the study. To put this in a simpler perspective, the most prestigious medical journal which had preserved its trusted reputation as an unbiased source of knowledge had to withdraw the so-called “study” for being fraudulent. 

The Lancet published and then retracted a study that cast doubt on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine.

“Even after it was retracted, it was used by Facebook hundreds of times as the basis to block my and other doctors’ videos, statements, repost of legitimate journal articles and scientific publications documenting the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine,” said Dr. Mark McDonald.

As Dr. McDonald stated, “My opinion of the scientific community now is entirely different to what it was from last year. To be clear, what changed isn’t in my view of science, but rather those who speak on behalf of science. Nothing that I see published now can be taken at face value, but instead, I must assume that it has a high chance of bias.”

Dr. Urso concurred: “Hospitals are powerful. Insurance companies are powerful. Pharmaceutical companies are powerful. The outpatient doctor, the individual doctors, like me, we are not powerful. But we are smart. We know medicine much better than insurance and much better than the hospital. Hydroxychloroquine works.”

The Oppression of Medical Tyranny

Unfortunately, these are only a few stories of medical oppression that came up during the course of research for this article. For every one of these doctors, there are countless others who are also enduring the same persecution in silence. 

Dr. David Brownstein, for example, was forced by the Federal Trade Commission to take down videos of interviews he recorded of his own COVID patients whom he successfully treated because his course of therapy didn’t fit the accepted official narrative.

Doctors are afraid â€" losing their license to practice medicine could mean losing everything.

Doctors are afraid. Can you blame them? Apart from the high costs of malpractice insurance and bogus lawsuits, the average debt incurred by a medical student is around $241,000. Losing their license to practice medicine could mean losing everything they’ve worked for tirelessly their entire lives.

The combined powers of the state, Big Tech, the media establishment, and large institutions (like the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) have forced the men and women in medicine to react like an animal at the end of a whip  â€"  always in fear.

Closing Thoughts

While it’s an outright injustice for doctors to lose their licenses for trying to save lives, it’s worse for us because, at the end of the day, it’s we â€" their patients â€" who will end up paying for this growth of medical tyranny with the loss of our own lives.

[Klausy]

Ares - Do you not agree that the Lytton doctor in your first article has almost no credibility to say the things he did? And if so, do you not worry that you may have been influenced by articles on other equally less qualified people?