RHYTHMATRIX RS System

[Colbster]

The question of relevance is,

What are the percentages of position 1 and 2 in detail format for each string length from 4 to 14.

11 sets of seperate data.

If you have it broken down this well, it may serve no purpose other than to fine tune an already favorable bit of data to get an even more profitable entry and exit point, obviously at the cost of possible playing (and therefore, winning) opportunities.

[cht]

If you have it broken down this well, it may serve no purpose other than to fine tune an already favorable bit of data to get an even more profitable entry and exit point, obviously at the cost of possible playing (and therefore, winning) opportunities.

Can you or anyone explain why would position 1 & 2 hit at a higher rate than the others?

Joe wrote this and I wrote I agree. Nope I have not run tests which I can do easily if someone post an explanation why this presumed higher hitrate. What's special about position1&2?

For each string length you should expect to see each position hit the same number of times (percentage) as any other position. It's combining the different string lengths which produces the different percentages.

[Moxy]

Can you or anyone explain why would position 1 & 2 hit at a higher rate than the others?

Joe wrote this and I wrote I agree. Nope I have not run tests which I can do easily if someone post an explanation why this presumed higher hitrate. What's special about position1&2?

A special waste of time is what it is.  Go out on the field and implement your game theory.  It's like wanting know if you're shooting % is at 89 or 90 before you shoot the free throw. 

Just shoot it.

[RHYTHMATRIX RS]

Why don't you try recording some strings and see for yourself, the file provided earlier is totally legit and clearly shows positions 1 and 2 hitting much more than any other positions, this to me is obviously because position 1 has an opportunity to repeat on every length string where as higher positions sometimes never get a chance as the lengths of strings are generally quite low.

It's obvious why positions 1 and 2 hit more frequently when you actually do some testing instead of just being a negative know it all!

cht you're coming across as a cht.

Do some research before you start slating the basics as you're literally doubting the most solid part of the system.

Cheers

[cht]

There was a academic paper published in the math journal few years back that hypothesise that spins after a certain spin length is more likely to appear. The length is 7 if I recall correctly. But there was no hypothesis about the positions on a string which can be tested easily.

[cht]

Which appears to demonstrate that string locations 1 and 2 hit (based on the relatively few instances he has posted) roughly 50/50 with those string locations beyond 2.  Flat betting, 2 numbers at a time (4 if you are running both colors at the same time) for a limited length of time (as was suggested in the OP) is solid from the simplistic math side.  This is very easy to track, doesn't require a staggeringly large bankroll, and hits at a regular interval.  Get in, get out, enjoy the free drinks.

How we all wish this fantasy is true 👍

All these gamblers must be blind and stupid to miss such a mouth watering money making machine. Thank you and OP for pointing this out.

[cht]

Why don't you try recording some strings and see for yourself, the file provided earlier is totally legit and clearly shows positions 1 and 2 hitting much more than any other positions, this to me is obviously because position 1 has an opportunity to repeat on every length string where as higher positions sometimes never get a chance as the lengths of strings are generally quite low.

It's obvious why positions 1 and 2 hit more frequently when you actually do some testing instead of just being a negative know it all!

cht you're coming across as a cht.

Do some research before you start slating the basics as you're literally doubting the most solid part of the system.

Cheers

Good now that your post is approved.

Post on here the explanation why positions 1&2 carry higher probability to hit than the rest of the positions on the string.

Or you have no idea.

I expect you to know since this is the most solid part of your system.

Tell us exactly.

At least I am open minded and prepared to listen. Shoot.

[cht]

The logic behind this is based on the law of the thirds, we would expect to only see a maximum average of around 12 unique numbers then get a repeating number that is already in the string.

The truth is the lengths of the strings are generally half this size and after thousands and thousands of fully recorded strings we found that total string lengths of 5 numbers hits the most from all recorded strings, this is only 4 unique numbers then the repeating number for a total recorded string length of 5 numbers.

You posted this on the other forum.

This idea is no different from Winkel's idea except you merely split the data into 2 parts. This can be done for high low, red black, odd even, left right, top bottom.

The missing link in your claim is,

Why do positions 1&2 carry higher probability than say position 11 and 12 in a 12string length?

Provide this explanation. Convince us.

I don't believe people like Winkel, Steve, dyslexic, TurboG, rrbb and their large number of followers missed this position part since they looked at it from various angles more than a decade ago.

[Colbster]

Why do positions 1&2 carry higher probability than say position 11 and 12 in a 12string length?

1 and 2 obviously are more likely to hit than later because they have the advantage of more opportunities to hit.  If you bet 1 number for 1 spin, you have a 1/37 chance of hitting.  In 4 spins, the same number has nearly a 1/11 chance of hitting.  As the spins increase, the odds of it not hitting become drastically less as demonstrated by (36/37)^x.  Position 11 is 1/37, Positions 1 & 2 are at almost 50/50 to have hit by the time the 12th string rolls around.

[cht]

1 and 2 obviously are more likely to hit than later because they have the advantage of more opportunities to hit.  If you bet 1 number for 1 spin, you have a 1/37 chance of hitting.  In 4 spins, the same number has nearly a 1/11 chance of hitting.  As the spins increase, the odds of it not hitting become drastically less as demonstrated by (36/37)^x.  Position 11 is 1/37, Positions 1 & 2 are at almost 50/50 to have hit by the time the 12th string rolls around.

I think it's best members who are competent in math to discuss in detail from a math standpoint about the relevant probabilities on numbers on a string in the complete picture.

It's possible to calculate the exact probability of each position on a string.

Joe, why not you take up this project?

I am not convinced. There's nothing factual to compel me to look into this idea.

Good luck with this thread.

[RHYTHMATRIX RS]

cht, if you know how to count? simply count the strings with positions 1 and 2 from the file provided!

If you can't count or can't be bothered you should buzz off back to your post of riddles and carry on with your pile crap you keep pushing trying to gain attention for your new YouTube channel.

Cheers

[Bucky09]

Hello there,
Long time lurker, 1st time poster....
CHT, why do you have to be such a rude arrogant tosser all the time? Just because someone isn't a math's genius it doesn't mean they aren't entitled to an opinion. It's screamingly obvious why position's 1&2 hit more. What gives you the right to demand a scientific answer from the OP as to why?
It's people like you that ruin forum's for the majority. Many people are just like me. We may not be Steven fricken Hawkins but we just enjoy playing around with Roulette in it's many forms.
So this method may not be entirely new. It is however a solid way to play. It's non-progressive, easy to follow, backed up by testing and FREE.
Instead of bashing the OP demanding he provides this and that why not help? If you think it's a load of BS tell people why. Just try and do it without sounding like a pompous prick if that's possible....