It works - RNG

[ati]

Okay, here's the result for betting randomly selected 18 numbers for 36 spin cyles, for a total of 5 times 100,000 spins.

[Blueprint]

<a href="link:s://ibb.co/kcVSdf4"><img src="link:s://i.ibb.co/JkWsh4v/Screen-Shot-2019-11-23-at-8-55-00-PM.png" alt="Screen-Shot-2019-11-23-at-8-55-00-PM" border="0" /></a>

[leoncino74]

<a href="link:s://ibb.co/kcVSdf4"><img src="link:s://i.ibb.co/JkWsh4v/Screen-Shot-2019-11-23-at-8-55-00-PM.png" alt="Screen-Shot-2019-11-23-at-8-55-00-PM" border="0" /></a>

The problem rest when and what play...

[Blueprint]

The problem rest when and what play...

I'm only here to provide data and information.  What you do with that data is up to you. 

[INTERCEPTOR]

The problem rest when and what play...

Problem exist if you play on luck. But, if you have a working concept based on LOT then this problem will disappear.

[6th-sense]

blueprint isn,t lott ..its based on dependence...can,t believe this obscure thread has had this impact...

with no word from the op.....

this forum is dying in a way you can,t understand...three forces against each other....absolutley no progress here ..

i feel older members think the same...i,ve been on the watched list for quite a while and i have no idea why...

[6th-sense]

Problem exist if you play on luck. But, if you have a working concept based on LOT then this problem will disappear.

this and dependence....people say its all voodoo...but is it...hell even on the other forum roulette life how i descrbed Dr talos bet he said i was spot on...

[Clf7]

6th sense reveal your winning method and then we can close the forum and discussion will be over 😋

[6th-sense]

6th sense reveal your winning method and then we can close the forum and discussion will be over 😋

i,m not here to do that..so jog on...who would....

i havent given a system...i can only give advice...and the comment you made on the youtube video as in why you don,t understand the experiment i,m doing  concerning the neighbours and numbers does not make me have to prove anything to you...hell i did it for free with that application for online playtech downloaded sites...

and that application was fully adjustable,,,,but with playing with  the settings ,, for any style of play if you can,t win money then you should just give up...

from one number ..no neighbours...or neighbours and the amount of numbers or neighbours too...wheel or table side..or both...for or against the selection...and can bet within the 15 second time frame

the unit size bet up or down if needed.....

very slick...lots of ways too use this..not just the normal way of thinking...

people like you makes me think why do i bother..

i could make a lot with subscription..

[cht]

One final very important point to understand correctly to properly understand LOTT.

The relationship between independent spins and LOTT, ie frequency distribution.

Mathboys assume future spins are independent that has no memory of past spins.

If future spins are truly independent, can there be a LOTT frequency distribution for every 37spins cycle with the numbers posted by Winkel?

Why we don't see 1,1,1,1,1........ Or 1,2,3,4,5.........? Not even close.

Can both co-exist in roulette spins?

Define in detail the exact meaning of independent, as in no memory.

Assumption of broadbrush use of independent spins has to be investigated in detail to see if this is true.

Discuss these questions of the relationship between independent spins and frequency distribution aka LOTT.

Open-minded discussion will benefit everyone. Sarcasm, mocking, belittling , ego masturbation benefit no one. Your forum, your choice.

If you don't get this right you have no chance to progress as a roulette player.

Thank you for reading.
Cheers

[Joe]

If future spins are truly independent, can there be a LOTT frequency distribution for every 37spins cycle with the numbers posted by Winkel?
Why we don't see 1,1,1,1,1........ Or 1,2,3,4,5.........? Not even close.
Can both co-exist in roulette spins?
Define in detail the exact meaning of independent, as in no memory.

I already did. Your comment about 'Why don't we see...?' is exactly the kind of misunderstanding I referred to in my previous post.
You don't see those kinds of events because the probabilities are so small, although they could in theory happen, given a large enough sample.

This has nothing to do with independence or dependence!!

Definition of Independence :

Two events are independent, statistically independent, or stochastically independent if the occurrence of one does not affect the probability of occurrence of the other

So successive spins in roulette are independent (and also successive series of spins). They are independent because on each spin of the wheel the number of pockets on the wheel doesn't change. Obvious? of course. Then why is there so much debate about it? 

There is no force or 'statistical pressure' which makes outcomes conform to balance (or unbalance), either in the next few spins or over many future spins. Therefore, whatever has occurred in the past (any aspect or characteristic of it) doesn't affect what will happen in the future.

I can't make it any more clear.

[cht]

I already did. Your comment about 'Why don't we see...?' is exactly the kind of misunderstanding I referred to in my previous post.
You don't see those kinds of events because the probabilities are so small, although they could in theory happen, given a large enough sample.

This has nothing to do with independence or dependence!!

When you are correct I will call it out.
You are correct on this specific part.

Pls delete(ignore) that part I wrote.
I realised my mistake but I could not edit it.

The rest remain intact unless someone can point out any errors.

This is how progress is made.

@Joe, you don't know anything more than what the theory says. Zero.
It's easy to do what you do. Most educated people get it.
You have nothing to be proud of.

[Joe]

The rest remain intact unless someone can point out any errors.

What is 'the rest'? You agree with me that past results do not influence future results, but seem to be saying that nevertheless there is a 'loophole' somewhere and that sometimes past results DO influence future results. Where to go from this contradiction? Since you're not going to give a concrete example of what  you believe to be dependence between spins, it seems there is nothing more to discuss.

[Joe]

@Joe, you don't know anything more than what the theory says. Zero.
It's easy to do what you do. Most educated people get it.
You have nothing to be proud of.

No, I'm not proud of stating the obvious. But it seems that a lot of people who read this forum don't get it, so I guess they're not educated. Instead of attacking the messenger why not give an example of your dependence theory? Then everyone will see what an obnoxious closed-minded mathboy I am and you will be vindicated and hailed as a hero and a genius. 

[cht]

But it seems that a lot of people who read this forum don't get it, so I guess they're not educated.

So why the fark do you care if they don't get it?

At the rate you post on this forum calling ppl uneducated shows that you got insecurity issues.

You go posting "Look at me Joe, I am educated in math. You are uneducated."

That's all you post.

You have serious issues. Screw loose in your head. Nutcase. Whatever.
Make a appointment with your psychiatrist. And don't skip the med.

People should see you for what you are.

I have called you out.

Done with you.