Shout out to Charles Edward Hampshire, I win every session of roulette

[Joe]

I have won over 60 consecutive sessions in a row consisting of 100 spins per session. Do the math. It is near impossible for it to just be luck

pepper, there isn't enough information to conclude that. How many actual bets have you made? How many numbers are you betting? (if you're betting different amounts of numbers per spin, what is the average?). Are you using a progression? How many WINS in total?

Without knowing those facts it's impossible to assess whether you've just been lucky. It's entirely possible to make a profit every session for 60 sessions if you're using a deep enough progression.

[cht]

pepper, there isn't enough information to conclude that. How many actual bets have you made? How many numbers are you betting? (if you're betting different amounts of numbers per spin, what is the average?). Are you using a progression? How many WINS in total?

Without knowing those facts it's impossible to assess whether you've just been lucky. It's entirely possible to make a profit every session for 60 sessions if you're using a deep enough progression.

Thanks for teaching me Joe. 👍

I am not doubting his claimed results. Idk.

It's the statistical inference I doubt if he has done it correctly.

And claiming 100% win holy grail bet in x spins carries a different meaning much more than a positive edge systems bet.

CWB - confirm win bet must have specific parameter definition. This jargon is nonsensical.

[Joe]

I am not doubting his claimed results. Idk.

His claimed results are completely meaningless without the information I asked for, so no statistical inference is possible. 

[ati]

There have been many members who claim to have the HG, but arent selling anything.

Does it mean we should just blindly believe them?

It appears such members either haven't tested properly and really lack experience, or do know their system doesn't work and just want attention. I haven't seen a single credible claim of the HG from anyone.

And you probably never will. You know how valuable a HG system is (would be), right? If it was made public or too easy to work out, or simply too many people would know about it, it would be worthless, because the game rules would be changed eventually.

Of course you shouldn't believe all of them. Based on their posts, I personally don't believe that any of the current active members have a HG. But that's just my opinion, I'm not trying to insult anyone or challenge them, because I know it would lead to nowhere.

Certain old members with those claims are far more intelligent and experienced than any of us on this forum. There are a lot of information that was never shared on the forums and only a few of us have access to it. None of that information is going to make it easy for anyone to work out a HG, but it clearly proves that those people are on a completely different level of thinking. The last thing they want is to kill the golden goose and get too much attention.
I am completely sane, I know the math of roulette, I can code and test systems, I know that it's impossible to guess what comes next, I know that the payout is unfair, I'm not a degen gambler. I can even prove that roulette is unbeatable if we assume that every outcome is independent.
But the hints that were given turn things upside down, and show that there is much more to this game and it might very well be possible to create a dynamic betting plan that stays ahead and can forever avoid the negative expected value to catch up.

[winforus]

What most people don't understand, is that there is no such thing as "HG". It's an illusion. Clear and simple. Equivalent to get rich quick schemes.

If you want to make money with Roulette, it will never come easy. If you want easy money - there are many far better options out there.

If you want to make money with Roulette, you will need to put in the work. Even Roulette Computers require that. It's the equivalent of building a business.

Most people are not able to accept this reality, and thus prefer to keep holding on to the illusion, that one day, if they spend enough time on this, they will find the "HG". That day will never come.

You got a guy who has made it in life, who has beaten Roulette and won a lot of money, and who can comfortably live off Roulette. His name is Steve. Yet, you ignore his advice, and choose to trust some randoms on a forum with 0 proof or evidence? (Not talking about Pepper here) This forum is fascinating place, if you want to study human psychology and stupidity.

[pepper]

I never actually got to thank Charles. Thanks a lot Charles! I am glad I stuck with your site til the end. I know you don’t really care much to get thanks and weren’t in it for the attention, but you deserve it. I am now living a much happier life!

[pepper]

In 4 months of membership you made your 2nd deal. Keep it up.

What a dimwitted comment. Congratulations. You get the idiot award of the year

[cht]

Certain old members with those claims are far more intelligent and experienced than any of us on this forum. There are a lot of information that was never shared on the forums and only a few of us have access to it. None of that information is going to make it easy for anyone to work out a HG, but it clearly proves that those people are on a completely different level of thinking. The last thing they want is to kill the golden goose and get too much attention.

I respect your right to your opinion about their knowledge and experience.

But I cannot accept these certain old members, like dyslexic or reddwarf or rrbb has any secret information to beat roulette.

I call bullshit.

You have zero evidence to support your opinion.

If you confirm you are privileged to have knowledge of such info outside forum then you may hv basis with your comment.

[pepper]

pepper, there isn't enough information to conclude that. How many actual bets have you made? How many numbers are you betting? (if you're betting different amounts of numbers per spin, what is the average?). Are you using a progression? How many WINS in total?

Without knowing those facts it's impossible to assess whether you've just been lucky. It's entirely possible to make a profit every session for 60 sessions if you're using a deep enough progression.

All flat bets. I bet every spin. My bet "randomly" changes from betting as low as one number at a time to up to 35 numbers at a time. So the average is 17 numbers per spin.

[cht]

What a dimwitted comment. Congratulations. You get the idiot award of the year

This is factual based on the link evidence.

[pepper]

If you want to make money with Roulette, it will never come easy. If you want easy money - there are many far better options out there.

You are correct. It is idiotic to just chase roulette only. There are plenty of ways to make money. Money isn’t even nearly as important as one’s lifestyle: happiness is more important. Desire for instant money is an illusion. If you are already a loser, you probably won’t understand how to beat roulette. People who are “naturally” winners catch on more easily.

[pepper]

This is factual based on the link evidence.

If you spent half the effort on finding a winning bet as you do trolling, you would ...

So, do you guys really think we can land man on the moon, but we cannot figure out how to beat roulette?

[cht]

You are correct. It is idiotic to just chase roulette only. There are plenty of ways to make money. Money isn’t even nearly as important as one’s lifestyle: happiness is more important. Desire for instant money is an illusion. If you are already a loser, you probably won’t understand how to beat roulette. People who are “naturally” winners catch on more easily.

That's why if you meant what you wrote then you stop posting about this 100% win holy grail.

I have made that stand today.
Read my signature below. 😊

[winforus]

Pepper, I assume that you are playing on real live wheels (in person or online), and not RNG.

Another assumption is that you are doing it on specific wheel or wheels.

Is this true? If yes, then congratulations. To me, you were one of the more level headed people here when it came to Roulette discussions, and politics, and I would have a hard time imagining you making all of this up.

[cht]

If you spent half the effort on finding a winning bet as you do trolling, you would ...

So, do you guys really think we can land man on the moon, but we cannot figure out how to beat roulette?

There is no such thing as a winning systems bet to beat random roulette spins that's independent and unbiased.

That's the math.

Stop dreaming.