Shout out to Charles Edward Hampshire, I win every session of roulette

[cht]

I will not give you anymore attention nor respond to your trolling. You are an attention whore and I will not give it to you anymore.

Make sure you do not respond to my post, liar.

[pepper]

Wasn't CHT on here a little bit ago (month or so) claiming he was leaving the forum and implying that he had the HG? I don't care enough to look, but I remember it. It's kind of funny that he did that and now is claiming that I don't have a winning bet.

He posts so much bullshit about roulette everyday that it's hard to find.

I feel entitled to make posts about roulette, because I actually know how to beat it. I guess I may sound arrogant, but it's true.

[pepper]

I know that it's impossible to guess what comes next

Is it impossible to guess better than 1% random?

The CIA has concluded that people can influence rng

[cht]

Wasn't CHT on here a little bit ago (month or so) claiming he was leaving the forum and implying that he had the HG? I don't care enough to look, but I remember it. It's kind of funny that he did that and now is claiming that I don't have a winning bet.

He posts so much bullshit about roulette everyday that it's hard to find.

I feel entitled to make posts about roulette, because I actually know how to beat it. I guess I may sound arrogant, but it's true.

Pepper, let me explain this clearly.

The math says that random roulette spins are independent and unbiased. This is the fact.

It's a standard requirement with gambling forums that we conform to this fact.

So it's our duty to not write things that say positive edge systems bet or 100% win systems bet,

IF we are unwilling to share the details of our systems bet, or

We are unwilling to provide proof of result on mpr.

It makes our claims baseless.
With no proof.
Where the general public has no means to validate our claims.

We may be a marketer in disguise,
Potential scammer,
Attention whore,

This claim fuels fantasy hope to desperate gamblers who will waste money, time and much more.

I realise my mistake to take up this responsibility to make a stand.
Read my signature.

You decide for yourself your course of action.

Nobody will know whether you made a mistake,
Made error in your testing,
Marketer, or
Scammer.
Nobody know your motive.

BUT the math still stand unchanged that random spins that's independent and unbiased is unpredictable with systems bet.

Leaving this forum or not is a personal decision.

I continue to be active on this forum only as a mathboy role to challenge ALL who make this claim of 100% win betting system aka holy grail.

This explains why I target you.
It's not personal.

If you truly understand the math, not stupid, educated, logical, rational and responsible person, consider seriously this post. Act responsibly pls.

[cht]

Is it impossible to guess better than 1% random?

The CIA has concluded that people can influence rng

If you think that it's possible to guess then you have not properly understand the math,

Random roulette spins are independent and unbiased.

No prediction is possible.

If you are referring to precognition, pls post on the relevant thread.

[ati]

Is it impossible to guess better than 1% random?

The CIA has concluded that people can influence rng

Yeah, as cht said, those are two different things. It's impossible to guess the next number with better than random accuracy, based on past numbers, patterns, etc.
With remote view, I think it's very possible, but that's a different topic.
I'm probably the only member who believes 100% in both precognition and a mathematical HG that can win every session. 

[Blueprint]

I'm probably the only member who believes 100% in both precognition and a mathematical HG that can win every session. 

You’re member 1 of 2.  I’m with you there. 

[winforus]

I'm probably the only member who believes 100% in both precognition and a mathematical HG that can win every session. 

If you believe in precognition, then you don't know it. If you knew it, you wouldn't need to believe in it. You can only know something through a direct experience.

Contemplate the difference between knowing and believing.

Watch this: link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=3omVb8Xr184

And then ask yourself, why do you believe  in mathematical HG? And where that belief comes from?

This is some advanced stuff, but I think you are one of the few that may be ready for it.

[winforus]

Wasn't CHT on here a little bit ago (month or so) claiming he was leaving the forum and implying that he had the HG? I don't care enough to look, but I remember it. It's kind of funny that he did that and now is claiming that I don't have a winning bet.

He posts so much bullshit about roulette everyday that it's hard to find.

I feel entitled to make posts about roulette, because I actually know how to beat it. I guess I may sound arrogant, but it's true.

You are right, I checked his posts and not so long ago he claimed that he has the FIRST and ONLY systems flat bet that wins consistently. He claims to understand math, yet he made his conclusion off a very small sample size, which tells me he is either clueless or is a troll:

Another 10sessions with simple rule of take profit at 90+ units and stop loss at -300units. Stop session at breakeven if -100units drawdown.

Result - 8wins, 2 breakeven, 0 loss.

2LoTD ensures that entropy must happen everytime.

This is the first and only system bet with flatbet, betting continuously every spin covering zero that wins consistently intl.

[cht]

You are right, I checked his posts and not so long ago he claimed that he has the FIRST and ONLY systems flat bet that wins consistently. He claims to understand math, yet he made his conclusion off a very small sample size, which tells me he is either clueless or is a troll:

You are not just a dumbfark liar.

Hey, why give me your attention again?
You miss me gay?

You are a lowlife that won't stop trolling on forum on so many threads.

This topic is officially closed.

FARK OFF LIAR

Remember your post not to respond to my post, dumbfark. 😂😂😂

[cht]

You are right, I checked his posts and not so long ago he claimed that he has the FIRST and ONLY systems flat bet that wins consistently. He claims to understand math, yet he made his conclusion off a very small sample size, which tells me he is either clueless or is a troll:

I get it.

You try to provoke me to steal my stuff.

Try harder dumbfark loser. 😂😂😂

[pepper]

The math says that random roulette spins are independent and unbiased

My winning bet automatically takes advantage of the randomness of the roulette wheel. It is very, very, very simple... Right in front of your nose simple. I can not prove it unless I were to give my winning bet away.

[cht]

My winning bet automatically takes advantage of the randomness of the roulette wheel. It is very, very, very simple... Right in front of your nose simple. I can not prove it unless I were to give my winning bet away.

I don't doubt you.

But you have to realise you are not providing any details about your bet.
You are also not giving any proof of play on mpr.

So nobody can validate your claim.

I made your same mistake.
Do what I do.

Stop posting about this claim on forum.
Go make real money.

[pepper]

All you have to do is copy off people who are successful. If you can't find a "hg" cwb "system", then move on to other things that can make you wealthy. This is only one way. I am even encouraging you people to move on and find other things if you cannot figure it out. Surely, I am not some clever scammer that's so clever that I make it look like I care about others by telling them to move on, etc.

I don't care if you don't believe me. You believe fantasy roulette systems and precog. So, your opinions don't concern me.

[winforus]

Pepper, is your winning bet based on physics? And are you able to create it on every wheel, or just some wheels with certain conditions?