Shout out to Charles Edward Hampshire, I win every session of roulette

[INTERCEPTOR]

I found the winning bet. I win every session of roulette. I've won over 60, 100 spin sessions with a flat bet. Charles was right. All you have to use is your brain and common sense. This might be my last post, because I expect to be mentally abused by idiots who cannot figure it out. I have no reason to lie; I am not selling anything.
link:s://web.archive.org/web/20100105123304/link:://win3million.com/

Ok, so you have winning bet, what are you trying to do with it? To sell? To give for free? To make jokes arround or what???

[pepper]

...sorry, got some pepper up my nose.

That explains a lot

[pepper]

Be realistic, and don't mislead people. Sorry I dont want to sugarcoat it.

I am not going to sugarcoat my claim by down playing it. I am being fully honest. Honestly, I just feel so happy to have found it that I came on here to tell others that it's true. You can believe what you want. I have no need whatsoever for anyone's money, time, nor attention.

On that note, CEH was a lying misleading piece of shit, who strung people along for his own kicks.

I thought the same thing at times. I even think this can be possibly true today. All I know for sure is that I can beat every session of roulette. I don't blame anyone for not believing me. I wouldn't believe me either.

It kind of all makes sense now. Why would Satan have spent so many resources going after me throughout the years? He must have known I was going to make this discovery. You can even check my posts in the past about being harassed by demonic aliens. People are just so ignorant about many things in our world.

[winforus]

Pepper, for the record I believe your claim that you won over 60 sessions. (I don't know if it was for play money/testing, or actual money).

What we can't know for sure, if this is due to variance (luck) or that you actually have an edge.

If you have truly found a winning bet, then I would expect you to play for real money and win as we speak. Are you currently doing that? How much have you won? How big is your edge? (EV)

People have the right to be skeptical, due to countless of other people on forums making similar empty claims, some of whom ended up being scammers/charlatans, and others who did it just for attention.

[mma]

You are right Stranger, smells as a scam....
He tested 6000 spins and he have the grail, pathetic.
I saw many systems hold for 100 k, 250 k flat bet and with progressions,  then go down to hell.....

Every piece of roulette knowledge or equipment sold on this site is a scam

[Steve]

Pepper, CEH is right here on this thread, posting under a fake name. Again. Using a proxy. But I dont have time to deal with people like him.

You'd need to be thick to believe any of his trash. CEH and his trash is a cancer on forums. If you want to promote bullshit, go elsewhere.

[Steve]

And Pepper, I'm not approving all your recent messages. I'm not wasting time picking the ones that arent just trash talk. If you want to respond with something of substance, do that and I'll approve those.

[Steve]

Can everyone please cool the fuck down. I have better things to do than moderate. I've started moderating anyone who continues the bullshit. You can disagree with each other, but dont be assholes. Everyone knows what is or isnt acceptable.

[cht]

Pepper, CEH is right here on this thread, posting under a fake name. Again. Using a proxy. But I dont have time to deal with people like him.

Hmmm interesting... 🤔

[stranger90]

Pepper, CEH is right here on this thread, posting under a fake name. Again. Using a proxy. But I dont have time to deal with people like him.

Yup and he is not selling anything, yet

[cht]

Yup and he is not selling anything, yet

Steve, the owner of this forum sells roulette computers.

Selling the proper way is not wrong.
Stop demonising selling.

What is wrong is the claims of win/profit with no proper proof.
Claims with no proof even without selling is a problem.

The problem lies with the claims.

Whether such claims are eventually sold or not does not matter.

No harm selling something as long as the seller doesn't make unsubstantiated claims, transparent with his marketing intent, sell in the appropriate section that Steve has provided for on his forum.

[Steve]

.. yet.

Remember passion ruleta? He professed he wasnt selling anything, but had the HG. Then he was caught spamming people via PM to sell.

And here we have Pepper following the same path, and only recently spammed his email address on the forum.

Pepper, I'm not an idiot. I may be lenient by allowing a lot of material, and even giving obvious scammers free reign for a while. But there's a limit.

BTW, if you wanted to sell something, you can do it, as per the rules. But if anyone scams someone and the complaints start piling up, the scammer is removed.

I'm not saying you are or arent a scammer. But you're spouting complete BULLSHIT with CEH. I've been here many times before. CEH had nothing. I knew this guy and even discussed with him off the forum. It has all been said before. Stiff shit if you havent read what I wrote.

And finally, on the comment about me allowing scammers here... I have a good idea of who's a scammer, based on shit they say. So why dont i ban them? As I've said before:

1. This is not a "nanny state". There is free speech. You should use your own brain.

2. I value free speech more than protecting people who should have enough brains to not send random strangers money, just because they made some claims.

Again when enough is enough, that's when I step in. I would HOPE that people are smart enough to push out any scammers, AS A COMMUNITY.... without a moderator needing to step in. But I sometimes do step in, when clearly a person is so full of shit, and people are genuinely gullible and lost. And I'd rather reduce free speech, than have a forum  with scammers flooding the place. It needs a careful balance.

[cht]

Again when enough is enough, that's when I step in. I would HOPE that people are smart enough to push out any scammers, AS A COMMUNITY.... without a moderator needing to step in. But I sometimes do step in, when clearly a person is so full of shit, and people are genuinely gullible and lost. And I'd rather reduce free speech, than have a forum  with scammers flooding the place. It needs a careful balance.

Steve, members who wish to discuss systems betting must be allowed to freely discuss their ideas.

There appears to be a witch hunt against systems bettors.

So long as systems bettors doesn't make claims it should be no problem.

Nobody should be allowed to harass systems betting threads.

winforus has been excessively trolling systems thread with his provocation posts. He should be given a formal warning for his conduct to stop his activity. Failing which his post be put on moderation.

Pls consider this. Thank you.

[Steve]

Steve, members who wish to discuss systems betting must be allowed to freely discuss their ideas.

Aren't they?

There appears to be a witch hunt against systems bettors.

Not really. It's just when someone claims 1+1=42, people who understand the math speak up, and the flat-Earther gets offended.

So long as systems bettors doesn't make claims it should be no problem.

I don't particularly care about "claims" alone. It's only a problem if someone has been making claims for some time, without any verifiable proof. That's sand in my vagina.

Nobody should be allowed to harass systems betting threads.

There's already a "safe place" for system players.

Calling Earth round, and backing up with verifiable information... is NOT harassment.

winforus has been excessively trolling systems thread with his provocation posts. He should be given a formal warning for his conduct to stop his activity. Failing which his post be put on moderation.

I dont know what you're referring to exactly. Basically when someone reports a post, I check and take action on that post alone - regardless of who started what etc. If you have a problem with anyone, report their individual posts. If they are repeatedly a problem, once I know about it, and if I agree, I'll put them on moderation and/or give them a warning.

[Steve]

Every case is unique. In this case, I see someone repeating unproven claims. No proof of anything is provided. Just carrot-dangling. Baiting - which isn't allowed as per rules.

Free speech is allowed and encouraged. But again there's a need for careful balance.