Shout out to Charles Edward Hampshire, I win every session of roulette

[cht]

Aren't they?

Not really. It's just when someone claims 1+1=42, people who understand the math speak up, and the flat-Earther gets offended.

No problem with that. I am doing the same thing now.

I don't particularly care about "claims" alone. It's only a problem if someone has been making claims for some time, without any verifiable proof. That's sand in my vagina.

Ok, excessive claims.

***Systems bettors take note.
Discuss freely systems betting without making excessive claims on your thread.

There's already a "safe place" for system players.

Calling Earth round, and backing up with verifiable information... is NOT harassment.

I agree.

I dont know what you're referring to exactly. Basically when someone reports a post, I check and take action on that post alone - regardless of who started what etc. If you have a problem with anyone, report their individual posts. If they are repeatedly a problem, once I know about it, and if I agree, I'll put them on moderation and/or give them a warning.

Ok, I will post you the evidence when winforus makes his next harrasment post on here.

[winforus]

Steve, members who wish to discuss systems betting must be allowed to freely discuss their ideas.

There appears to be a witch hunt against systems bettors.

So long as systems bettors doesn't make claims it should be no problem.

Nobody should be allowed to harass systems betting threads.

winforus has been excessively trolling systems thread with his provocation posts. He should be given a formal warning for his conduct to stop his activity. Failing which his post be put on moderation.

Pls consider this. Thank you.

Why are you so obsessed with me?  Still looking for attention I see.

Cht, I will give you 24 hours to bring up examples of me trolling.(you won’t find any) If you don’t, I will report your posts for slander.

Also, since you made exact same post in both threads, your posts will be reported for spam.

[INTERCEPTOR]

Is it legit to share his book for free?

[pepper]

I've had a dip. I've lost the past few sessions 

I'm mma, not ceh

[6th-sense]

It is my book lol I put that all together sure you can

[INTERCEPTOR]

It is my book lol I put that all together sure you can

Ok thank you my best friend here, I hope copyright flaw will not catch me if I put on torrent 

[stranger90]

Ok thank you my best friend here, I hope copyright flaw will not catch me if I put on torrent 

Why would you pollute the torrents with this piece of crap?

[6th-sense]

Why would you pollute the torrents with this piece of crap?

This isn’t something I made up..it’s the actual site copied and pasted into the book so it wasn’t lost..

The guest book page I didn’t put in it..though I still have that too

Everyone thinks or mostly everyone agrees with you but nevertheless some people still find it interesting or want to know what went on all those years ago

[cht]

I've had a dip. I've lost the past few sessions 

I'm mma, not ceh

Einstein is famously quoted as saying: “The only way to beat roulette is to steal money when the croupier isn't looking.”

Btw, I'm mma. I admit I fibbed a bit about the winning bet. It wound up losing. At least I can man up to my mistakes.

Not surprise at all.

Math of roulette is real.

It's not a joke.
Or shafted blindly into systems bettors face just to frustrate and provoke these players.

Law of large numbers will eventually enforce the math.

Money management as in negative progression does not change anything.

There's no edge in systems betting.

No edge does not mean losing bet.

It means the systems bet can't do better or worse than the odds. It performs to expected value itlr.

I checked out CEH CWB when Pepper started this thread. CEH claims of 100% consistent win bet about dozen is simply nonsense. No need to test. Just use logic and math.

All those past gurus who made this similar claims CEH, DrTalos, dyslexic, reddwarf, RRBB, vaddi are all wrong. This make them liars.

You're a uneducated sucker if you continue to believe such 100% win claims. This type of rubbish claims give systems betting a bad name. It implies that ALL systems bettors are stupid and liars.

[Mean]

I know part of Charles’ bet. When you donate to Children in Need, good knowledge will naturally flow through.

[Taotie]

I know part of Charles’ bet. When you donate to Children in Need, good knowledge will naturally flow through.

I have my own children, thanks, enough for me to donate there.

[Steve]

I have my own children, thanks, enough for me to donate there.

Someone let you have sex with them?

[thereddiamanthe]

& that ain't an obscenity. (←mean)


well, count me out - for me no lol