Reading randomness and systems are not advantage play

[Andre Chass]

Hey
What a long time i haven't been here
You guys are still here?
Go home!
There's no way to beat roulette.
The wheel has no memory.
Trends and patterns are only in you heads.
The wheel don't give a shit about repeaters or non hit.
It's just an illusion...

Asta la vista!!!

[Mean]

eh

eh is the even high bet. Don't play it, unless you feel like burning some cash.

[Steve]

Andre, you should know there are legitimate ways to beat roulette. It just doesn't include the typical attempts.

[Andre Chass]

Andre, you should know there are legitimate ways to beat roulette. It just doesn't include the typical attempts.

Yes, selling roulette computers. 
If you really beat the roulette using your computers, you would already be rich and wouldnt need to sell them.  Oh, are you already rich?  So go enjoy life, your fancy cars, mansion yacht, etc.

There are no excuses for you are still here in this forum trying selling your products/services.

Not personal

[Steve]

Yeah. If banks already have lots of money, they don't need to continue. Bankers should just retire to an island now. The fact they continue
or even offer any additional service means they don't really make money. And no banker has multiple revenue streams. That's your logic Andre.

Andre, you've really got no idea. About me, my life, what I do, how I make my money, or anything to do with roulette. You should know I'm selling my roulette "sales" component (about $500k/year alone), because I don't need it. I could go on, but it's not your business. Just focus on your own life instead.

People like you attack success of other people because of you're unhappy with your own life. Again, focus on your own life or you'll repeat the same mistake.

[Mean]

Gizmo's still on here making shit up about beating roulette.

[nottophammer]

Don't Feed the troll !

Giz, he wouldn't see a bet if it was staring him in the face

[gizmotron2]

he wouldn't see a bet if it was staring him in the face

So true. If a dozen went to sleep for 15 spins in a row he would miss out on it.

So let's see if he can get this one. There has been a little discussion on using a sleeping dozen or a streak of singles to play a 50 /50 game while the condition continues. And for the great unwashed you will know when the condition ends on the first spin that it ends on.  The moment has just past so stop wishing it will continue. It's over. The event is done. You lost on a 50 / 50 bet.

But let me show you something even more interesting. When a dozen sleeps you get more repeats of the same dozen in the other two active dozens. You can verify that by observing thousands of spins or even by simple binomial distribution percentages.

So look what happens if you bet on just one of the two active dozens to repeat once more after a win on a single dozen bet.

If I place a bet on the first dozen to win while the third dozen is sleeping then it's a 50 / 50 bet as long as the third dozen stays asleep.

But if I let that first dozen win and let the bet, including the winnings, ride then I win 8 from the repeater.

So 1 becomes 3

and next 3 becomes 9

That all comes from guessing two single dozen bets correctly in a row.

Now let's see if Mean can figure out what I mean?

[carvigno]

Brilliant. Now you are on the right track for once.

That all comes from guessing two single dozen bets correctly in a row.

Or two winning bets in a row which has the same outcome but is not the same thing.

[gizmotron2]

Or two winning bets in a row which has the same outcome but is not the same thing.

How true. You can put two bets together without them needing to be connected back to back.

For anyone struggling with the odds just look at this.

Two in a row at 33% chance:

.33 X .33 = 10%
You have a 10% chance of hitting  two single dozen bets even when you stager them or not.

.50 X .50 = 25%
But when a sleeper or singles are used you have a 25% chance of hitting two in a row or two staggered in a row. That pays 8 to 1 if you win the parlay.

[carvigno]

In the end all is about observation.
If you are able to catch up with the rythm of random outcome the wheel is producing you'll have an edge.
You need to play an event, a non randomn event for that matter, with statistics in mind.
Unbalance in those statistics will happen more often than not and you are there to watch them and profit from them.
if you know what to bet and you are sharp enough to know when  to bet, taking into account the favorable windows that will show up, you'll succed in this game.
Conventional math wont solve the problem how to beat roulette.

[travis]

Toda secuencia aleatoria estará contemplada en las probabilidades teóricas pero su aparición solo la verán muy pocos. Los criterios, los sistemas, la lectura promete mas de lo que realmente da, ahí es donde entra el factor estadístico para el manejo de la gestión para que una simple ola no te lleve mar adentro

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any random sequence will be considered in the theoretical probabilities but its appearance will only be seen by very few. The criteria, the systems, the reading promise more than it really gives, that is where the statistical factor comes in for the management of the management so that a simple wave does not take you out to sea

[carvigno]

Just to ilustrate what Gizmotron and me are talking about let me show you what ive seen a moment ago in a european roulette live stream.

7
35
25
0
18
21
34
29
22
14
34
28
14
23
18
18
29
24
4

[gizmotron2]

So I took your list and formatted it for two of my practice apps.
7,35,25,0,18,21,34,29,22,14,34,28,14,23,18,18,29,24,4,  and I got two kinds of results.

The first picture is EC's and the second one is Dozens.

[Ross]

The first picture is EC's and the second one is Dozens.

So?