Reading randomness and systems are not advantage play

[gizmotron2]

So?

Normally I'd say something crass and just wonder off laughing. Something like stick your head back up your ass and forget about Roulette. I don't think that fits here though.

So oohh...

Look at the second picture and the sleeper in the 1,2,3 first column on the left.  If you notice there is a streak of doubles in the active dozens.  This allows you to take advantage of them for a few spins. But what is much deeper in this logic is something most people don't think about. Whenever there is a sleeper you get about 50 % of one dozen and 50% the other of the active dozens while the sleeper continues.

So you flat bet this  section on one side of the active bets and get a net of say 50% wins and 50% losses for an aggregate win of say 12 net units won. That comes to 4 times 3 if you do the step one math.  So you now have 4 attempts at step two of the progression on the next sleeper. This is at a later time. If you bet those four attempts during a later sleeping dozen then you might win two of them. So your 12 net wins grow to 18.
Now that's simplification. You can win many step one net wins off of many sleeping dozens and then increase your bet as your bankroll grows.

So I I win half the bets at 2 to 1 and lose half the bets at 1 I will grow my bankroll just on the simple odds.

It all comes down to observing basic conditions and watching for things that continue and figuring out how to exploit them if they do continue. Things continue or they end. It's so simple to observe.

[carvigno]

Look at the second picture and the sleeper in the 1,2,3 first column on the left.  If you notice there is a streak of doubles in the active dozens.  This allows you to take advantage of them for a few spins. But what is much deeper in this logic is something most people don't think about. Whenever there is a sleeper you get about 50 % of one dozen and 50% the other of the active dozens while the sleeper continues.

So you flat bet this  section on one side of the active bets and get a net of say 50% wins and 50% losses for an aggregate win of say 12 net units won. That comes to 4 times 3 if you do the step one math.  So you now have 4 attempts at step two of the progression on the next sleeper. This is at a later time. If you bet those four attempts during a later sleeping dozen then you might win two of them. So your 12 net wins grow to 18.
Now that's simplification. You can win many step one net wins off of many sleeping dozens and then increase your bet as your bankroll grows.

So I I win half the bets at 2 to 1 and lose half the bets at 1 I will grow my bankroll just on the simple odds.

It all comes down to observing basic conditions and watching for things that continue and figuring out how to exploit them if they do continue. Things continue or they end. It's so simple to observe.

If a Casino let you write down this quote on a wall inside its facilities or in flyers given for free at the entrance there would be the same amount of losers as ever.

Most gamblers lose not because of 2.7 tax but for their lack of a good attitude while playing.

[Ross]

" Things continue or they end. It's so simple to observe."

Trouble is that you can only observe after the event.

Guess I'll have to buy those magic "see into the future" specs I saw
advertised in the magicians magazine.

[gizmotron2]

Trouble is that you can only observe after the event.

Knowing when a trend ends is not magic.  I advise that the first loss is the end unless you are using singles on the weak side. In that case two losses in a row indicates the end of the pattern.  I suggest that you give up on gambling.

I also can also see a pattern already in a condition of continuing.  There is no point in starting to bet on a streak of reds if there is an active streak of blacks going on. But perhaps magic glasses will fit your style of gambling.  You tried to be condescending but you failed. Nobody cares if you are a neo-mathZombie.

[gizmotron2]

If a Casino let you write down this quote on a wall inside its facilities or in flyers given for free at the entrance there would be the same amount of losers as ever.

Most gamblers lose not because of 2.7 tax but for their lack of a good attitude while playing.

There might actually be more losers. There is an example of this in gambling already. When card counting took off big after the book 'Beat The Dealer' the casinos first panicked right off the bat. But later they discovered that most wannabe card counters sucked at it. So they let people count cards as long as they are not skilled at dealing with common variance. They run out of headroom in their bankrolls for instance.  They panic and get desperate when a losing streak is more powerful than a slight mathematical edge. These kind of amateurisms are wide spread and all across all gambling games.

[Ross]

There is no point in starting to bet on a streak of reds if there is an active streak of blacks going on.

A streak of red and a streak of black at the same time?

How can that be?

[gizmotron2]

A streak of red and a streak of black at the same time?
 
How can that be?

Really?

[stranger90]

Gizmo when you gonna just quit the talk and walk the walk? What do you have to show so far? You keep avoiding this question and come with excuses. The wheel put you on your knees and made you blind, gives you a strike from time to time bur you still dreaming that you're a winner.

[gizmotron2]

Gizmo when you gonna just quit the talk and walk the walk? What do you have to show so far? You keep avoiding this question and come with excuses. The wheel put you on your knees and made you blind, gives you a strike from time to time bur you still dreaming that you're a winner.

It really doesn't matter what I do. What really matters is did I share something with others that actually works. If I did share something that other people have working for them then what does that make you? You are a detective that could not find his dick. I get a certain happiness from watching all these saviors that have a meaningful purpose for protecting the rest of us gamblers. You could accuse me of the same for sharing Reading Randomness. But I have a good reason. Do you have a good reason to stop people from discovering for themselves?

[stranger90]

What works? Can you or someone that you thaught show that it works? You are more and more delusional day by day and keep showing trends after they happened. Actually yeah I have an interest, to see something constructive on the forum, a scratch that others can develop and make something of it. So far you are pulling everything down with your fallacyes.
The only thing that I have found so far to work better than random is precognition, thanks to this forum. When I will share my results after a decent ammount of spins it will look like magic to you. I wish more folks get into it instead of falling prey to your fantasy. You are trying to fight on math's playground but also don't understand it, you are a danger for yourself brother.

[winforus]

It really doesn't matter what I do. What really matters is did I share something with others that actually works.

You proved that it doesn't work by having a losing record on RS. How can it work, if you when you play with it, you lose?

And where are the people posting that they tried it and it turned them into winning players? Nowhere to be found.

[gizmotron2]

You proved that it doesn't work by having a losing record on RS. How can it work, if you when you play with it, you lose?

And where are the people posting that they tried it and it turned them into winning players? Nowhere to be found.

Perfect. Thanks for cooperating.