• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

My Dynamic Roulette Bet

Started by Mean, Oct 31, 06:23 AM 2020

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mean

Part One of my Dynamic Roulette Bet

I go through “patterns” by labeling each result as ol, el, oh, and eh. When the same result occurs, I treat it and the following results as a series until a mixed result occurs. When an opposite result occurs back-to-back, I treat this and the results that follow as a series of mixed results.
These are all clustered as a series of series results and mixed results. When I lose one bet, I reverse it by placing my bet on the exact opposite of where I would bet.
This is a 27 number bet.

Richard Meisel

Quote from: Mean on Oct 31, 06:23 AM 2020
Part One of my Dynamic Roulette Bet

I go through “patterns” by labeling each result as ol, el, oh, and eh. When the same result occurs, I treat it and the following results as a series until a mixed result occurs. When an opposite result occurs back-to-back, I treat this and the results that follow as a series of mixed results.
These are all clustered as a series of series results and mixed results. When I lose one bet, I reverse it by placing my bet on the exact opposite of where I would bet.
This is a 27 number bet.
Congratulations, my friend Mean, you are Reading Randomness. A 27 number bet does win 71% of the time. There are many clustered "patterns" that can be used including EC's.

cht

Quote from: Mean on Oct 31, 06:23 AM 2020
Part One of my Dynamic Roulette Bet

I go through “patterns” by labeling each result as ol, el, oh, and eh. When the same result occurs, I treat it and the following results as a series until a mixed result occurs. When an opposite result occurs back-to-back, I treat this and the results that follow as a series of mixed results.
These are all clustered as a series of series results and mixed results. When I lose one bet, I reverse it by placing my bet on the exact opposite of where I would bet.
This is a 27 number bet.
Welcome to the system betting club. 👍

Mean

A Session Won

I won 4 units if you apply French Roulette rules to this session. Follow my line as that's where I bet; I switch sides for each loss. S means same or series. M means mix. For example, ol is a series of ol, el, and oh. A mix of ol is everything except ol, so el, oh, and eh.

This simulation is taken from Wizardofodds.com. I just started in the beginning of the 1 million spin simulation.
link:s://wizardofodds.com//games/roulette/simulation/

gizmotron2

You could learn from me.

Reading Randomness "Combo Bets" is light years ahead of you.

You can use my practice software, for free, to practice and learn the value of your nifty idea.

So here are 100 spins in a row on all Red / Low numbers. You can see them in the bottom text box.

Just look what happened. It's a win streak. That's what one looks like.


-----------------------------------------
W | B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  01  --  02 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  02  --  25 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  03  --  16 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  04  --  31 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  05  --  18 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  06  --  22 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  07  --  27 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  08  --  04 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  09  --  22 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  10  --  05 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  11  --  21 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  12  --  07 ( $ 180 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  13  --  04 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  14  --  13 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   | X |  --  15  --  08 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  16  --  12 ( $ 180 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    | X | X |  --  17  --  23 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  18  --  35 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
   |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  19  --  36 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  20  --  37 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  21  --  03 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  22  --  27 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  23  --  28 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  24  --  15 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  25  --  25 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    | X | X |  --  26  --  23 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  27  --  17 ( $ -135 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  28  --  05 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
   |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  29  --  36 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  30  --  27 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
   |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  31  --  30 ( $ -135 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  32  --  14 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  33  --  24 ( $ -45 ) Red / Low
   |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  34  --  34 ( $ -90 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  35  --  03 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  36  --  32 ( $ 0 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  37  --  07 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   | X |  --  38  --  08 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  39  --  32 ( $ 45 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  40  --  03 ( $ 180 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  41  --  14 ( $ 315 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  42  --  25 ( $ 270 ) Red / Low
   |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  43  --  34 ( $ 225 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   | X |  --  44  --  08 ( $ 180 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  45  --  10 ( $ 135 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  46  --  06 ( $ 90 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  47  --  12 ( $ 225 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  48  --  05 ( $ 360 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  49  --  14 ( $ 495 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  50  --  33 ( $ 450 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  51  --  19 ( $ 405 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  52  --  06 ( $ 360 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  53  --  01 ( $ 495 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  54  --  07 ( $ 630 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  55  --  16 ( $ 765 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  56  --  02 ( $ 720 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  57  --  18 ( $ 855 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  58  --  19 ( $ 810 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  59  --  01 ( $ 945 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  60  --  13 ( $ 900 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  61  --  11 ( $ 855 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  62  --  24 ( $ 810 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  63  --  16 ( $ 945 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  64  --  22 ( $ 900 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  65  --  12 ( $ 1035 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  66  --  26 ( $ 990 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  67  --  03 ( $ 1125 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  68  --  09 ( $ 1260 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  69  --  11 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  70  --  20 ( $ 1170 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  71  --  35 ( $ 1125 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  72  --  31 ( $ 1080 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  73  --  18 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  74  --  21 ( $ 1170 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  75  --  06 ( $ 1125 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  76  --  10 ( $ 1080 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  77  --  14 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  78  --  05 ( $ 1350 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  79  --  31 ( $ 1305 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   | X |  --  80  --  08 ( $ 1260 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  81  --  05 ( $ 1395 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  82  --  35 ( $ 1350 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  83  --  02 ( $ 1305 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  84  --  31 ( $ 1260 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  85  --  21 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   | X |  --  86  --  08 ( $ 1170 ) Red / Low
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  87  --  20 ( $ 1125 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  88  --  16 ( $ 1260 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  89  --  15 ( $ 1215 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  90  --  18 ( $ 1350 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  91  --  09 ( $ 1485 ) Red / Low
   |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  92  --  27 ( $ 1440 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  93  --  09 ( $ 1575 ) Red / Low
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  94  --  18 ( $ 1710 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  95  --  15 ( $ 1665 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  96  --  07 ( $ 1800 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  97  --  29 ( $ 1755 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  98  --  13 ( $ 1710 ) Red / Low
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  99  --  17 ( $ 1665 ) Red / Low
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  100  --  07 ( $ 1800 ) Red / Low


Reading Randomness is a single thread. It is backed up by a software instruction thread and software download threads. The Even Chance Pro 1.4 version is the best version to practice on.
gamblingforums dot com/threads/reading-randomness.14733/

Mean

Bump.
This bet works beyond statistical probability for the wizards results (at least up to a certain point). I tried it on other spins, and of coarse it’s no better than random betting.

I also have a bet for baccarat with similar results. Of coarse you cannot profit off it, but it demonstrates something in baccarat that should happen a lot more often (just a simple sequence). It also passed on other random results I obtained. It doesn’t profit, but a certain sequence happens way less often than it should according to math.

Even if this roulette bet falls within the math, I challenge you to find a better bet with the same or similar (27 number) variance. I tried hundreds of combinations/methods and found none that could dent the house edge like this one (only with the wizard’s simulation)

I am not stupid. I know there is no reason for this, but it definitely seems beyond random chance.

Mean

Bump.
This bet works beyond statistical probability for the wizards results (at least up to a certain point). I tried it on other spins, and of coarse it’s no better than random betting.

I also have a bet for baccarat with similar results. Of coarse you cannot profit off it, but it demonstrates something in baccarat that should happen a lot more often (just a simple sequence). It also passed on other random results I obtained. It doesn’t profit, but a certain sequence happens way less often than it should according to math.

Even if this roulette bet falls within the math, I challenge you to find a better bet with the same or similar (27 number) variance. I tried hundreds of combinations/methods and found none that could dent the house edge like this one (only with the wizard’s simulation)

I am not stupid. I know there is no reason for this, but it definitely seems beyond random chance.

Tekunda

Quote from: Mean on Jan 01, 04:18 PM 2021
Bump.
This bet works beyond statistical probability for the wizards results (at least up to a certain point). I tried it on other spins, and of coarse it’s no better than random betting.

I also have a bet for baccarat with similar results. Of coarse you cannot profit off it, but it demonstrates something in baccarat that should happen a lot more often (just a simple sequence). It also passed on other random results I obtained. It doesn’t profit, but a certain sequence happens way less often than it should according to math.

Even if this roulette bet falls within the math, I challenge you to find a better bet with the same or similar (27 number) variance. I tried hundreds of combinations/methods and found none that could dent the house edge like this one (only with the wizard’s simulation)

I am not stupid. I know there is no reason for this, but it definitely seems beyond random chance.

I don't exactly understand how you bet. Could you please show a few examples with numbers when and what you bet?
I apologize already for not being the brightest light.

thereddiamanthe

The thing is that 'the bet you switch to'  ain't always performing diametrically opposite.
Or in other words the bet you switched the last time  ain't necessarily the 'opposite performing' option!

The 'PERFORMANCES' of each type - those few or several - you have determined to include in the arsenal VARY, as variance keeps producings random different strings always consisting of differently placed numbers.


This ain't a roulette graph - biorythm, but proves the point.

i.e. azure & green line

So as of now I think that having a 'constant' bet sequence acting as a probe, & such bet sequence being like a parachute minimum type of betting or at least a sequence that with one non-hit pass produces not much & recoverable drawdown - it might be possible to almost always be betting the correct bet selection that is currently performing well, having an app that clearly displays the unified chart of balances produced by each 'static' bet selection.

Mean

I never searched for performances of sequences. Doing so is useless because it’s all random. I just change my bets after a loss. It all losses in the long run, so I guess the opposite would be to not bet.

Roulettebeater

Last year I spent three months developing a similar method, in the beginning it worked good but later it failed and ate my whole bankroll.

A dollar won is twice as sweet as as a dollar earned

thereddiamanthe

 What went wrong & WHY?

How similar?

The General

Quote from: thereddiamanthe on Jan 02, 10:46 AM 2021
The thing is that 'the bet you switch to'  ain't always performing diametrically opposite.
Or in other words the bet you switched the last time  ain't necessarily the 'opposite performing' option!

The 'PERFORMANCES' of each type - those few or several - you have determined to include in the arsenal VARY, as variance keeps producings random different strings always consisting of differently placed numbers.


This ain't a roulette graph - biorythm, but proves the point.

i.e. azure & green line

So as of now I think that having a 'constant' bet sequence acting as a probe, & such bet sequence being like a parachute minimum type of betting or at least a sequence that with one non-hit pass produces not much & recoverable drawdown - it might be possible to almost always be betting the correct bet selection that is currently performing well, having an app that clearly displays the unified chart of balances produced by each 'static' bet selection.

I'm sorry, but I just can't take you even remotely seriously.  Why do you write such fluffy BS? 
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

thereddiamanthe

The point is you are unable to take me. Besides I wasn't addressing you..

Sunburstsoon

I admire "thereddiamanthe" dedication to his own particular research and can attest that he might not have English as his primary language and so often what he wants to convey (in my opinion) is not what is interpreted. We must look beyond conversational patterns of speaking and get to the nitty gritty pieces of information.  Of which he "thereddiamanthe" is a true researcher of. Even if it of a different trajectory than the one we are on.

What I agree with most about "thereddiamanthe's" research is that he is relentless. Yes he can be short but who cares We are no here to make nice, we are here to help each other get to profit.

No offense to you general but I just wanted to say my part about "thereddiamanthe"
I have followed you as well "general" and like your work.

sunburst
Meditate your way to being a successful roulette player

-